Human Universals
In another book I'm reading by Stephen Pinker, he makes reference to work done by an anthropologist named Donald E. Brown who, inspired by Chomsky's Universal Grammar, decided to study archives of ethnography to try and lay out qualities of a Universal People.
He's apparently written an entire book on the subject, which I'm extremely interested in reading, but Pinker has listed some of the universals Brown has found.
The complete work apparently lists at least 400 different traits (and I assume it elaborates), but just this list is pretty dazzling....
....and, needless to say, corrosive to any dogma that claims it invented or has a monopoly on any of this.
Regardless of geographic location, religion, or culture, all of the following have been documented in all peoples around the globe:
Value placed on articulateness.
Gossip.
Lying.
Misleading.
Verbal humor.
Humorous insults.
Poetic and rhetorical speech forms.
Narrative and story-telling.
Metaphor.
Poetry and repetition of linquistic elements and three-second lines separated by pauses.
Words for days, months, years, past, present, future, body parts, inner states (emotions, sensations, thoughts), behavioral propensities, flora, fauna, weather, tools, space, motion, speed, location, spatial dimensions, physical properties, giving, lending, affecting things and people, numbers (at the very least "one", "two", and "more than two", proper names, possession...
Distinctions between mother and father.
Kinship categories, defined in terms of mother, father, son, daughter, and age sequence.
Binary distinctions, including male and female, black and white, natural and cultural, good and bad.
Measures.
Logical relations including "not", "and", "same", "equivalent", "opposite", general versus particular, part versus whole....
Conjectural reasoning (inferring the presence of absent and invisible entities from their perceptible traces).
Nonlinguistic vocal communication, such as cries and squeals.
Interpreting intention from behavior.
Recognized facial expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, disgust, and contempt.
Use of smiles as a friendly greeting.
Crying.
Coy flirtation with the eyes.
Masking, modifying, and mimicking facial expressions.
Displays of affection.
Sense of self versus other.
Sense of responsibility.
Sense of voluntary versus involuntary behavior.
Sense of private inner life.
Sense of normal versus abnormal mental states.
Empathy.
Sexual attraction.
Powerful sexual jealousy.
Childhood fears, especially of loud noises, and, at the end of the first year, of strangers.
Fear of snakes.
"Oedipal" behavior (possessiveness of mother, coolness toward her consort).
Face recognition.
Adornment of bodies and arrangement of the hair.
Sense of sexual attractiveness based in part on signs of health and, in women, on youth.
Hygiene.
Dance.
Music.
Play, especially play fighting.
Manufacture of, and dependence upon, many kinds of tools, many of them permanent, made according to culturally transmitted motifs, including cutters, pounders, containers, strings, levers, spears....
Use of fire to cook food and for other purposes.
Drugs, both medicinal and recreational.
Shelter.
Decoration of artifacts.
A standard pattern and time for weaning.
Living in groups, which claim a certain territory and have a sense of being a distinct people.
Families built around a mother and children, usually the biological mother, and one or more men.
Institutionalized marriage (in the sense of publicly recognized right of sexual access to a woman eligible for childbearing).
Socialization of children (including things like toilet training) by senior kin.
Children copying their elders.
Distinguishing of close kin from distant kin, and favoring close kin.
Avoidance of incest between mothers and sons.
Great interest in the topic of sex.
Status and prestige, both assigned (by kinship, age, sex) and achieved.
Some degree of economic inequality.
Division of labor by sex and age.
More child care by women.
More aggression and violence by men.
Acknowledgment of differences between male and female natures.
Domination by men in the public political sphere.
Exchange of labor, goods, and services.
Reciprocity, including retaliation.
Gifts.
Social reasoning.
Coalitions.
Government, in the sense of binding collective decisions about public affairs.
Leaders, almost always nondictatorial, perhaps ephemeral.
Laws, rights, and obligations, including laws against violence, rape, and murder.
Punishment.
Conflict, which is deplored.
Rape.
Seeking of redress for wrongs.
Mediation.
In-group/out-group conflicts.
Property.
Inheritance of property.
Sense of right and wrong.
Envy.
Etiquette.
Hospitality.
Feasting.
Diurnality.
Standards of sexual modesty.
Sex generally done in private.
Fondness for sweets.
Food taboos.
Discreetness in elimination of body wastes.
Supernatural beliefs.
Magic to sustain and increase life, and to attract the opposite sex.
Theories of fortune and misfortune.
Explanations of disease and death.
Medicine.
Rituals, including rites of passage.
Mourning the dead.
Dreaming, interpreting dreams.
A place common to all will be maintained by none. A religion common to all is perhaps not much different.
- Login to post comments
What was the name of the book by Brown?
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism
It's simply titled "Human Universals".
The book isn't very old (1991), but it seems as though it might be out of print. You can still buy it used from Amazon, but only if you're willing to pay in the range of $50.
I'd really like to read it, but I don't know if I $50 want to read it.
Maybe it can be downloaded or something.
A place common to all will be maintained by none. A religion common to all is perhaps not much different.
Gotcha. That kind of thing is right up my alley, but a book that recent that's out of print already scares me a little. I may check the university library here, or see if the public library can get a hold of a copy. One would think that evolutionary psychologists would be all over a work like this, but it's the first I've heard of it... not that I'm on the cutting edge of evo-psych... but still...
Bah, I'm rambling.
Thanks again for the info.
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism
I think the million dollar question is whether all these human universals are hard wired domain specific modules in our brains that are products of natural selection. Certainly face recognition can be localized to the bilateral regions of the temporal lobes (ie. a region called IT) and destruction of these areas results in an interesting neuro-cognitive deficit called prosopagnosia (ie. the inability to recognize faces). Also interesting is the fact that there are genetic conditions which result in prosopagnosia which lends support that these brain areas are innate domain specific modules. It is yet to be determined whether we can extrapolate this to other human universals. A fascinating topic indeed!!!
We also are pretty sure that language instinct resides in one of the lobes, although I forget which one. If I recall correctly, they've also found a specific gene that affects linguistic ability. Have you heard about that whole family in England that has trouble talking? It takes intensive speech therapy to get them to be able to communicate at all, and they mess up very simple rules of grammar. They're apparently not learning disabled in a traditional sense. They just don't know how to talk.
Also, the parts of human culture involving face recognition, sense of self, imitation, etc, all seem to have to do with mirror neurons.
I always sense a certain fear in people when this subject is broached. It's as if the knowledge that we are what we are for a reason somehow threatens to take away our sense of self. I've never understood it. Knowing why things are the way they are has always helped me... then again, that's why I'm not a theist...
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism
There is an irrational fear that if the dark side of human nature (eg. racism, genocide, rape, murder, etc..) has genetic underpinnings then this may justify our cruel intentions. What a load of crap, I say!!!! And those very same individuals who have a misguided romantic view of human nature so easily forget the devastating consequences of forced social engineering (eg. Mao's China, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge and Stalinist Russia).
ragdish, have you ever read "The Lucifer Principle" by Howard Bloom? It's as good an effort as I've seen towards building a scientifically based understanding of human nature for the average non-scientist reader. While I don't agree with everything Bloom says, he certainly addresses the idea that acknowledging our nature justifies atrocity.
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism
Hamby:
Yeah, I was a little disappointed to discover that it was out of print already, and it does make me wonder what the reason might be.
I managed to find this summary/review, though:
http://www.ishk.net/universals.pdf
It sounds like maybe Brown's book may have been unpopular due to so many anthropologists favoring complete cultural relativism, which is a position Brown was arguing needs to be re-examined. But I don't really know.
A place common to all will be maintained by none. A religion common to all is perhaps not much different.