The Star is Seen Worldwide (news release)

Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
The Star is Seen Worldwide (news release)

In December 2008 I started a topic A new 'star' appeared, watch the sky . It included a photographs just taken in my country. It was posted on December 13. Why?

On 12 December 2008 Share International distributed a news release announcing that in the very near future a large, bright star will appear in the sky visible throughout the world, night and day. Around a week later Maitreya will give His first interview on a major US television programme. Since early January 2009, sightings of the star have been reported from all over the world and more and more sightings are being sent to us daily.

I encouraged you to watch the sky for things to come. Though I wasn't sure about it at all, the promise was indeed fulfilled. (which I didn't know until the end of January) Since early January through February and even in this moment, the Star visits our sky and is being noticed, photographed and filmed by many people worldwide. Numerous photographs and videos on Youtube are the evidence for that. And the December announcement to the media is an evidence, that they knew this ahead, before it happened. I think this is very remarkable.
I have seen people to say that this is Venus, Saturn, Moon, satellite, ultra-light airplane, balloon, and so on. These hypotheses can be easily dismissed by the extraordinary features of the Star. Besides of how it's looking like, (changing shape, colors, etc) it has been also photographed as changing position quickly, and had been seen during the day as well as night, worldwide. The best way to judge is to view the photographs, watch the videos and read the letters of those who had sent them. Now with the end of March Venus shouldn't be so visible, thus the Star has the skies for itself. This is a great event, one which shouldn't escape your attention. Now it's up to you to get known with the evidence, recall if you had seen something on the sky, and make your opinion. You can still contribute the videos and photographs, and of course, you can demand on your local media to react on this event.

Here are the sources for you to look at:
The SI Star page with tenths of photographs and letters
The first video of the Star I saw (next to it are more links on another videos of the same thing from the world)
And here are also some news releases, showing that the media reacts on this as well:
http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/04-06-2009/0005001769&EDATE=
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/the-star-is-seen-worldwide,775074.shtml
http://www.scientificblogging.com/newswire/star_seen_worldwide
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/CU0904/S00155.htm

The announcement back in December is of course still on the SI News releases page. Reactions of media can be easily googled by it's title, the 'Christmas Miracle'. (for example, here)
 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Thanks - I'll check out the book as soon as I can get ILL set up with a library that has it.

I find it interesting that the author is only listed as an ambassador on his own site and not on the State Department's site.

Could it be...bat squeeze?

I'm very glad to see that! Please give me some feedback of what you think about the book, when you finish it.

I have just looked at the page and there was written that he's retired. So it might be that he prefers to call himself an ambassador, which is better than calling himself a retiree Smiling You know the saying, 'once president, always president.'
Btw, what is the 'bat squeeze'? The normal dictionary, Urban Dictionary and uncle Google didn't make that clear.

 

I was looking at lists of current and former ambassadors. It would be easier if I knew what countries he served in. I know he didn't serve in Brazil because he's not listed there.

"Bat squeeze" is a term coined by Mike Malloy, a progressive talk show host from Atlanta. He says that because he can't say bulls**t on the air.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
Well, Luminon, you are

Well, Luminon, you are clearly one wild and crazy guy.  By any chance, do you know of the Festrunk Brothers?

 

 

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:I was looking

jcgadfly wrote:

I was looking at lists of current and former ambassadors. It would be easier if I knew what countries he served in. I know he didn't serve in Brazil because he's not listed there.

I'll have to find that in the book, but from what I remember, in Brazil he was a young volunteer activist for Peace corps, which later got him the diplomatic job. (surprisingly, he's not mentioned at the Peace Corps website among notable members) As a diplomat he later was, if I remember, in South Africa and Vietnam among other places.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Well, Luminon, you are clearly one wild and crazy guy.  By any chance, do you know of the Festrunk Brothers?

 

Thanks, I'm doing my best to battle my fear and shyness, otherwise you wouldn't know that I'm wild and crazy.
As for the video, nope. None of that was familiar. (not even the language, except of a word or two) The Czechs have their vices, but different. This is rather a parody of American style by two immigrants...
A typical parodied Czech would be probably a cold, submissive but envious person who has a habit of complaining on everything but never doing anything about it. A very typical Czech vice is also malversation and stealing. (some things were even thought to be too big or heavy to be stolen - wrongly) There are good sides of the nation, like a creativity, humour and tolerance of some things. But generally, I think this nation needs to find the balls to overthrow the government again (and make sure they're locked up this time) and then another serious renaissance period, like it was in early 19th and 20th century.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
Well actually, probably

Well actually, probably only the rest of the old farts on the forums got the joke. It was a late 70's recurring comedy routine about two Chezch immigrants who had no clue of American culture.

 

Speaking personally, I would like to hear more about who you are and less about what weird stuff you are interested in. I am a psychiatric social worker and I get a hefty dose of weird just walking in the front door at work.

 

I would also like to hear more about your culture. Honestly, very little has made it over here and that was certainly heavily influenced by political considerations over the years. Apparently, your country is a bleak and very polluted place where everyone is more or less half asleep at the best of times. Asa is to be expected because you only pretend to work so that the state can pretend to pay you, which really doesn't matter because there is nothing to buy anyway.

 

Your turn. Would you tell me what you have heard about life in America?

 

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

I was looking at lists of current and former ambassadors. It would be easier if I knew what countries he served in. I know he didn't serve in Brazil because he's not listed there.

I'll have to find that in the book, but from what I remember, in Brazil he was a young volunteer activist for Peace corps, which later got him the diplomatic job. (surprisingly, he's not mentioned at the Peace Corps website among notable members) As a diplomat he later was, if I remember, in South Africa and Vietnam among other places.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Well, Luminon, you are clearly one wild and crazy guy.  By any chance, do you know of the Festrunk Brothers?

 

Thanks, I'm doing my best to battle my fear and shyness, otherwise you wouldn't know that I'm wild and crazy.
As for the video, nope. None of that was familiar. (not even the language, except of a word or two) The Czechs have their vices, but different. This is rather a parody of American style by two immigrants...
A typical parodied Czech would be probably a cold, submissive but envious person who has a habit of complaining on everything but never doing anything about it. A very typical Czech vice is also malversation and stealing. (some things were even thought to be too big or heavy to be stolen - wrongly) There are good sides of the nation, like a creativity, humour and tolerance of some things. But generally, I think this nation needs to find the balls to overthrow the government again (and make sure they're locked up this time) and then another serious renaissance period, like it was in early 19th and 20th century.

Nope - not on the lists for South Africa or Vietnam. I believe I smell a rat.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Answers in Gene Simmons

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Well actually, probably only the rest of the old farts on the forums got the joke. It was a late 70's recurring comedy routine about two Chezch immigrants who had no clue of American culture.

