I watched the interview with Cameron and had to say something about the way the debate was handled.

Kelly said that Kirk and Ray never presented a single shred of evidence that God exists. However, neither Kelly nor Sapient presented evidence that God doesn't exist either. I know that Kirk and Ray said that they could prove God existed so that's probably why Kelly said what she said.

However, I'm simply pointing out the fact that although Kirk and Ray didn't "prove" God existed, neither Kelly nor Sapient can "prove" God doesn't exist either.

So considering both sides can't prove either way through the scientific method, it's pretty redundant in my opinion to say so. In other words, it's a moot point.