This video covers an alternate theory to the theory of the current geologic timescale which explains phenomena which stumps uniformitarianism, it covers polonium halos, the formation of coal and oil, dinosaur fossils...and provides a logical and scientific train of thought which conflicts with the currently widely accepted geologic time scale.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2713235761357666270

How does Darwinian Evolution explain these?

http://www.allaboutscience.org/origin-of-species-video.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmY85uoVEEA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSHKL62kXhI

Evolution simply cannot account for all the evidence.

Younger fossils being burried under older ones, long extinct animals being discovered to actually still exist, canyons forming in weeks, C14 still found in coal and diamonds, an increase in the amount of C14 in the atmosphere (which was supposed to have already reached equilibrium), sedimentary rock layers that were apparently formed by water, concentrated bone graveyards scattered over the world, polystrate fossils of animals and plant life, suboceanic cities and artifacts, fossils and evidence of human giants, unexpected radiometric dating results being dismissed as error, human fossils and man-made artifacts found in stone and coal that was suposed to have been formed long before the existence of humans, fossilized artifacts known to have existed less than a hundred years ago...

If I were asked how I would define a religion, I would probably say one of two things:
1) Religion is what is used to explain the origin, purpose, and destiny of humanity.
2) Religion is faith in that which cannot be proven, but is believed to be true anyway.

Since I am certainly not the authoratative standard of word definitions, I offer dictionary.com's definions of the word "religion" too:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion re·li·gion /rɪˈlɪdʒən/ –noun 1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

I have been accused of being unable to ask valid questions, and of not knowing much science. Accordingly, what I ask now is not a question but rather all of your Rational Responses to the video accessed by the link at the bottom of this entry. Please take some time out of your busy schedules to view it, even if it...

"...means facing answers that you don't like."
-Hambydammit on Fri, 2007-03-09 15:15 in How To Ask Good Questions

My anticipation is that the first responses will fire back on the age of the film, the nationalities of its scientists, or things against myself as a person, but I earnestly beg that only "Rational Responses" be ushered in please.

Our present atmosphere consists of 78% nitrogen (N2), 21% molecular oxygen (O2), and 1% of other gases, such as carbon dioxide CO2), argon (Ar), and water vapor H2O). An atmosphere containing free oxygen would be fatal to all origin of life schemes. While oxygen is necessary for life, free oxygen would oxidize and thus destroy all organic molecules required for the origin of life. Thus, in spite of much evidence that the earth has always had a significant quantity of free oxygen in the atmosphere,(3) evolutionists persist in declaring that there was no oxygen in the earth's early atmosphere. However, this would also be fatal to an evolutionary origin of life. If there were no oxygen there would be no protective layer of ozone surrounding the earth. Ozone is produced by radiation from the sun on the oxygen in the atmosphere, converting the diatomic oxygen(O2) we breathe to triatomic oxygen O3), which is ozone. Thus if there were no oxygen there would be no ozone. The deadly destructive ultraviolet light from the sun would pour down on the surface of the earth unimpeded, destroying those organic molecules required for life, reducing them to simple gases, such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and water. Thus, evolutionists face an irresolvable dilemma: in the presence of oxygen, life could not evolve; without oxygen, thus no ozone, life could not evolve or exist.

So are you skeptical of Christianity?

Are you looking "everywhere" for answers to a few tough questions but find nothing because no Christian can give you a straight answer that makes sense?

No Fear! The following link is here!

http://www.carm.org/questions_skeptics.htm

Only a single shred of undeniable evidence of an Earth less than even 1 million years old would create lots of problems for Evolutionists.

Here's a link for 14 possibilities to chew on...counterpoise?

http://www.icr.org/article/1842/

Questions to invoke...

1. If pretty much all myths, fables and legends are initially founded from some amount of truth at some time, is it so reasonable to believe that there is no God when practically every known ancient culture believed in One? Normally only details become exaggerated, so why does each have a common spine of a deity?

2. If one's world view mandate that no God exist, how could you clearly see the truth of a potentially existent God if it were starring you in the eyes? Wouldn't you simply dismiss the very thing you wish to know without ponder?

3.Where does man's innate sense of wrong come from that he knows he shouldn't bring harm on another person?