HELP! As free-thinkers how should we direct theists to achieve the ultimate goal?
My letter to Rational Responders:
Dear Brian and Co.,
I literally have “stumbled” upon you and your team recently while scouring the web for pertinent Atheist videos and religious debates. Having viewed most of your work and video responses I’d have to assert that I really enjoy your intellectual approach to the matter and respect for others (namely, Christians and stupid people).
First and foremost I have a question to propose. Let me give a little background of myself. I grew up in a Methodist and Presbyterian household. Seems natural to me that my parents raising two kids would enroll them to Sunday School every week so that they feel like better parents raising their children right. As far back as I can remember, I was always quicker to the knowledge draw for kids my age. I ended up correctly identifying “an emergency vehicle” (or fire truck) when I was age two or three, and earlier than that I started picking up adult words and understanding packs of them conversing. And around second grade to fourth grade I [re]became an atheist, while letting my parents take me to church every Sunday where I eventually completed “Confirmation” and became a member of that church. So in ways I’ve had a similar experience to you Brian. I know that you became a born again Christian at age 13 and grew up Catholic. It’s true that I officially “came out” to myself at about the age of 11 or 12, and have always known it in the back of my mind. Maybe it’s just my Western culture showing, but all my life I have believed that if ANY one of these theists have got it right, then it’s the Christians who are on the right track.
To the point: I am caught in a dilemma. I know you are constantly defending your honor from the angry mobs and whatnot but if you could help. I have never seen this question posted, answered, or even proposed before. Perhaps it’s because evolution and hell are back by popular choice. I’ll leave those for the message boards. Anyway here is my question for you all. I have many, many Christian friends, some more open than others. Say we ARE right about there being no god, no heaven and hell. No afterlife. But take a look at your average household Christian family. What I want to know is...it better for us to let these people continue living these delusional, happy (perhaps very healthy) lifestyles for years and years until the eventually become a part of this earth? Or would you propose that we as logic-thinkers with visions should try our best to coerce humanity to drop their theistic beliefs and values in order for us to come together as a more productive and perfect society in the name of science?
Do you see why I am caught here? I seem to have this firm belief in letting people stay happy living whatever healthy lifestyle they see fit, and go with it. No matter the knowledge that I possess. Don’t take the orange crayon away from the autistic kid even if he likes to chew on it right? I also believe that if it is truly our job to wake up the public then you are doing a fine job. I’ve seen many others with valid points like yours, however name-calling and belittling theists is no way to go. These kinds of things take patience and time, and for that I applaud you.
Once again to the point: I see two ultimate futures for mankind (this is of course excluding a massive nuclear winter). The first is very similar to where we are now. Technology has advanced far more than we have expected, the cost of living is down, fuel dependency down, and Religion more mixed and scattered and everyone finds his or her own way of life. Everyone is as happy as they possibly can be with cultures/religions conflicting on a daily basis—roughly what it is today. The other future involves many generations of you and I alike, bringing the facts to the table. One-by-one opening the eyes of people, ideas for a wake-up call across the globe. Making Atheism more proverbial and maybe actually losing the name tag, as it should be.
Now I bring up the issue of happiness. You can’t just stop at religion. You must keep the best interest of the people in mind (for, isn’t what this is all about?). Will Option Two relieve people of their previously eased state of mind? The kind where you always thought that there was someone watching over your shoulder and waiting for you in the afterlife and now you don’t? It seems quite possible that one might be drained of energy for living. Maybe having something larger to live for ultimately makes life worth living for. Sure takes the fun out of Christmas when you find out Santa Claus ain’t real eh? To sum up this argument, I really do not know where to point my compass. What is truly better? We (you and me) might be happy with our lives right now, but my instincts are telling me that it’s probably just because we know we’re right and the majority of society is wrong. The smell of satisfaction without the stench of smugness. What then after it all becomes orthodox? You see since I realized that I was an untried, yet gifted youth with the power of sight to see through all the churchy hoo-hah, I taught myself to bite my tongue as I watched people pray with hope in their hearts, as I watched parents cry over dead children saying with a smile and tears in their eyes, “It’s okay, I know he’s gone to a better place.” Who was I to tell them?
I hope you realize how very important these points are and I hope that they will be addressed. If we do this right, we could certainly benefit the many other users out there by gettin this on YouTube or just opening the minds of individ. Some people, to be honest, would never dream up such a question. Let’s show them that it does in fact pertain to them. I have faith in you.
Sincerely,
Adam V.--Spokane, Washington
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not wiling? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him GOD? --Epicurious 33 A.D.
