Porn:

kryters
kryters's picture
Posts: 26
Joined: 2007-11-05
User is offlineOffline
Porn:

As your stereotypically sex-obsessed late-teenage male, I have been very interested a one of the recent posts on these boards: Why are certain folks bothered by erotic imagery? It was partially responsible for spawning a discussion with a good female friend of mine about pornography.

My friend’s ultimate conclusion was that porn in itself is not a bad thing – it is the right of a woman (if she so wishes) to get paid for sexual activity. The fact that men can be quite impressionable, and get expectations of women that are just not realistic. She is suggesting that the viewers of porn may be being psychologically affected in such a way that it could damage their respect for women and may lead to lewd behaviour towards them.

First, she cited an experiment on television programme she had once seen. In this case, a group of 15 year old boys were shown pictures of several pairs of breasts, and were asked to choose what they thought were the most "normal". Seeing as this was anecdotal and recalled from my friend's memory, I'm not sure how well the word "normal" was defined to these boys; though she assures me that it was clearly defined as the average woman's breasts. However, one of the pairs was actually a fake - and a very good fake at that. A large percentage of the boys opted for this pair as the most "normal", usually adding that the natural ones were odd-looking.

This discussion was entirely informal, and so I was willing to take this experiment as a valid source. I could suppose a few limitations in other circumstances, such as the fact that "normal" wasn't defined well to the boys, or that maybe the natural breasts were purposely sub-normal (at least compared to the fakes)...

The conclusion of this experiment (and that of my friend's, also) was that these boys must have got their high expectations of the average woman's breasts from somewhere, and that somewhere was the media - and also took a leap that porn may have influenced their decision. After all, porn is pretty accessible through the internet, regardless of age. And even if the boys weren't that savvy, they may have seen softcore pictures in a tabloid newspaper, for example. I would tentatively agree that the media is responsible for such a result. After all, perfect breasts can be found wherever the airbrush has been – and there are few things the airbrush hasn’t touched in today’s media.

However, I would argue that porn may have the same effect, but that effect is immeasurable compared to the media’s influence. I would require some decent scientific studies to back up these claims. These have eluded me so far… In retrospect, as a 15 year old, I probably would have chosen the fake pair, as well. I’m interested to know why. It certainly wasn’t porn, in my case – I was still participating in the Catholic dogma around that time of my life. I would suspect that it was through the gaining of implicit knowledge through the media. I would see a perfect, airbrushed pair of breasts on a movie poster, and automatically add that to my list of “normal” things. I would like to see some scientific writings behind this, though.

I didn’t feel this case study lent much to her argument, though. It’s certainly interesting to see that 15 year old boys can be so impressionable, but would that apply to men? In my experience, I don’t think it does. When I watch porn, I am aware that not all women are as well-endowed as the ones I am viewing. I am aware that not all women wish to be treated the way that woman is being treated. I am aware that she isn’t lusting after me as she gazes into the camera. I’m quite struck that my friend could think I would be so suggestible! Maybe it helps that I have been cynical of the advertising and marketing business for a long time now…

Do you know of a study that demonstrates that men are, indeed, as easily influenced as my friend suggests?

It is often said that porn is degrading to women. Can you defend this viewpoint? It really comes down to a difference of opinion of what the word “respect” means, in my mind.

And possibly the most important question of all: do you enjoy porn?!


ragdish
atheist
ragdish's picture
Posts: 461
Joined: 2007-12-31
User is offlineOffline
kryters wrote:As your

kryters wrote:

As your stereotypically sex-obsessed late-teenage male, I have been very interested a one of the recent posts on these boards: Why are certain folks bothered by erotic imagery? It was partially responsible for spawning a discussion with a good female friend of mine about pornography.

My friend’s ultimate conclusion was that porn in itself is not a bad thing – it is the right of a woman (if she so wishes) to get paid for sexual activity. The fact that men can be quite impressionable, and get expectations of women that are just not realistic. She is suggesting that the viewers of porn may be being psychologically affected in such a way that it could damage their respect for women and may lead to lewd behaviour towards them.

