I'll try answer from my ex-fundy perspective:

I wouldn't go so far as to say a non-christian can't do any good. However,you are right in saying that they are with god or are not. So while they may do good, they will still go to hell. Salvation cannot be earned by good works, but by faith alone.

As I have been reading a lot on linguistics and framing lately, I would say you are falling into the trap of using someone else's eyes to look at the situation. While it is true that it is good to try to see things from your opponent's point of view so as to understand their argument better(and yours as well), it does no good to use their frame to describe your worldview by merely saying it is opposite to theirs.

I think you are describing the difference between Chistian Fundamentalists who base their teachings on helping others versus secular humanists who see human suffering as a problem worth solving. Here is what I would say a reframing of this argument would look like:

Atheists do not believe in God. Since they believe there is no God, Atheists do not accept the many contrasting theological moral absolutes commanded by various Gods as absolute. Being "good" is defined by the society one lives in as well as the moral compass intrinsically provided by human evolution(with some exceptions). Atheists and secular humanists, while not mutually inclusive, many times overlap or become one in the same. That is not to say that an Atheist need to be a secular humanist to be concerned with helping others, but rather that many Atheists see this life as their only one and try to make it the best they can, for themselves and others. While being quite optimistic and idealistic, Secular Humanism (Wiki)"upholds reason, ethics, and justice, and specifically rejects the supernatural and the spiritual as warrants of moral reflection and decision-making. Like other types of humanism, secular humanism is a life stance focusing on the way human beings can lead good and happy lives."

Keep it rizl. Maybe you can get this thread moved to the theist vs. atheist forum.

  Bible Paul was definitely crazy ...... but talented ..... can you feel that pain ? 

Fundamentalists don't think atheists can't do good things as much as they consider their good deeds worthless without Christ.  This is one of the many points at which I strongly disagree with fundamental Christianity.  I tend to agree with James in that faith is dead without works - not that works justify you, but that good deeds will certainly follow - but I certainly don't think goodness and atheism are mutually exclusive.  If anything I respect the goodness of atheists more so than the goodness of Christians.  At least your good deeds are conducted without the pretense of "Well, I have to.  God insists." 

  The story Jesus said this is heaven. Obviously Xains don't read the bible, and are Jesus' enemy  ........  hell makers and hypocrites xains are ......  

  I think the "saving' Jesus message was simply being free of all superstition and rejecting the church hypocrite masters and religious dogma.  "One with the father (cosmos)".  Yes, "the Christ in me / you.  Simple ..... 

  The Buddha message is basically the same with many suggestions to eliminating unnecessary suffering ..... Thanks J/B , yeah the church is the tricky clever devil of wrong thinking .....  

   If you "see the light" , and "believe in me", my message of "ONE", you are "saved" ..... and eternal with the father (cosmos) as everything recycles (reincarnation) .....

  Both J and B are atheistic , religion is a theist version thing .....