- Login to post comments
I'm surprised that you haven't seen this addressed on the site. Did you miss all the threads on people killing in the name of God - even their own children!? Religious thought is dangerous... People aren't just living delusional happy lives in the privacy of their own homes. Their irrational thought leads to acts of terrorism and hate.
Crayons are non-toxic. Religion is not. Would you take the orange crayon away from the autistic kid if it was laced with arsenic? Or would you just let him die because you don't want to be inconvenienced with his crying and yelling?
Now fast-forward a thousand years or so. Would you take the orange crayon away from the autistic kid if it was an explosive and would take down the entire building, including yourself, if he keeps chewing?
The problem with religion is it has a bad habit of causing things like this:
I would love to be able to just sit back and let the theists do whatever they want, but the fact is that religion has a lot of negative effects on society. Atheists right now are the least trusted minority in the country. Personally, I have met quite a few older people who like me until they find out Im atheist. My favorite quote so far from telling someone I was atheist is: "Dont say that. I wont like you if you say that." And thats only the tip of the iceberg.
If theists were capable of understanding the concept of "live and let live", then yeah, there would be no reason to not let them have their delusions. Unfortunately, they cant. So we have to create sites like this to defend ourselves.
"I may be going to hell in a rocketship, but at least I get to ride in a rocketship. You have to climb those damn stairs. " - Katie Volker
I would suggest to you to read The End of Faith by Sam Harris, or his shorter book, Letter to a Christian Nation. Excellent books which clearly lay out the case for why it is necessary that we tackle this problem of faith head on, even if it makes a few moderates uncomfortable. They need to be made uncomfortable because complacency is deadly.
Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!
Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!
Haha I think you may be generalizing a little too much. Careful about this:
Religion can certainly be non-toxic. You just must have this image in your head about suicide bombers and children sacrificers everytime you hear the word. But i guess what i meant was, think about all those wholesome Christian families. They eat healthy, they see have big holiday gatherings and treat one another with respect, they don't impose on anyone else, and they're not even close to violent people. Of course with your analogy involving the arsenic crayon, sometimes religion CAN make people go bonkers and kill people. But make sure you don't say that everyone is doing that. That is just plain incorrect
I'm going to have to agree with WhiteMan on this one. I too would like to sit back and let them do their thing. the problem is that there are some who are ruining how we view them
And remember.. Some Atheists can be just as harmful as religious zealot nutjobs. Just because we are right, doesnt mean we're better people
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not wiling? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him GOD? --Epicurious 33 A.D.
Except when they vote all the officials into office that prevent possible life saving science by opposing Stem Cell Research, push Pro-Life bills, and teaching ID in schools.
They do bad too my friend. And all because of that sick little fairy tale. My fundy mother has always been a supporter of Bush because he pays lip service to the Christian god.
Look how much good that's done for us.
"I am an atheist, thank God." -Oriana Fallaci
Sure. i agree with you.
But people who vote for officials just because they attend service, they are stupid anyway and will fall for fairy tales. It's sad. People have so much potential yet they give up more than half of it because they want to cover their asses when they die.
For the most part I would like to see stem cell research officially kick off and for PETA to stop fire-bombing university research labs.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not wiling? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him GOD? --Epicurious 33 A.D.
It's always refreshing to hear a theist disavow the minority that poisons the perception of the majority. However, it takes more than just saying I do not agree with what the minority says and do nothing about it. If we as a nation believe that we are all equal why not allow gays to marry? Why did it take so long for women to attain the same rights as men in voting? Why do some states discriminate against atheists over religious couples in adopting children?
If the majority of moderates would have the fortitude to tell the evangelicals that the USA is a secular country most of these perceptions may go away. Secularism seems to be a dirty word anymore, but in many other developed countries it shows that it need not be. I won't go into much detail about this because I do not know how you feel about this topic and not sure if it is relevent to this discussion or not.
Atheists are a clear minority and very few theists want to even try to understand our points of view. I can't understand why this is. If I didn't trust a group of people wouldn't it be best to understand why I don't trust them? If I hated jews, maybe I would want to understand the reasoning behind my belief. Unfortunately, our perception of the world is often based on our upbringings and the influence of important social institutions like the church instead of critical thinking.
I have had a similiar event take place when I was at the barber shop recently. I get my hair cut at the same place I have for 10 years now, but I never had an opportunity to air my atheism because the topic never came up. However, when it did recently, I stated that I was an atheist the whole shop got dead quiet. I got the usual questions of why and it shows such a lack of understanding that I feel is all too prevalent in our society. The idea that I could not believe what someone did was foreign to them. It is just an irrational fear of what we do not understand and even some atheists fall into the same trap. Faith can blind people to the truth. I do not believe you are totally closed-minded. You do qoute yourself as "right" so there still leaves some room to question rather or not I am right in this assumption, but you have the decency to admit you're not perfect. If you has said I believe that we are correct instead of the absolute you used I could always give benefit of the doubt. You warn us not to judge the actions of some and place that judgement on the whole, but go on to claim an absolute that shows hubris.