First, she cited an experiment on television programme she had once seen. In this case, a group of 15 year old boys were shown pictures of several pairs of breasts, and were asked to choose what they thought were the most "normal". Seeing as this was anecdotal and recalled from my friend's memory, I'm not sure how well the word "normal" was defined to these boys; though she assures me that it was clearly defined as the average woman's breasts. However, one of the pairs was actually a fake - and a very good fake at that. A large percentage of the boys opted for this pair as the most "normal", usually adding that the natural ones were odd-looking.

This discussion was entirely informal, and so I was willing to take this experiment as a valid source. I could suppose a few limitations in other circumstances, such as the fact that "normal" wasn't defined well to the boys, or that maybe the natural breasts were purposely sub-normal (at least compared to the fakes)...

The conclusion of this experiment (and that of my friend's, also) was that these boys must have got their high expectations of the average woman's breasts from somewhere, and that somewhere was the media - and also took a leap that porn may have influenced their decision. After all, porn is pretty accessible through the internet, regardless of age. And even if the boys weren't that savvy, they may have seen softcore pictures in a tabloid newspaper, for example. I would tentatively agree that the media is responsible for such a result. After all, perfect breasts can be found wherever the airbrush has been – and there are few things the airbrush hasn’t touched in today’s media.

However, I would argue that porn may have the same effect, but that effect is immeasurable compared to the media’s influence. I would require some decent scientific studies to back up these claims. These have eluded me so far… In retrospect, as a 15 year old, I probably would have chosen the fake pair, as well. I’m interested to know why. It certainly wasn’t porn, in my case – I was still participating in the Catholic dogma around that time of my life. I would suspect that it was through the gaining of implicit knowledge through the media. I would see a perfect, airbrushed pair of breasts on a movie poster, and automatically add that to my list of “normal” things. I would like to see some scientific writings behind this, though.

I didn’t feel this case study lent much to her argument, though. It’s certainly interesting to see that 15 year old boys can be so impressionable, but would that apply to men? In my experience, I don’t think it does. When I watch porn, I am aware that not all women are as well-endowed as the ones I am viewing. I am aware that not all women wish to be treated the way that woman is being treated. I am aware that she isn’t lusting after me as she gazes into the camera. I’m quite struck that my friend could think I would be so suggestible! Maybe it helps that I have been cynical of the advertising and marketing business for a long time now…

Do you know of a study that demonstrates that men are, indeed, as easily influenced as my friend suggests?

It is often said that porn is degrading to women. Can you defend this viewpoint? It really comes down to a difference of opinion of what the word “respect” means, in my mind.

And possibly the most important question of all: do you enjoy porn?!

Since I was the one responsible for that post on erotic imagery, I'll be among the first responders here. I'll be unabashed and say that I LOVE PORN!!!! And I love it particularly while watching with my spouse.

I see a major flaw in your female friend's argument regarding impressionable men. I know a lot of fat women who have small breasts and are regularly getting laid. Obviously, therefore, there are a lot of men who, despite the media, go after overweight women. Why? What your female friend totally misses the boat on is that we are hardwired for sex. Men universally are attracted to women with a low waist-hip ratio and facial symmetry at a minimum. These are features that the vast majority of women possess. Now beyond that, there will of course be individual personal tastes. Citing a case study of 15 year old boys looking at pictures of boobs and deciding on what is "normal" speaks more of the flaws in the design of the study rather than what it says of 15 year old boys. Is there any evidence in evolutionary psychology or neuroscience to back up what she claims? Likely not. If she is going to present evidence, then it should be more robust scientific evidence aimed at achieving the truth. Men love women of various body types. Look at this BBW site and tell me that men don't jerk off to it:

http://www.carrieland.com/ (personally, I think Carrie looks hot)

And I bet you there are so called studies of teenage boys who find fat girls such as the one on the website as being "abnormal."