Yes, in these times America was viewed as a rotten, immoral place full of great, slightly perverted pleasures where everything is allowed. Similar opinion is now in the Muslim world.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Speaking personally, I would like to hear more about who you are and less about what weird stuff you are interested in. I am a psychiatric social worker and I get a hefty dose of weird just walking in the front door at work.
I am an intellectual guy with a great curiosity and interest about everything. Everything, from global political situation,  through programming to details of mating ritual of a deep sea flatfish (and humans too). A nerd, you would say, I'd say a person who has a brain and is not afraid to use it, but perhaps should be. I suffered a lot from being not social, this is why, after a few nervous breakdowns when I wasn't too far from shooting everyone around, I have estabilished a living philosophy of tolerance, sincerity, diversity, harmlessness, cooperation, good will and detachment. This is why I'm not offended by most of things other people are, they're trifles to me. This is also exactly what Creme says, I can agree from my own experience with everything he wrote about it, I have seen how valuable these qualities are. I am also a bit distrait, careless, and perhaps too modest, which reflects on my often stubble face and cheap clothes from Vietnamese shops. I love to create things, whether it is a literature, computer game, picture, or a wooden shelf box on my table, where my laptop is placed. I can often put everyone around to laughter, though I don't exactly know how. Usually by an unusual, spontaneous reaction on something, or my strange kind of humour. So this is about my fairly improved personality after years of suffering, disillusion, catharsis, meditation, and breaking of glamour. There is still a long list of fixes that have to be made, like more of a confrontation with the beauteous gender, sports and work qualification, but it seems that the potential of getting into encyclopedies is there.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
I would also like to hear more about your culture. Honestly, very little has made it over here and that was certainly heavily influenced by political considerations over the years. Apparently, your country is a bleak and very polluted place where everyone is more or less half asleep at the best of times. Asa is to be expected because you only pretend to work so that the state can pretend to pay you, which really doesn't matter because there is nothing to buy anyway.
It's a tiny, overcrowded, heavily industrialized country, but it's not bleak, unless you have to live here. It's a paradise for tourists, because everything here is incredibly diverse, like miniaturized. This is why it's very diffcult for me to generalize anything. It's the only culture I know personally, so you would have better to read the observations of foreigners first (which are hilarious for me as well) and then ask me about specific things. You can find these here:
http://www.myczechrepublic.com/czech_culture/trapasy/
http://www.svu2000.org/issues/index.htm
And specially:
http://www.ce-review.org/thematicarchives/czech/ta_czechsociety.html
A lot of that is a harsh criticism, but justified one. As for a bit obscure information, the Czech Republic is not a democracy. There can be no true democracy without a participation of people, and here, the participation is very low, and if high, then ignored and disencouraged by media. It seems more like a despotism, a private binge of the parliament and senate which we all here must pay.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Your turn. Would you tell me what you have heard about life in America? 

I have heard that America is one hell of a country. There are very big tent cities of homeless people in every city, no social system for them, no affordable healthcare, except of charity organizations like Remote Area Medical. On the other side, I have heard that other Americans have twice as big fridges as we have, and five times as full, and yet they can just let them be and go to restaurant for a dinner. These Americans are often big people who actually needs to read the silly writings on all the heaps of things they buy and throw away afterwards. (warning: may contain peanuts - a pack of peanuts) An American person can throw away any food without regret, which is a shame, when 10 millions of people per year dies from hunger. Instead of walking for 100 meters they go that distance by a car. Children are brought up without any discipline, but then they are forced to compete with other children, they're like little Pokemons of their parents. (this is also a problem in Japan and wherever the American culture steps) Furthermore, I know that nowadays it's becoming less like that, but a few years ago it was made sure that all the nation believed in evil terrorists attacking them for no reason and that America is the best country in the world ever, destined to be a master over all nations and a global policeman. This is why Americans here are viewed as a barbarianic conquerors, a paranoid, militant nation which can't be trusted, or as a new Nazi Germany on it's quest for Lebensraum (or Oilensraum perhaps) - a major source of all evils in the world. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the latest effort to estabilish a military bases here to aim missiles at the harmless, peaceful Iran and Russia are only a confirmation of that.

This is the popular bad opinion about America. However, USA has also a good, loving, mature personality, which can save the world. It manifested itself only briefly before, as the Marshall Plan which rebuilt the Europe after WW2. But when America manages to bring this quality up again, it will save the world, which desperately needs it.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Nope - not on

jcgadfly wrote:

Nope - not on the lists for South Africa or Vietnam. I believe I smell a rat.

Well, then I'm clueless. Peterson does interviews and lectures, I don't believe he could get there just out of nothing. Would his biography help? ( http://www.waynepeterson.com/bio.html ) Or should I write him for some records of his career?


 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


ProzacDeathWish
atheist
ProzacDeathWish's picture
Posts: 4149
Joined: 2007-12-02
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Answers in

Luminon wrote:

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Well actually, probably only the rest of the old farts on the forums got the joke. It was a late 70's recurring comedy routine about two Chezch immigrants who had no clue of American culture.

Yes, in these times America was viewed as a rotten, immoral place full of great, slightly perverted pleasures where everything is allowed. Similar opinion is now in the Muslim world.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Speaking personally, I would like to hear more about who you are and less about what weird stuff you are interested in. I am a psychiatric social worker and I get a hefty dose of weird just walking in the front door at work.
I am an intellectual guy with a great curiosity and interest about everything. Everything, from global political situation,  through programming to details of mating ritual of a deep sea flatfish (and humans too). A nerd, you would say, I'd say a person who has a brain and is not afraid to use it, but perhaps should be. I suffered a lot from being not social, this is why, after a few nervous breakdowns when I wasn't too far from shooting everyone around, I have estabilished a living philosophy of tolerance, sincerity, diversity, harmlessness, cooperation, good will and detachment. This is why I'm not offended by most of things other people are, they're trifles to me. This is also exactly what Creme says, I can agree from my own experience with everything he wrote about it, I have seen how valuable these qualities are. I am also a bit distrait, careless, and perhaps too modest, which reflects on my often stubble face and cheap clothes from Vietnamese shops. I love to create things, whether it is a literature, computer game, picture, or a wooden shelf box on my table, where my laptop is placed. I can often put everyone around to laughter, though I don't exactly know how. Usually by an unusual, spontaneous reaction on something, or my strange kind of humour. So this is about my fairly improved personality after years of suffering, disillusion, catharsis, meditation, and breaking of glamour. There is still a long list of fixes that have to be made, like more of a confrontation with the beauteous gender, sports and work qualification, but it seems that the potential of getting into encyclopedies is there.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
I would also like to hear more about your culture. Honestly, very little has made it over here and that was certainly heavily influenced by political considerations over the years. Apparently, your country is a bleak and very polluted place where everyone is more or less half asleep at the best of times. Asa is to be expected because you only pretend to work so that the state can pretend to pay you, which really doesn't matter because there is nothing to buy anyway.
It's a tiny, overcrowded, heavily industrialized country, but it's not bleak, unless you have to live here. It's a paradise for tourists, because everything here is incredibly diverse, like miniaturized. This is why it's very diffcult for me to generalize anything. It's the only culture I know personally, so you would have better to read the observations of foreigners first (which are hilarious for me as well) and then ask me about specific things. You can find these here:
http://www.myczechrepublic.com/czech_culture/trapasy/
http://www.svu2000.org/issues/index.htm
And specially:
http://www.ce-review.org/thematicarchives/czech/ta_czechsociety.html
A lot of that is a harsh criticism, but justified one. As for a bit obscure information, the Czech Republic is not a democracy. There can be no true democracy without a participation of people, and here, the participation is very low, and if high, then ignored and disencouraged by media. It seems more like a despotism, a private binge of the parliament and senate which we all here must pay.