"Always seek out the truth, but avoid at all costs those that claim to have found it" ANONYMOUS
Oh yes, believe me I know that my last sentence makes me seem a little arrogant. But I originally intended to say " just because we think that we're right, doesn't make us better people." I probably deleted and retyped it about four times.
The point was to make a blunt statement of reference concerning the fact that right or wrong.. makes no difference to define a person's character
I have a good sense of humor. But I sure hope all of you have seen this link before:
http://www.nicemustard.com/wp-content/uploads/svf.gif
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not wiling? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him GOD? --Epicurious 33 A.D.
Hey... You're the one that started the flawed crayon analogy.
'wholesome Christian families,' huh?
Will the Moderates Please Get Pissed? Please?
SillySqueeze, I apologize for the post previously. I misread your OP and jumped to an assumption you were a theist. I must have been tired when I was writing my response. I take back the whole hubris thing LOL. Guess I need to read just a little more closer before I shoot from the hip.
"Always seek out the truth, but avoid at all costs those that claim to have found it" ANONYMOUS
SillySqueeze, while I can sympathesize with where you're coming from (I don't like to offend and upset otherwise calm and complacent people), there is something here that I think you need to consider more carefully:
The word 'healthy'. Certainly, the average family of Christian moderates are happy. But not by a wide margin should they be considered healthy. They subscribe to a magical world view, believe in an omniscient and omnipotent being that not only created everything that is but also answers their personal requests, and flagrantly - though claiming the contrary - ignore the scientific method and it's demands for evidence.
A man who has fabricated a devout family and wonderful career while living on his own and taking-in a very typical income through typical means may be very happy while immersed in his fantasy life - but would you argue that it's best he's just 'left alone' to relish in fictional enjoyment? Or should he be helped professionally, so that he accepts who he is and where he is, and can find more genuine happiness and campanionship for himself?
- Leon Trotsky, Last Will & Testament
February 27, 1940
I think that many of us (I say us because I do this all the time) are a bit overly defensive towards moderates and can sometimes over-estimate the attack against them. I've a hunch that the majority who find the RRS message 'offensive' are thinking of a moderate friend, one who has never felt the need to attack another's faith, that they just have a personal picture of the world along with a practice of good will towards overs.
So perhaps it would be good to recognise two points:
(1) If Christians in America weren't stepping on people so much, the RRS would never have come about.
I don't think the RRS would ever have happened in Europe, atleast not aimed at Christianity in the same way.
There are serious political problems being caused by religion at the moment and people have to stand up to it.
It might be that some nice people have their bubbles burst in the process, but what's the alternative?
(2) It's really hard to imagine a truly moderate person having their beliefs attacked. Okay, they might come across sweeping statements about their religion that upset them, but if they are the 'real deal' happy nice guys that they are supposed to be, they are unlikely to stir up the kind of mood in you that would bring up debate. Leaving them to it would come pretty naturally and you'd have to push yourself really hard to attack them.
Maybe some of these happy moderates like to debate, but in such situations they'd want you to treat them with respect, so long as the debate stayed civilised honesty should be the way forward - such moderates don't want to be lied to or patronised.
It's all too easy to imagine some sweet little kid who loves their Jesus being badgered, pestered and bullied by some Dr House kind of character (even for those of us who like the guy, even he freely admits that he's an asshole! ) but in reality I don't think that's what's happening at all, atleast not in the world of RRS.
The RRS has always targeted the fundamentalists and biggots who have set out to spread ignorance, hate and fear where they can.
When a genuine moderate shows up they have spoken up and acknowledged their respect for them.
I do believe the RRS is definitely needed with all the misinformation out there. The unfortunate thing is that, like starting young kids off learning more than one language, adults' mindsets are already laid in stone by the time RRS comes around to show them the facts. Religion is something your form your whole life around, and when they become of a ripe age where some Atheist comes around to convince that person that they've misshaped their entire life it's really hard for them to swallow.
I just came across this name the other day, I know he's kind of famous but If no one in this discussion knows about Benny Hinn the scam artist, celebrity evangelist then chech out this to familiarize: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUyPjeIFKug
If narrow-minded Christians dont tick me off, then it's scum like this that really get me boiling.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not wiling? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him GOD? --Epicurious 33 A.D.