Folks who think porn is degrading are IMO hypocrites. I bet you your female friend masturbates to sexual fantasy (either written or mental imagery). One could easily make the same argument that those forms of erotic imagery are degrading to men and women and that argument (just like the anti-porn argument) would be dead wrong.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with watching consenting adults have sex. The only thing degrading is that for so long, women have been denied watching porn. It is very encouraging that more porn is being produced that appeals to a variety of tastes for men, women, gay, straight, etc..

Now can there be adverse consequences with porn (eg. addiction, self esteem issues, etc..). Of course. But there are adverse consequences with any form of pleasure (eg. alcohol, burgers and fries, violent sports, watching too much TV, etc..). And honestly, watching sex is the least likely to cause problems.

 

 

 


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Another thing missed in the

Another thing missed in the arguments claiming porn=bad in relation to body image is: The reason the trim, young woman is widely attractive is because she appears healthy. It should be obvious that a natural inclination to mate with healthy women will result in higher chances of having healthy offspring. Women select similarly.

Now, Ragdish offered up an example of an "overweight" woman's porn site. Note that she doesn't have signs of poor health (fat isn't a sign of poor health). She has even skin color, no (or no noticeable) cellulite, even complexion, youthfulness...

 

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


Desdenova
atheist
Desdenova's picture
Posts: 410
Joined: 2008-11-14
User is offlineOffline
JillSwift wrote:Another

JillSwift wrote:

Another thing missed in the arguments claiming porn=bad in relation to body image is: The reason the trim, young woman is widely attractive is because she appears healthy. It should be obvious that a natural inclination to mate with healthy women will result in higher chances of having healthy offspring. Women select similarly.

Now, Ragdish offered up an example of an "overweight" woman's porn site. Note that she doesn't have signs of poor health (fat isn't a sign of poor health). She has even skin color, no (or no noticeable) cellulite, even complexion, youthfulness...

 

Combining Occam's razor with the fact that I have the attention span of a ferret at the moment, I'm going to agree with Jill here based entirely on the fact that hers was the only post short enough for me to read. In all honesty, I lost interest as soon as I realized the thread didn't contain porn links.  Oh, look, shiny things! Gotta run.

It takes a village to raise an idiot.

Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.

Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.


spike.barnett
Superfan
spike.barnett's picture
Posts: 1018
Joined: 2008-10-24
User is offlineOffline
I can only comment on my

I can only comment on my experience, but I can say it didn't give me any weird views on sex or women.

After eating an entire bull, a mountain lion felt so good he started roaring. He kept it up until a hunter came along and shot him.

The moral: When you're full of bull, keep your mouth shut.
MySpace


latincanuck
atheist
latincanuck's picture
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2007-06-01
User is offlineOffline
JillSwift wrote:Another

JillSwift wrote:

Another thing missed in the arguments claiming porn=bad in relation to body image is: The reason the trim, young woman is widely attractive is because she appears healthy. It should be obvious that a natural inclination to mate with healthy women will result in higher chances of having healthy offspring. Women select similarly.

Now, Ragdish offered up an example of an "overweight" woman's porn site. Note that she doesn't have signs of poor health (fat isn't a sign of poor health). She has even skin color, no (or no noticeable) cellulite, even complexion, youthfulness...

 

Ya hit the nail in the head on this one Jill, a friend an I were having this exact same discussion, because he got ragged out online by a female because he had lost interest in his wife sexually,  she had gained some weight (about 40 lbs) but she didn't look healthy, which is the argument really, men are attracted usually (a good majority of us anyways) to healthy looking women, doesn't mean they have to be Paris Hilton skinny, but healthy (personally for me a real woman has curves). But the many females that we mentioned this to were upset about this and say that we should love them no matter what, are forgetting is that in the end we are animals, and what my friend and I called the law of the jungle, we still have primal urges that are genetically there in us which have us tending to look towards a healthy looking female usually, because you want to pass your genetic material the healthier female not to the one that looks out of shape and/or sick.

We know of a few of our female friends that are on the plus side but still look amazing, and we know females on the skinny side that look sickly. It's a matter of perception and desirability. In the end, it wasn't that he had fallen out of love for her, but his desire for her had dropped because she no longer looked healthy, and she is a plus size woman, and now that she lost those 40 lbs, she looks great.