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Your turn. Would you tell me what you have heard about life in America? 

I have heard that America is one hell of a country. There are very big tent cities of homeless people in every city, no social system for them, no affordable healthcare, except of charity organizations like Remote Area Medical. On the other side, I have heard that other Americans have twice as big fridges as we have, and five times as full, and yet they can just let them be and go to restaurant for a dinner. These Americans are often big people who actually needs to read the silly writings on all the heaps of things they buy and throw away afterwards. (warning: may contain peanuts - a pack of peanuts) An American person can throw away any food without regret, which is a shame, when 10 millions of people per year dies from hunger. Instead of walking for 100 meters they go that distance by a car. Children are brought up without any discipline, but then they are forced to compete with other children, they're like little Pokemons of their parents. (this is also a problem in Japan and wherever the American culture steps) Furthermore, I know that nowadays it's becoming less like that, but a few years ago it was made sure that all the nation believed in evil terrorists attacking them for no reason and that America is the best country in the world ever, destined to be a master over all nations and a global policeman. This is why Americans here are viewed as a barbarianic conquerors, a paranoid, militant nation which can't be trusted, or as a new Nazi Germany on it's quest for Lebensraum (or Oilensraum perhaps) - a major source of all evils in the world. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the latest effort to estabilish a military bases here to aim missiles at the harmless, peaceful Iran and Russia are only a confirmation of that.

This is the popular bad opinion about America. However, USA has also a good, loving, mature personality, which can save the world. It manifested itself only briefly before, as the Marshall Plan which rebuilt the Europe after WW2. But when America manages to bring this quality up again, it will save the world, which desperately needs it.

 

 Interesting description Luminon.  Are you sure you're not actually from Canada ?


ProzacDeathWish
atheist
ProzacDeathWish's picture
Posts: 4149
Joined: 2007-12-02
User is offlineOffline
  BTW Luminon, it's obvious

  BTW Luminon, it's obvious that we atheists/skeptics outnumber you on this forum and that while examining your "woo woo" some of the intensity we aim toward you can be sort of...uh, intense ?    It's sometimes very difficult to remain calm under those circumstances.

  So far you have been very durable under pressure and polite in your responses.   I tip my proverbial hat to you.


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
Ah, thank you Luminon.

Ah, thank you Luminon. People in other countries simply don't understand America and I suspect that we don't really understand other countries any better.

 

Let me take the peanut thing as an example. The fact is that I have not seen that one but I have to say that it is fairly likely. You should read the instructions that are included with our various products. For example, we have instructions included in every box of condoms. How hard can it really be to figure out how to roll a rubber thing down your dick? Apparently we need to be told. One box that I bought a while back had 13 steps to use one. Umm....

 

Affordable health care? Yah, we have it if you can afford it. Don't ask me how that makes sense, in some weird way it does. I have a great plan where my employer pays 75% of the insurance regardless of how it goes down. So I am told to pick the cheapest of 8 different options.

 

I had the cheapest insurance a few years ago. Then I slipped on ice on my way to work. I ended up having to pay USD $40 three times a week for therapy into August. After that, I switched to the most expensive plan that I can get. My employer still pays 75% and my payroll deduction is a bit larger but if I ever get hurt again, I will only pay USD $10 per week for the same service. Mind you, only 80% of us have health care at all. Except that we give free health care to the other 20% of us. Of course the free health care sucks. It sucks differently from the paid health care.

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Nope - not on the lists for South Africa or Vietnam. I believe I smell a rat.

Well, then I'm clueless. Peterson does interviews and lectures, I don't believe he could get there just out of nothing. Would his biography help? ( http://www.waynepeterson.com/bio.html ) Or should I write him for some records of his career?

 

 

I went to his bio first - It's vague enough that it got me looking in other places.

You'd probably be better off writing the records of his career. You wouldn't be the first to assist someone in padding his CV.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
ProzacDeathWish

ProzacDeathWish wrote:

 Interesting description Luminon.  Are you sure you're not actually from Canada ?

I'm not from Canada, not even genetically. But from esoteric point of view, Canada's national soul ray is the same as my own personality ray, so there may be some similarities. I have a friend artist and musician there. I also like Canada somehow, it seems like a good place to live to me. Not only to me, Canada is being flooded by Gipsy refugees who are escaping like crazy from local high welfare benefits to Canada's even higher welfare benefits Smiling Guess why CZ citizens needs visa to enter Canada. But we generally don't regret that much. There's a local joke:

News line: Romania was struck by extreme earthquakes! 50 000 Romanians dead! USA sends 100 millions of dollars! Germany sends 100 millions of euro! Czech Republic sends 50 000 of new Romanians! 


ProzacDeathWish wrote:
  BTW Luminon, it's obvious that we atheists/skeptics outnumber you on this forum and that while examining your "woo woo" some of the intensity we aim toward you can be sort of...uh, intense ?    It's sometimes very difficult to remain calm under those circumstances.

  So far you have been very durable under pressure and polite in your responses.   I tip my proverbial hat to you.

Thanks a lot, I sometimes really need that. It takes some effort to control my responses (and to leave out some really tempting, ingenious sarcasm Smiling ) but this is how I really feel that this is right. I do a lot of things because I feel they're right, because I believe that the personality is a tool to change the world, which must be developed and purified, usually through overcoming of diffculties. (of which there's no shortage here) Such is a philosophy of personal evolution and many people follows it purely intuitively, without reading any esoteric theory at all. This is a quality within us all, not a narrow path for the chosen ones of a particular religion. I actually have an impression that the RRS itself expresses the qualities which are typical for a correct esoteric discipleship or aspiracy.

I think it would be interesting for you to know how do I see the skeptical community as such. I will talk about the 5th ray of Concrete knowledge and science. This ray was, according to esoteric theory, brought here out of it's normal schedule over 100 years ago to influence the humanity to develop a technically and scientifically advanced civilization, which will serve as a good, solid basis for future development. But every ray has two modes of expression - perfect and imperfect, virtues and vices. The virtues, the great achievements of science are known to both of us, so there's no need to mention them. Now I will describe the vices, the glamours (emotional illusions) of the 5th ray. The quote is from Creme's book The Art of co-operation.

The 5th ray type, especially those with the 5th ray on the mind and physical-brain level, are so withdrawn into the mental plane, that they are very critical of those who do not see what they see. They see clearly, but in a very limited way, on a very narrow range. They are rather arrogant about their ability to see clearly, forgetting about the world of which they see nothing at all which exists outside of their limited viewpoint. Many scientists are very influenced by the 5th ray. Modern technology is a 5th ray phenomenon. There is a very sharp, clear insight into a small area and a complete lack of awareness of the bigger world, the world of different levels of consciousness. Most scientists are against any esoteric viewpoint at all. It never occurs to them that there is more to the world than they can see in the microscope and measure.