As is said in the equally fictional (as Christianity) world of "Battlestar Galactica,"
"So say we all."
“It is true that in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. It is equally true that in the land of the blind, the two-eyed man is an enemy of the state, the people, and domestic tranquility… and necessarily so. Someone has to rearrange the furniture.”
You guys are making yourselves largely unapproachable. When you call Christians stupid because of what they believe or tell them they have some kind of disorder, whatever truth there is to it, and have guns on your front page, you yourselves appear very angry, which translates to some insecurity about your own opinions, and may want to consider revising your tactics.
It's like the kids in grade school who wear all black with black lipstick, and make themselves unique in more than one way because they think differently. Point being, you can do so much better if you worked on blending your activism to where it's taken seriously among locations that the influential ears are among the theist community.
Activism is GREAT, but you can't be unapproachable. I'm not telling you how to dress, either. Like I said, you guys need to set your sights away from the soft targets and work on improving your image to members of significant standing in the churches, and the riff-raff will disperse if you can do that.
Young atheists, demographically speaking, 18-25, are more numerous than ever before.
I'm seeing a lot of black lipstick type of comments, for example members quoting their own bits of wisdom. That's arrogant to a lot of folks on both sides of discussion.
Also, the front page has an AK-47. again, unapproachable. theists are to expect on this forum FUCKTHESYSTEM types who can't offer much advice besides "your beliefs are dumb". If they didn't think that already, they wouldn't have visited/registered on your forum to get a 2nd opinion.
signature? can i borrow your pen?
We approach religious people in a lot of different ways, theCops. This is just our atheist hang out. Our strike force. I am a member of christian forums where I take a much more gentle approach.
There is no one way to our goal, but many ways. This here is but one.
We have our fingers in a lot of pies.
"I am an atheist, thank God." -Oriana Fallaci
Sillysqueeze, the point here is that the bible DOES teach very bad things, such as stoning children who don't obey and such... In fact, even assuming there aren't bad things in the bible, what happens is that EVERYONE interprets it differently and acts upon their own interpretations.
Those who are NOT good Christian families, and ARE hurting America and others around them, call themselves the same thing as you do! Christians! So why not drop the bible belief, drop the 'christianity', and just have your own personal beleif in a god, instead of Jesus Christ? Why call yourself a Christian and let these people act on your behalf? If there is such different interpretations of this book, get rid of it and write your own. The whole organized religion thing is the problem here, if all the "Good Christians" weren't part of it, they would still be good people, could still teach good morals to their kids, could even still ridiculously beleive in a God, BUT they wouldn't be supporting these outrageous Christians who want to make laws based on the bible, and do hurt people around them.
In essence, if the "good christians" drop themselves from the total number of christians, we are left with a singled out group of people who are doing very bad things, and who would then stand out for the bad things they are doing. Instead what happens, is that we have Millions of good people supporting a BAD cause, based on a bible that isn't true and everyone can interpret how they want... This means a politician can say he's doing christian things without really having the support of all the other Christians, but it doesn't matter because they are still Christians so everyone assumes they are behind him.
On a side note, if you could drop the organized religion part and have your own personal connection with a God, instead of following a book that someone else wrote... You'd start to realize how fantasized it all feels, and learn that without all the re-inforcement of the preachers and other Christians around you attributing the good things in their life to Christ... It's all bullshit! Take the blinders off and stop going to church for a year, start listening to both sides, stop listening to preists who will twist the bible to sound good either way, and start realizing reality.
Basically, the fundamentalists are doing what the bible says, which is very radical and controlling of the laws. All the other Christians jump on the bandwagon, even though they have mixed feelings about things like Abortion, Stem Cell research, etc. etc. but it doesn't matter, because those like George Bush are supported by Christians and churches in general, so these fundamentalist ideas come out even though they don't make up the majority of beliefs of the group they come from originally!
This is why we must try and enlighten people to do things on their own, based on reason, not on what they are told by the church or a book... To think for themselves!
"Don’t take the orange crayon away from the autistic kid even if he likes to chew on it right?"
Even though crayons are "non-toxic", they are still unhealthy and can ultimately lead to a stomachache. It's not about "taking it away" from people as much as it's about showing them the healthier alternative, such as eating crackers instead of wax.
I understand where you are coming from, but understand that letting religion live and let live is a lot like saying "Women can't vote and don't have equal rights, but there are plenty of women who don't mind or feel happy being socially and financially controlled by men."
*Our world is far more complex than the rigid structure we want to assign to it, and we will probably never fully understand it.*
"Those believers who are sophisticated enough to understand the paradox have found exciting ways to bend logic into pretzel shapes in order to defend the indefensible." - Hamby