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
Try not to fall out of your

Try not to fall out of your chairs, but I don't think porn has that effect. When people watch porn, they know that the porn stars are going to be attractive. People watch it to get turned on.

 

I've never been into it personally, but it sure made me suspicious of cable repair guys.

 

And you're 15? What the hell are they putting in the water?

 

 


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
In skype chat yesterday, we

In skype chat yesterday, we touched on the same topic from a slightly different angle.  It's not fun to think about, but the reality is that we are not in control of our sexual attraction.  That is, I can't look at a girl and decide to be sexually attracted to her.  I can decide to try to get to know her to see if sexual attraction develops, or I can decide to try to think about her sexually to see what happens, but in the end, sexual response is not a choice.

(I was going to avoid the obvious, but then I remembered that nothing I think is obvious seems to be obvious to most people.)  This doesn't mean you can't have sex with someone you're not attracted to, even for guys.  Any guy worth his college stories has ridden a moped at least once.  The point is that our feelings are not under our control.  Our actions can belie our feelings.  (Witness the thousands of guys who still have sex with their wives even though they stopped being attracted years ago, and the women who still suck their lard-ass husband's dick while he watches football and drinks beer.)

So, there are two different discussions we can have:  Are men generally more attracted to healthy women with proportionate figures?  Resoundingly yes.  No question.  There isn't even a way to begin to argue against this.  It's science, and it's proven beyond all reasonable, and most unreasonable doubt.  Speaking of the obvious... proportionate means 1) a shoulder to waist to hip ratio that looks approximately hourglass-like, 2) reasonable symmetry, and 3) conforms approximately to the golden ratio for trunk and head compared to legs.

If a man marries a woman who is healthy and proportionate, and she becomes disproportionate and unhealthy, will he become less sexually attracted to her?  Does the pope wear a funny hat?  Yes, of course, most of the time, he's going to be signficantly less attracted to her sexually.  Will this translate into him having sex with her less or loving her less?  Maybe, maybe not.  Sexual attraction is part of a long term bond, and not the only part.  Some men place much more emphasis on other things, so there's no way to answer this question with a blanket generalization.

Here's the bottom line.  There is simply not a question of what human males find most attractive in females.  Scientists have it down to... well... a science.  Generally speaking, fat and/or unhealthy looking women are less attractive to more males than proportionate healthy looking women.  (Yes.  I know some of you don't fit the norm.  Remember the bell curve and don't bother pointing out the obvious, mmmkay?  Also, remember that we tend to become more attracted to women we think we have a chance with.*  Take that into consideration before you brag.)

We can talk about the psychology behind this knowledge.  Think about this:  When someone has the audacity to complain in a polite social conversation about fat people being unattractive, what exactly is going on in your brain when you feel the urge to defend fat people?  Do you disagree with everything that's being said deep down in your core, or do you disagree with the speaking of it in polite company?  We're all basically aware of the rules of the game.  (If you're feeling uncomfortable with what I'm saying right now, are you uncomfortable because I'm saying it or because you believe it's patently false?)  Here's a good way of thinking of it.  The rules are part of us.  We are attracted to what we are attracted to.  Society has a habit of magnifying things and also of getting tunnel vision.  It's a scientific fact that we like young, thing women -- on average.  Society then takes every young thin woman it can find and puts them all on pedestals and TVs.  Thus, the effect is magnified.  Women who are attractive but not young and thin (read: proportionate MILF) can get a complex from watching too much TV.  They'll exaggerate what they instinctively know about the rules of human attraction, and their self esteem will suffer.