(...) All these ray-types have virtues; I am talking only about the glamours. We do not need to talk about the virtues because they will always be positive. The glamours, the vices, are the destructive tendencies.

Obviously, we have here a community of skeptics, having less or more of 5th ray in their personal make-up. A personality is the area where the vices of rays can be expressed. From time to time, a religious people comes, for whom is typical the 6th ray of Idealism and devotion. (and fanaticism and bigotry) Because the 6th ray is currently being switched off as it did enough of damage on Earth in last millenia, I welcome the skeptics' noble effort to intellectualize the theists. But here also comes my effort, to show the 5th ray personalities that there are other, also valid and important qualities of the world than the skepticism and theism, that the world is much bigger and diverse. This can be hopefully achieved by a direct, honest and polite approach... Sometimes a bit humorous analogy comes to my mind, (for those who listened closely to the RRS shows) that I can behave well in relation towards a skeptic. Then when my real identity of an esotericist is revealed, the skeptic may be surprised that I am not a baby eater as esotericists are thought to be Smiling


Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Ah, thank you Luminon. People in other countries simply don't understand America and I suspect that we don't really understand other countries any better.

Sure. I don't say this is a true opinion or that I believe in all of this. (I guess that it is too much generalized) This is a popular bad opinion which people here expresses when they need a common topic for the whole family at a festive dinner. Slandering of the invaders is a popular thing here, we've always had a plenty of them Smiling I am curious how much that opinion is true now.

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Let me take the peanut thing as an example. The fact is that I have not seen that one but I have to say that it is fairly likely. You should read the instructions that are included with our various products. For example, we have instructions included in every box of condoms. How hard can it really be to figure out how to roll a rubber thing down your dick? Apparently we need to be told. One box that I bought a while back had 13 steps to use one. Umm....
I know, such a writings appears on goods at shop because of one dumbass who gets an accident and then sues the company for hundreds of millions, not that they would be generally needed. But it's surely entertaining to other nations Smiling

 

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:
Affordable health care? Yah, we have it if you can afford it. Don't ask me how that makes sense, in some weird way it does. I have a great plan where my employer pays 75% of the insurance regardless of how it goes down. So I am told to pick the cheapest of 8 different options.

I had the cheapest insurance a few years ago. Then I slipped on ice on my way to work. I ended up having to pay USD $40 three times a week for therapy into August. After that, I switched to the most expensive plan that I can get. My employer still pays 75% and my payroll deduction is a bit larger but if I ever get hurt again, I will only pay USD $10 per week for the same service. Mind you, only 80% of us have health care at all. Except that we give free health care to the other 20% of us. Of course the free health care sucks. It sucks differently from the paid health care.

Wow... 120 USD per week, you say? That's 2400 CZK per week, and 9600 CZK per month. If I would have to pay this, I'd have 50 USD left from my monthly payroll.

I once broke my wrist. I had no special insurance at all except of a mandatory health insurance at a state-owned insurance company. I went to a doctor, he fixed my wrist for free, then after the gypsum was put down I was visiting a therapy for free and then my wrist was healed. Indeed, nowadays there is more of things paid - if you aren't sick and you need a check-up paper, it costs a few tenths of USD, and the visit costs 1,5 USD before they even look at you, but these are recent inventions. (specially the 30CZK fee which decreased a number of visitors per 50% Smiling )

In fact, the commercialism is a factor diminishing both availability and quality of life as such, and healthcare as well. There is nothing wrong with paid healthcare, as long as everyone can pay it. But if you couldn't, you would talk about it completely differently. I believe that healthcare should be made one of basic human rights, because those who need it the most, the poor, can least afford it. There is a way how to have everything for free, food, shelter, healthcare and education. There should be absolutely no commercialism and competition in social services at all! The competition always means one winning at the detriment of many, it is thus inevitably destructive. The way to have the public good for "free" is, of course, the sharing. In every company, industrial let's say, there is a tremendous profit which ends up in a pockets of a few people. The workers gets a miserable salary and from this they have to pay taxes, food, shelter, healthcare and education. If we set a maximum wage limit, and we share the profit of the industry, then everyone can get paid better and the remaining majority of excessive money will be put into the public service - for things like a free healthcare or building of roads, let's say. The sharing is always more profitable than competition, it is constructive, not destructive. The sharing makes justice and justice makes peace. In peace there is no social unrest and thus there are no expenses to keep the unrest calm by force. The price of forceful, unjust order is more expensive than the price of peace and must be paid every year.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
Canada being flooded with

Canada being flooded with gypsies? Really?

 

 

I dated a guy from Prague once.  I think he was half off his rocker with strange newly created beliefs (is this common?)

 

 

Is there really a need to start NEW irrational beliefs? Aren't there enough already?

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:Canada being

ClockCat wrote:

Canada being flooded with gypsies? Really?

Well, as for the flooding, you have to see it in measures of our small nation and Canada's even smaller number of people who are allowed to immigrate, but in that range, it's true. Last year there had been 853 requests for asylum in Canada, and almost half of them were Romes. But it's still nothing to Mexican immigrants, of whom there was allowed about 9000 last year. So it's a good deal - we get rid of some of our local Indians, and Canada won't mind it too much. Not that I would have a personal problem with Romes (I don't live in the city nor near them) but their closed communities have a real problems and thus causes also problems to others around and my friends knows a lot of stories.

ClockCat wrote:
I dated a guy from Prague once.  I think he was half off his rocker with strange newly created beliefs (is this common?)
What beliefs, please? I'm curious. 
Technically, I don't know much about beliefs. I usually act with conviction which comes from experience. So theoretically, if there is a new, unusual experience or more of them, the person may see this as a rational necessity to accept this as a fact. And the result may look like as a newly created belief, while it may be not.
On the other side, it definitely is a new belief, if something unusual happens to a person, and he somehow assumes for no reason, that it was done by a guy called Jahweh who created the Earth in 6 days 6000 years ago and has a strange liking in killing of his or other people's sons. I really don't like that kind of assumption.

ClockCat wrote:
Is there really a need to start NEW irrational beliefs? Aren't there enough already?

Well, the need is definitely there - we are in all kinds of crises we can think of, people suffer, and they search for a way out. In that process, a lot of less or more succesful attempts is done, and among them, a beliefs may appear. For example, Scientology was created by a highly charismatic and influential sci-fi writer who claimed that his religion can increase a quality of life and unfold one's full potential. Generally speaking, our quality of life is very low and our potential is wasted, thanks to the commercialization, so the answer is, that we need to start ANEW, somehow.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Here is a collection of

Here is a collection of videos of the Star. You should notice, that the object on Costa Rica, Bulgaria, Lake Ontario (and other) videos looks exactly the same. I think this is a serious thing which can't have an ordinary, easy explanation. Now it is obvious that this object has a specific, diamond-like shape, that it appears high in our atmosphere, and there it also disappears at it's will. Multiple different cameras showed that at various circumstances. I think it is reasonable to recognize it as a fact.

