If we place God within the universe to be subject to Time, then that still doesn't really give you what you're pushing for.

An infinite amount of time in the past doesn't prevent you from getting to now, it only prevents you from backtracking to a beginning point from any point in that infinite array of time.

However, if God created the universe, then God exists outside of it, and outside of Time, and so whatever action he took would have occurred at no time at all, though the effects would each have been felt within the Universe at some point in Time. I'd guess (because it seems to make sense) that these effects would take the form of some natural phenomena, and so would appear to be felt at the points in time when such phenomena would be predictable to occur. From the perspective of the external Enactor, asking 'when' it was done would be like asking the next person you talk to face to face "Where is 'now'?"

But then, having to come up with these explanations is one of the reasons why Occam's Razor suggests it's far more practical to just set aside the 'god' idea for just as long as we can get along without it. God requires the reverse of Occam's Razor... call it... Beaver's Cleaver: Whenever a simple explanation appears to account for the observed phenomena, Beaver's Cleaver requires the observer to immediately think of six or seven completely unfounded and excessively complicated ways to account for the same phenomena less accurately.

Ops here is where you have some misconceptions I used the word “god-time” to describe the timeline for god if god lacks a time dimension he is a cripple and actually nonexistent. The sill argument that if you cripple god he somehow can perform magic is nonsensical if god posses no god-time he is unable to interact or do any thing because without the passage of time he only is a frozen mass lacking the ability to do a thing or create because you need to have a change of your structure in time to make it. And eliminating one dimension (time) for god you are in fact giving a argument like

“ god can bend 3D space because he is 2D and can not interact with 3D space”
Agene this disproves god permanently. Remember for god to understand or interact he needs to change ( memory card registering events) if he haze no god-time he is frozen forever like a person in a cryogenics chamber unable to move or understand a thing.

I understand Occam's  razor however I would like theists to answer this because I love playing theology games there is no mistranslation or out of context. And it’s a impossibility to doge this problem  its like to say that you can make a square circle if you take away the smoke and mirrors it’s a plain old contradiction and down right silliness from the theist apologetics “god is a genius because he is retarded and not a genius” that how silly all Christian apologetics sound trying to answer this problem.
 

Well I agree .

Can I ask you something  are you a pantheist ?

God doesn't really have to make itself proven or not, my view of god just makes it irrelevent. I have many problems with the creation of mankind as pets, toys or whatever a god needed to satisfy some innate desire. If you believe the bible god created the angels but a third fell from grace along with "satan". What was the necessity of creating beings that would be known to cause the down fall of your pet project (humans)?

I will say god, if one exists, had to have a beginning. Well, unless someone can explain to me how this could be without having to profess some certain amount of faith, because god is just isn't an explanation. All things have to have a beginning unless someone can prove to me otherwise. Yes, it's amazing that so much matter exists in the universe but attributing the existence to god is lazy.

I think the term for a god that lives outside the cosmos is an acosmic god, wow kinda starts with an "a" like atheist huh.

Indeed. As an atheist myself, I hope you don't think that my suggestions are intended as justifying god. I'm simply postulating how such things might be possible. I also might get to sleep with Sarah Chalke, but I'm not gonna go investing any belief in it.

Yes I totally agree . And now we decided that we need to answer the question where did god came from or what created him in god-time. And here is the point where Christian heads explode because the pastors explanation is insufficient.

I would love Christians to answer this  because if god existed a infinite amount of time it disproves gods ability to create or proves that god actually doesn’t need us.

Well a little to tricky for me I would say a round cylinder that at one of its ends is connected to a cube. In a 2D plane this object would be a circle yet at the same time a square. Because the different objects would be hidden in a unreachable dimension. However this object can be only a circle or a square at one moment in time not at the same time.

I think this little set of questions will be the crown Jull in my unholy trinity of logical disproves of god. The first one is why trust god if he could be only deceiving you and the second one is the disprove of the concept of all knowing simply giving a matrix scenario for god. Remember theists don’t use Occam's razor and they argue for 101% knowledge about god.

I've seen theists explain that God exists outside of our space/time; that he exists extradimentionally, or in a way we cannot perceive.

Some of the same theists adamantly deny the existence of Zeus and Odin, due to lack of evidence, oddly enough.

About "theists". Pantheists and Panentheists, I find little to disagree with, especially  as teacher RRS  Eloise  presents herself. But of course she is usually over my head,  as I know little about QM and the detailed parts of science. My disagreement with basic pantheism etc, is really a scientific one regarding consciousness, and I have mostly only my intuition to go on, and that ain't much, but I don't worry about it. I actually laugh about it.  Me gawed, as You ....