So, in a cruel twist, you get lots of women with self esteem issues -- attractive women who don't "fit the current mold" have unnecessarily low opinions of their own attractiveness as compared to the flavor of the month.  Women who genuinely are less attractive than average are even worse off because they have been knocked down an artificial rung by the myopic media.  This, IMHO, is why real knowledge of sexual attraction is helpful.  Science can prove -- and has proven -- that the flavor of the month is just that.  It's just the current fad.  The range of shapes and sizes that men naturally find attractive is much wider than the media ever portrays it.  Arm young women with this knowledge, and they become better able to stick to their own sense of style, self worth, and body image when they happen to go through a year or five of being "not traditionally beautiful."**

 

 * Again.. since nothing is obvious about sex... When we become more sexually attracted to people we think we have a chance with, our taste is changing slightly, but again, it's not under our control.  We don't decide to like less attractive women and then it magically happens.  As we discover our limitations, we unconsciously adapt to them.  That's plasticity, and it's what our brains are good at.  Consider that as we age, we tend to find people our own age more attractive than we used to, and though we may recognize the beauty of youth, it's somehow less appealing than it used to be...

** T minus... let's see... two posts before somebody says, "Hamby, I really am attracted to fat women, and there are lots of guys who are.  You're wrong!  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."  Seriously, folks.  Don't make me put the bell curve over your head and hit it with a hammer.

 

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


pablotar
pablotar's picture
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-10-23
User is offlineOffline
Hambydammit wrote: remember

Hambydammit wrote:

 remember that we tend to become more attracted to women we think we have a chance with.*  

 

If the inverse is true then I guess I now have a scientific reason as to why I've been so successful with women since I'm kinda funny looking and have no game.

Eden had a 25% murder rate and incest was rampant.


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
 Quote:If the inverse is

 

Quote:
If the inverse is true then I guess I now have a scientific reason as to why I've been so successful with women since I'm kinda funny looking and have no game.

Um... I'm not sure what you're suggesting the inverse is, but it's not just about looks.  Looks are a big part of it, of course, but I never believe men who say they get laid all the time and have no game.  We've all been around the block a time or two.  "No Game" can be very charming if played proberly.

 

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


spike.barnett
Superfan
spike.barnett's picture
Posts: 1018
Joined: 2008-10-24
User is offlineOffline
Cpt_pineapple wrote:And

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

And you're 15? What the hell are they putting in the water?

You're not serious are you?

After eating an entire bull, a mountain lion felt so good he started roaring. He kept it up until a hunter came along and shot him.

The moral: When you're full of bull, keep your mouth shut.
MySpace


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
spike.barnett

spike.barnett wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

And you're 15? What the hell are they putting in the water?

You're not serious are you?

 

I was more kidding on the square, though I'm not particularly surprised a 15 year old guy watches porn, I thought testosterone kicked in at about 17-19

 

 

 


pablotar
pablotar's picture
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-10-23
User is offlineOffline
Hambydammit wrote:

Hambydammit wrote:

 

Quote:
If the inverse is true then I guess I now have a scientific reason as to why I've been so successful with women since I'm kinda funny looking and have no game.

Um... I'm not sure what you're suggesting the inverse is, but it's not just about looks.  Looks are a big part of it, of course, but I never believe men who say they get laid all the time and have no game.  We've all been around the block a time or two.  "No Game" can be very charming if played proberly.

 

 

Hambydammit wrote:

"Also, remember that we tend to become more attracted to women we think we have a chance with."

 

I just meant women being more attracted to men they have a chance with.

 

Eden had a 25% murder rate and incest was rampant.


pablotar
pablotar's picture
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-10-23
User is offlineOffline
Cpt_pineapple

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

spike.barnett wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

And you're 15? What the hell are they putting in the water?

You're not serious are you?

 

I was more kidding on the square, though I'm not particularly surprised a 15 year old guy watches porn, I thought testosterone kicked in at about 17-19

 

My testosterone started kicking me in the groin  around 10.

Eden had a 25% murder rate and incest was rampant.


ProzacDeathWish
atheist
ProzacDeathWish's picture
Posts: 4149
Joined: 2007-12-02
User is offlineOffline
spike.barnett wrote:I can

spike.barnett wrote:

I can only comment on my experience, but I can say it didn't give me any weird views on sex or women.

  Same here, bro.  Watching porn never effected me in a negative way and as long as I own a shovel and live near a cemetary I'll continue to have all the sex I want !!!