I think this is a good opportunity for all the freethinkers to show how open-minded they are Smiling

www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LrOkAmNLwM&feature=related  (Costa Rica, January 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyKw1PVXFhw  (Manhattan, January 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u1D-WJsz40&feature=related  (Lake  Ontario, January 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=62Nk-zSJCzk&feature=related  
(Pasadena, California, January 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=x21lmKI7jrY&feature=related  (Georgia, December 2008)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9V-sJYnZ0Y&feature=related
   (Vienna, January 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbLi0CXllMc&feature=related   (Dijon, France, March 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3Q0ALTOOQ8&feature=related
 (Sofia, Bulgaria, March 2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=knPQVty2TwM&feature=related
   (Slough, UK, March  2009)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7M1TncdvMw&feature=related

www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNlH9zLzot4   (Miracle star film)

Btw, our private newsletter also comments the photographs of sun with the Star being near it. Some of the photographs (unpublished) were indeed solar flares, some were the Star, and some had both solar flares and the Star on them. A possible explanation why the Star is so often in the direct sun line, is that it is solar-powered and it recharges itself there.
 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


treat2 (not verified)
Posts: 4294964976
Joined: 1969-12-31
User is offlineOffline
Personally, I would look up

Personally, I would look up what NASA has to say about it, not to mention the websites of reputable observatories, and websites run by noted astronomers.

I'm not an astronomy freak, but I know enough to do that before posting anything about the thread-post, or the thread-poster.

As to the web sites that the thread-poster referred to, I'm not familiar with them, but as I'm not an astronomy freak that's not surprising. ON THE OTHER HAND... blogs and similar amateur shit are not what I think of as reputable sites that I would use to formulate any opinion. And from what I saw of the links referred to in the thread post, there seemed to be an abundance of such links, and none which pointed to anything I would anticipate I would have been even remotely familiar with.

The discovery of a new star is not too exciting to me, and the brightness of anything can be altered. The articles and blogs that I gave a very cursery reading of, did not appear to be of the quality that even mentioned up front, such vitals as the distance of the star from Earth, what solar system it's in and the like.

Hubble would certainly be another site that would be one to check out such stuff, for those that are interested in reliable untouched pics.


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
 I have looked at the first

 I have looked at the first three.

All they show when they zoom in is a grossly out of focus blur framed by the shape of the lens opening in the camera.

The first is a diamond typical of a partially closed down aperture with a two-bladed diaphram, the first is the circular shape of a fully open lens, the third is like the first but quite a bit flatter.

So they clearly are not showing any detail at all of the object, and are not even 'exactly the same' in any way, contrary to your assertion.

Thanks Luminon, further proof of how totally unqualified you are to assess this crap.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


spike.barnett
Superfan
spike.barnett's picture
Posts: 1018
Joined: 2008-10-24
User is offlineOffline
How is this thread still

How is this thread still alive?


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:D

Some of us are still busy laughing.

 

 

Have a look at http://www.wikisky.org/ and tell me which star it is you think you see, k?

 

Put in your location and it will show you a skymap of what would be available to you.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote: I have

BobSpence1 wrote:

 I have looked at the first three.

All they show when they zoom in is a grossly out of focus blur framed by the shape of the lens opening in the camera.


All right, oh lord of conventional thinking. If you think that people capable of using camera and computer are stupid enough to not manage a simple task of visual comparison, your confidence in humanity must be very low indeed. As for me, a sudden global epidemy of  stellar hallucinations is beyond my belief. I saw what I saw, I was there, and not only me.

ClockCat wrote:

Some of us are still busy laughing.

Have a look at http://www.wikisky.org/ and tell me which star it is you think you see, k?

 

Put in your location and it will show you a skymap of what would be available to you.

Ok, fourth explanation: it's no burning globe of hydrogen, it's UFO called "the (Xmas) Star". This is why it appears, does a colourful light show over a location for a time and then disappears. It's a sign, a symbollic repeating of the "star of the East" which according to the legend guided three wise men to the newborn JC. Of course, there is a lot of signs related to other cultures and traditions (and also these completely unrelated).

The civilizations does exist in about 2150 years cycles. We have a lot of legends from the beginning of our culture, which was about 2000 years ago. Now we are in a transitory, critical phase when the old civilization dies and we have a task of building a new one, with a new ways of thinking, acting and living. This transitory time is thus rich with signs of all kinds to awaken the humanity's self-awareness and to start the new civilization, because the only alternative is self-destruction.
It is thus beneficial to raise a discussion on our media about the plentiful miraculous events, signs on the sky and land, new trends in society and a breakdown of the old systems and methods. The global interest in ecology and charity is a first sign of humanity's maturing, but such a tendencies must be constantly supported and encouraged.


spike.barnett wrote:

How is this thread still alive?

The event is probably still going on, and even if not, there are news which needs to be passed down to more people.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Thanks

BobSpence1 wrote:
Thanks Luminon, further proof of how totally unqualified you are to assess this crap.
I, too, would like to thank Luminon for always being there when I need to feel way smarter than someone.


 

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
JillSwift wrote:BobSpence1

JillSwift wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:
Thanks Luminon, further proof of how totally unqualified you are to assess this crap.
I, too, would like to thank Luminon for always being there when I need to feel way smarter than someone.

So basically, you feel smart if someone disagrees with you, (like me) and you also feel smart if someone agrees with you. (like when someone confirms your thoughts)  Well, that's ingenious Smiling

I should not care if anyone agrees or disagrees with me.


 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon, when you saw what

Luminon, when you saw what you saw, were you with others at a spot that washyped up as the place where Maitreya's sign would appear?

Were you being told to continually be on the lookout for said sign from Maitreya?

I can't help but suspect that it is much like the Fatima hoopla. If one looks for anything long enough, it will be found or created as needed.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:S

It's a shame there is no evidence yet of any kind of UFO light appearing. Let alone the lack of existence of any large amount of people mentioning or talking about it.

 

The only thing I have heard about lately is swine flu. If there was some kind of mystical thing in the sky it'd be news everywhere.

 

 




No evidence, no prominent firsthand accounts, and  bunch of blurry photos means....it's on the same level of existence as Santa and Bigfoot.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:So basically,

Luminon wrote:
So basically, you feel smart if someone disagrees with you, (like me) and you also feel smart if someone agrees with you. (like when someone confirms your thoughts)  Well, that's ingenious Smiling



I should not care if anyone agrees or disagrees with me.

Really? You think this is about agreement?

It is about you claiming proof of a UFO when the images are all obviously camera lens artifacts. I don't think you're an idiot because I disagree with you, I think you're an idiot because you're awaiting some celestial being on the basis of photos of blurry lens flares.

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Luminon, you are doing a lot

Luminon, you are doing a lot of damage to any serious investigation of these mysteries and non-conventional studies by your extremely uncritical acceptance of such really poor 'evidence'. It makes it so much easier to dismiss the whole subject area, when you present as evidence such obvious misinterpretations of very simple effects. 

I am not saying I take any of it seriously myself, but if there really is something worth investigating, you are really damaging the prospects of anyone bothering to look into it.

 

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Luminon, when

jcgadfly wrote:

Luminon, when you saw what you saw, were you with others at a spot that washyped up as the place where Maitreya's sign would appear?

