|
Navigation
The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us. Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple
|
Paisley = Chancellor
Posted on: June 21, 2008 - 8:27pm
   Offline
Paisley = Chancellor
Ha ha, unless I'm mistaken Paisley is over at the Internet Infidels forum calling himself Chancellor. He's even using the same old lame phrases "lurking god belief" blah blah. http://iidb.infidels.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=246452&page3
|
|
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2024.
|
Yes Prozac, I'm certain you are correct, that's our friend Paisley. I have asked why he doesn't concentrate on "saving" them "God of Abe" sheep instead. (???)
Oh well, I have no big grips with 'pantheisms' .... In fact I think at this historical time it is helpful. It's an xlint higher step up the ladder, that the "god of abe" folks can relate too, to help them in abandoning their superstitions and dogmas.
I also appreciate the way our elegant Eloise presents it , as a message of "Oneness". Pantheism is basically a philosophical scientific musing on the the nature of consciousness related to E/M.
[ edit - DG, no like my equation!
- I meant, Energy / Matter
Atheism Books.
Definitely sounds like the asshat.
EM? As in electromagnetism? How precisely are EM and consciousness related?
"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.
-Me
Books about atheism
Energy / Matter is the substance of all Consciousness, in my simple opinion. Pantheists seem to question this, but I don't mind, as they seem to not attach dangerous dogmas to their ideas ..... at least most of them, as I understand them.
Atheists and Pantheists reject 'God of Abe doctrine', and that is good ....
Atheism Books.
I agree it's Paisley as it has the same tricksy techniques and obvious disdain for atheists. His wording of "lurking God belief" and athestic worldview, use of QM, etc is all pure Paisley. Guess he is still pursuing his vendetta against all the atheists he can find. Such a waste of a mind. He should get a girlfriend or find a hobby.
____________________________________________________________
"I guess it's time to ask if you live under high voltage power transmission lines which have been shown to cause stimulation of the fantasy centers of the brain due to electromagnetic waves?" - Me
"God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, - it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks please. Cash and in small bills." - Robert A Heinlein.
Paisley's ( aka Chancellor ) thread is now up to five pages. His panentheistic merry go round is picking up speed and definitions are colliding
like bumper cars.
I believe he suffers from narcissistic personality disorder, the same "disease" which afflicts President G. W. Bush.
According to Wikipedia, all it takes is five or more of the following:
Paisley AKA chancellor exhibits 1, 2 (he thinks he's brilliant), 3, 4, 7, and 9, and perhaps others which have not manifested in conversation. You could probably make an argument for '8', too, with the "lurking God belief" as a form of envy.
This disorder, coupled with his inability to concede even the most trivial of points (a result of this disorder), makes it a waste of time conversing with him.
"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers
>.>
<.<
>.>
1 through 9... /check
What Would Kharn Do?
has a grandiose sense of self-importance
My time is too important to waste reading this stupid topic
is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Sorry, wasn't paying attention
believes that he or she is "special" and unique
Jesus loves me.
requires excessive admiration
Say I'm pretty. SAY IT!
has a sense of entitlement
You owe me an apology.
acks empathy
So what?
is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her.
You wish I was envious of you.
shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Fuck you.
What's happened to our dear friend paisley? Seems to have left the material universe since PDW blew his cover.
There are no theists on operating tables.
I believe he's attacking atheists elsewhere ( at least three other sites ) while using the exact same argument that he used here at RRS.
His condescending attitude and argumentative style seems to be his trademark.
This wouldn't be the first time that you were mistaken. Now, do you really think I would make the following argument?
http://iidb.infidels.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=246694&page=3
"Scientists animated by the purpose of proving they are purposeless constitute an interesting subject for study." - Alfred North Whitehead
Good to see ya Paisley. I checked that Chancellor out and would have bet that was you. Maybe you guys are reading the same books ?!! Do you promise on your personal honor that ain't you? This is spooky man .... !
Hey, "save" any Christians yet ??? ....
Atheism Books.
I certainly wouldn't put it beyond you. You change your premises more frequently than you breathe. It wouldn't be the first time that you've directly contradicted yourself -- and of course whenever that happens, you exercise your "tongue-in-cheek" escape clause.
Also quite curious how long you kept your silence before coming to your own defense.
There are no theists on operating tables.
edited because I really don't give a shit anymore.
What, that Sam Harris is actually a pantheist? I'm pretty sure you have made that argument, Mongo.
"You've got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons." - The Waco Kid