Were you being told to continually be on the lookout for said sign from Maitreya?

I can't help but suspect that it is much like the Fatima hoopla. If one looks for anything long enough, it will be found or created as needed.

I see what you mean. But people from our group saw things, which are beyond scientific explanations. On multiple ocassions, our lecture sessions were visited by a man, who controlled his visibility. He was visible to some people at one moment, and then invisible to them and visible only to the rest, while his voice was still heard. The people who couldn't suddenly see him, saw their friend talking to a thin air and hearing answers from the air. That was one lecture.
On another lecture on a festival in a sports hall, my parents also saw that man to walk directly between tough guys of the security guards. The guards checked everyone entering there with a great care (and their tickets), even those who had been a lecturers in that hall. But that tall, very remarkable man walked between the guards without them even turning their sight to him. And he was no boss there, he was later seen also just walking among the stalls in the hall, as a common visitor.

This phenomenon is reported from many places in the world. People at demonstrations for global sharing and peace ocassionally reports being loudly greeted, cheered up and encouraged by a strange man, who despite of his very striking and loud behavior may be completely unnoticed even in a dense crowd, except of those he chooses to be visible to.
The signs from Maitreya are of great variety and less or more remarkable, but there is a plenty of those which can't possibly be a coincidence. And for the rest, the enormous amount of the same or very similar "coincidences" reported from all around the world, is beyond a possibility of coincidence.


ClockCat wrote:

It's a shame there is no evidence yet of any kind of UFO light appearing. Let alone the lack of existence of any large amount of people mentioning or talking about it.

As for the existence, if photographs and videos are not good for you, you can watch the sky for yourself. But the occurence of people seeing them, let the UFOs alone, is regional. Almost all people I know saw UFO. There are some places where their maneuvers are more frequent, but generally, they're on all our skies. The problem is, that when the UFO is not moving, it is often mistaken for a star, and when it's moving, then for an airplane or satellite. Only seeing it to move in various directions can catch an attention more easily. We are otherwise conditioned to remove from our mind anything which does not fit with our upbringing and beliefs. Nobody is open-minded. We think we are, (which is a delusion) but practically nobody is. No skeptics, no atheists, no freethinkers. Not even me, I only have a broader experience to which I can compare things. It even reaches into our brain's sight sense. I don't know how it is with women, but some guys really notices only what they know of in advance.
 

 

ClockCat wrote:
The only thing I have heard about lately is swine flu. If there was some kind of mystical thing in the sky it'd be news everywhere.
This is a big, unfortunate delusion. Thinking that if it is something important, you'd already know about it, is a completely unjustified assumption. The media behaves strictly according to market forces, otherwise they do not survive in concurence. Specially the big media. They show only what is easy to sell, easy to make profit. But an old, still unsolved, unpredictable and uncontrollable mystery is not beneficial for the consumer mentality, specially if it would turn an attention to some important things. What would a visitors of outer space think, seeing us killing each other, causing misery to billions of our own brothers and sisters? This is a kind of question which does not fit with the profitable consumer mentality, which the market forces must maintain, in order to survive and thrive. This is no conspiracy, it is simply a blind market mechanism, which we equally blindly follow. Just business.
(The "Star" was as far as I know featured only in local newspapers, like in Norwegia)


 

ClockCat wrote:
 
No evidence, no prominent firsthand accounts, and  bunch of blurry photos means....it's on the same level of existence as Santa and Bigfoot.

Hey, president Carter's testimony was not enough for you?

 


JillSwift wrote:

Really? You think this is about agreement?

No, I was just having a bit of sarcastic humour.

JillSwift wrote:
It is about you claiming proof of a UFO when the images are all obviously camera lens artifacts. I don't think you're an idiot because I disagree with you, I think you're an idiot because you're awaiting some celestial being on the basis of photos of blurry lens flares.

This is what I wrote to ClockCat. You are conditioned to see camera lens artifacts. You can not seriously imagine a possibility of UFO's existence, and this sub-consciously interferes with your examination of available materials, testimonies and even the sky observation.

 

My conditioning is different. I saw Venus, Jupiter, airplanes and so on, but when I was a young, unconditioned child, I also saw a genuine UFO, together with my younger brother. My subconscious mechanism allows the existence of UFO. I have a real interest to differ which photographs or videos are UFO, and which are a normal objects. But you are not capable of that, though you think so. You are conditioned to dismiss everything except of a direct, close encounter, which is very unlikely to happen.

 

You can differ a somewhat open-minded person from a closed-minded person very simply. A somewhat open-minded person is able to take some responsibility on himself for it being true or not, and to sacrifice some time and effort to that cause. A closed-minded person, a vain skeptic, will refuse to undertake any responsibility, but will only wait for results which will 100% surely not endanger his position in front of other vain skeptics.

I'm sorry if this is offensive, but among a skeptic-only community it is easy to not see your mistakes and limitations. Nobody is perfect, not even skeptics are. Realizing your limitations is the first step to overcome them.


 

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Luminon, when you saw what you saw, were you with others at a spot that washyped up as the place where Maitreya's sign would appear?

Were you being told to continually be on the lookout for said sign from Maitreya?

I can't help but suspect that it is much like the Fatima hoopla. If one looks for anything long enough, it will be found or created as needed.

I see what you mean. But people from our group saw things, which are beyond scientific explanations. On multiple ocassions, our lecture sessions were visited by a man, who controlled his visibility. He was visible to some people at one moment, and then invisible to them and visible only to the rest, while his voice was still heard. The people who couldn't suddenly see him, saw their friend talking to a thin air and hearing answers from the air. That was one lecture.
On another lecture on a festival in a sports hall, my parents also saw that man to walk directly between tough guys of the security guards. The guards checked everyone entering there with a great care (and their tickets), even those who had been a lecturers in that hall. But that tall, very remarkable man walked between the guards without them even turning their sight to him. And he was no boss there, he was later seen also just walking among the stalls in the hall, as a common visitor.

This phenomenon is reported from many places in the world. People at demonstrations for global sharing and peace ocassionally reports being loudly greeted, cheered up and encouraged by a strange man, who despite of his very striking and loud behavior may be completely unnoticed even in a dense crowd, except of those he chooses to be visible to.
The signs from Maitreya are of great variety and less or more remarkable, but there is a plenty of those which can't possibly be a coincidence. And for the rest, the enormous amount of the same or very similar "coincidences" reported from all around the world, is beyond a possibility of coincidence.


 

Controlled his visibility or escaped people's notice?

ClockCat wrote:

It's a shame there is no evidence yet of any kind of UFO light appearing. Let alone the lack of existence of any large amount of people mentioning or talking about it.

As for the existence, if photographs and videos are not good for you, you can watch the sky for yourself. But the occurence of people seeing them, let the UFOs alone, is regional. Almost all people I know saw UFO. There are some places where their maneuvers are more frequent, but generally, they're on all our skies. The problem is, that when the UFO is not moving, it is often mistaken for a star, and when it's moving, then for an airplane or satellite. Only seeing it to move in various directions can catch an attention more easily. We are otherwise conditioned to remove from our mind anything which does not fit with our upbringing and beliefs. Nobody is open-minded. We think we are, (which is a delusion) but practically nobody is. No skeptics, no atheists, no freethinkers. Not even me, I only have a broader experience to which I can compare things. It even reaches into our brain's sight sense. I don't know how it is with women, but some guys really notices only what they know of in advance.
 

 

ClockCat wrote:
The only thing I have heard about lately is swine flu. If there was some kind of mystical thing in the sky it'd be news everywhere.
This is a big, unfortunate delusion. Thinking that if it is something important, you'd already know about it, is a completely unjustified assumption. The media behaves strictly according to market forces, otherwise they do not survive in concurence. Specially the big media. They show only what is easy to sell, easy to make profit. But an old, still unsolved, unpredictable and uncontrollable mystery is not beneficial for the consumer mentality, specially if it would turn an attention to some important things. What would a visitors of outer space think, seeing us killing each other, causing misery to billions of our own brothers and sisters? This is a kind of question which does not fit with the profitable consumer mentality, which the market forces must maintain, in order to survive and thrive. This is no conspiracy, it is simply a blind market mechanism, which we equally blindly follow. Just business.
(The "Star" was as far as I know featured only in local newspapers, like in Norwegia)


 

ClockCat wrote:
 
No evidence, no prominent firsthand accounts, and  bunch of blurry photos means....it's on the same level of existence as Santa and Bigfoot.

Quote:
Hey, president Carter's testimony was not enough for you?

It wouldn't be the first time Carter's name has been attached to a bogus claim. It reminds me of that US ambassador you cited who seems to have no record of working in the State Department.

 


JillSwift wrote:

Really? You think this is about agreement?

No, I was just having a bit of sarcastic humour.

JillSwift wrote:
It is about you claiming proof of a UFO when the images are all obviously camera lens artifacts. I don't think you're an idiot because I disagree with you, I think you're an idiot because you're awaiting some celestial being on the basis of photos of blurry lens flares.

This is what I wrote to ClockCat. You are conditioned to see camera lens artifacts. You can not seriously imagine a possibility of UFO's existence, and this sub-consciously interferes with your examination of available materials, testimonies and even the sky observation.

 

My conditioning is different. I saw Venus, Jupiter, airplanes and so on, but when I was a young, unconditioned child, I also saw a genuine UFO, together with my younger brother. My subconscious mechanism allows the existence of UFO. I have a real interest to differ which photographs or videos are UFO, and which are a normal objects. But you are not capable of that, though you think so. You are conditioned to dismiss everything except of a direct, close encounter, which is very unlikely to happen.

 

You can differ a somewhat open-minded person from a closed-minded person very simply. A somewhat open-minded person is able to take some responsibility on himself for it being true or not, and to sacrifice some time and effort to that cause. A closed-minded person, a vain skeptic, will refuse to undertake any responsibility, but will only wait for results which will 100% surely not endanger his position in front of other vain skeptics.

I'm sorry if this is offensive, but among a skeptic-only community it is easy to not see your mistakes and limitations. Nobody is perfect, not even skeptics are. Realizing your limitations is the first step to overcome them.


 

 

the problem is not that it's a UFO - the problem is that you've identified it as the coming of Maitreya without looking at other possibilities.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Controlled

jcgadfly wrote:

Controlled his visibility or escaped people's notice?

Controlled his visibility. Literally. He was otherwise impossible to not to be noticed. He was very tall, and behaved very unusually. For example, he came as a complete stranger to a private group meeting where everyone knew each other. He talked with my mother in Czech language, though it took place in neighbouring country and everyone else there were Slovaks (including my father). He couldn't possibly know or even expect that there will be any non-Slovak people. Furthermore, he obviously avoided conversation despite of people being curious about him (like he would know only a few words of Czech language) and he said he knew about this meeting "from the programme". No such programme ever existed. Originally, he was seen by everyone, but when he had this brief talk with my mother, he was invisible to those watching, (to their amazement) only his speech was heard.
According to numerous reports from the world, it is M's usual behavior to appear somewhere, remarkable like a proverbial "fist on eye" and let people wonder, "Could it possibly be Maitreya?" Disguises like a man in tuxedo but with plush slippers were also reported. He has a great sense of humour and often has riddles in the meaning of his disguises. Recognizing him (or not) is also a kind of game.


jcgadfly wrote:
the problem is not that it's a UFO - the problem is that you've identified it as the coming of Maitreya without looking at other possibilities.

The point is, that my source predicted it so - at least month before the UFO started it's worldwide tour, as predicted and promised. This is how it gained credibility in connection with Maitreya. Other possibilities are unlikely, specially when the star-like UFO shone around a day on Maitreya's famous news-documented appearance in Nairobi, 1988. In Creme's books, the cooperation between this planet's Hierarchy (of which Maitreya is a head) and other planets' hierarchies (and their people in their space crafts) is greatly emphasized and is deeply described.


 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:This is what I

Luminon wrote:
This is what I wrote to ClockCat. You are conditioned to see camera lens artifacts. You can not seriously imagine a possibility of UFO's existence, and this sub-consciously interferes with your examination of available materials, testimonies and even the sky observation.

 

My conditioning is different. I saw Venus, Jupiter, airplanes and so on, but when I was a young, unconditioned child, I also saw a genuine UFO, together with my younger brother. My subconscious mechanism allows the existence of UFO. I have a real interest to differ which photographs or videos are UFO, and which are a normal objects. But you are not capable of that, though you think so. You are conditioned to dismiss everything except of a direct, close encounter, which is very unlikely to happen.

 

You can differ a somewhat open-minded person from a closed-minded person very simply. A somewhat open-minded person is able to take some responsibility on himself for it being true or not, and to sacrifice some time and effort to that cause. A closed-minded person, a vain skeptic, will refuse to undertake any responsibility, but will only wait for results which will 100% surely not endanger his position in front of other vain skeptics.

I'm sorry if this is offensive, but among a skeptic-only community it is easy to not see your mistakes and limitations. Nobody is perfect, not even skeptics are. Realizing your limitations is the first step to overcome them.

If you ever provided any corroborating evidence for your silly conclusion, I might feel your explanation had some credence.

However, this explanation claiming that the rest of us are "conditioned" in some way just makes me laugh. This is nothing more than the "in-group reinforced sense of superiority" that has always been at the center of bolstering religion, pseudoscience, and other glib nonsense.

If you were actually open-minded, deary, you'd consider that possibility rather than simply make an assertion.

In the meantime, everyone here who actually is open minded awaits real evidence that can't be more simply explained. Until and unless such new evidence appears, there is no real reason to think those photos are anything other than lens flares, and that the testimonials are just group-think.

 

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:D

I predict a star will flicker somewhere soon. This is not due to atmospheric conditions, clouds of dust and gasses, or anything else.

 

 

It is me waving my celestial hand in front of it very very fast. In space.

 

 

 

 

Worship me, my coming to share enlightenment with you all is nigh!

 

 

 

 

 

Remember that anyone who says this is a lie are conditioned to believe that. They do not yet understand like you, my followers do. We have an exlusivity on truth, everyone else walks in the dark. The truth of my coming is your light! Bathe in it, like an apple rolled in caramel. The apple is your brain, and the caramel is the delicious sweet faith you have!

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:Remember that

ClockCat wrote:
Remember that anyone who says this is a lie are conditioned to believe that. They do not yet understand like you, my followers do. We have an exlusivity on truth, everyone else walks in the dark. The truth of my coming is your light! Bathe in it, like an apple rolled in caramel. The apple is your brain, and the caramel is the delicious sweet faith you have!

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
JillSwift wrote:If you ever

JillSwift wrote:

If you ever provided any corroborating evidence for your silly conclusion, I might feel your explanation had some credence.

In the meantime, everyone here who actually is open minded awaits real evidence that can't be more simply explained. Until and unless such new evidence appears, there is no real reason to think those photos are anything other than lens flares, and that the testimonials are just group-think.

I did, that's the funny thing about it Smiling I provided videos and photographs. People see an object on the sky which wasn't there before and after, and they record it on camera. It is a real object on which they aimed a camera, and on which they focused the lens - enough to see it's shape and structure. Lens flare is a very impermanent effect on camera's image, not a real object to observe. The people were and are observing a real object, they aimed their cameras towards it - not towards a lens flare.

 


JillSwift wrote:
However, this explanation claiming that the rest of us are "conditioned" in some way just makes me laugh. This is nothing more than the "in-group reinforced sense of superiority" that has always been at the center of bolstering religion, pseudoscience, and other glib nonsense.
What you think about me is untrue. We all are conditioned. There is no exception among us. If we had an upbringing, parents, teachers, television, friends or enemies, all that affected us, conditioned us, almost totally. It is theoretically possible to live without conditioning, but not in present civilization.

Furthermore, I do everything to not promote any impression of "in-group reinforced sense of superiority". This is an bad, absurd thing to have and your assertion shows how little you know about me. All the message of esoterics and new ways of thinking says, that we are One. Thinking that I am worse or better than anyone else is a glamour. (emotional illusion) Equally the separation is a glamour. The sense of separation is what makes people commit crimes against society. We allow a terrible suffering to happen in the world, because we feel separated from the people overseas or just a few districts away in the city. There is no way I would ever want to have "in-group reinforced sense of superiority". In fact, the New Age groups are in average the most glamoured of all and the least effective of all. Politic and scientific groups are much more effective. A part of my message is an assertion that the politic and scientific groups are not all groups that there are, and that we are One with other groups. The aim is unity. Not uniformity, but unity - an appreciation of differences and cooperation.

You are accustomed to hearing of sects celebrating their superiority, and thus you are conditioned to see me as an example of that behavior, which is far from truth. Many journalists failed on that, because they expected a sect and found a seemingly disparate blend of cultures, traditions, people, and historical periods.

JillSwift wrote:
  If you were actually open-minded, deary, you'd consider that possibility rather than simply make an assertion.
I already considered the possibilities. I had thought of it, but no other possibility was so much possible. You, on the other side automatically prefer the only explanations known to you - the ones you call natural. For me, the Hierarchy and Soace Brothers are natural also and I divide the probability equally between them and so-called natural explanations. I am allowed to do this, because I am and I was and our group was, where the evidence was at the moment. In that more equal arrangement, my results have their origin. If you would share my experiences, you would come to the same assumption, because in these circumstances it's logical. Now I can give out the information about my findings, which are also findings of many people worldwidely, possibly millions.

 

ClockCat wrote:
Remember that anyone who says this is a lie are conditioned to believe that. They do not yet understand like you, my followers do. We have an exlusivity on truth, everyone else walks in the dark. The truth of my coming is your light! Bathe in it, like an apple rolled in caramel. The apple is your brain, and the caramel is the delicious sweet faith you have!
 

Maitreya had always been busy with repeating "Do not worship me. If you run after me, you will lose me. Do not try to put me in your pocket." There are articles and books warning about the misty-eyed mysticism, and other glamours of all kinds.
Fuck that.
"Man must act and implement his will," is the quote.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Luminut, you wouldn't know

Luminut, you wouldn't know corroborating evidence if it were chewing on your ass.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon,There are those here

Luminon,

There are those here who are big fans of Occam's Razor, where "the explanation that introduces  the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities is likely to be the correct one".

The explanation brought forth by you and Creme introduces:

- Maitreya

- the Space Brothers

- UFOs

The explanation others have brought to you introduces:

- Lens artifacts

Do you see why we're more than a little skeptical?

For me, one of my problems is that there is nothing behind the claims except the word of you, Creme and his Master (whoever that is).

I also have a problem with the "overshadowing" pictures. What makes them not pictures produced while jiggling the camera? I only have the word of the photographer (who may bein Creme's employ), Creme, his Master, and you. I don't know you well enough to take you at your word yet.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


HisWillness
atheistRational VIP!
HisWillness's picture
Posts: 4100
Joined: 2008-02-21
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:They do not

ClockCat wrote:

They do not yet understand like you, my followers do. We have an exlusivity on truth, everyone else walks in the dark. The truth of my coming is your light! Bathe in it, like an apple rolled in caramel. The apple is your brain, and the caramel is the delicious sweet faith you have!

Gracious Cosmic Moose? Is that you? On ... the Internet??

Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Luminon,There

jcgadfly wrote:

Luminon,

There are those here who are big fans of Occam's Razor, where "the explanation that introduces  the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities is likely to be the correct one".

The explanation brought forth by you and Creme introduces:

- Maitreya

- the Space Brothers

- UFOs

The explanation others have brought to you introduces:

- Lens artifacts

Do you see why we're more than a little skeptical?

For me, one of my problems is that there is nothing behind the claims except the word of you, Creme and his Master (whoever that is).

I think this short speech of his can give you some answer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djXiEW5P38Y
My part in this is, that my and my group's experience supports what he says. So it's my duty to not be silent about it, but to support his story. But I am just one man and I have an authority of one man, unless it is supported by a growing number of those with the same experiences. If enough of people confirms that story, there will be a public interest and considering that it might be true. The recognition and public debate about Maitreya's priorities and nature is the goal, not their necessary immediate acceptance. The state of the world is the best evidence for Creme's information, the problem is mainly in imperfect image in media of that world. There had been some reaction of media on that, but not enough and often not a serious one. The whole message, priorities and insights into our time are, I think, very valuable no matter who says them. I think they express my personal opinion very well, and in better words. With or without Creme, realization of these priorities can do the job. It is not the charismatic personalities I follow, it is the ideals they follow as well.

As for the Occam's razor, our experiences requires a full explantory power of the esoteric theory. Maitreya proved his alliance with Creme. It would require you to learn about the concepts of "mayavirupa" and "familiar", but Maitreya did appear several times to people, looking like Creme. In one local city, our group co-worker saw a man looking exactly like Creme, just with hair of inverted (black) color. That man had in his hand a newspaper with english titles. That newspaper had an unusual, large format which is typical for newspapers like  Times, but which is not used in this country at all. (I guess now she meant the broadsheet format)
But that's only a testimony. I can be well satisfied if you only consider for yourself the principles of global sharing of excesses, the laws of life, the teaching on harmlessness and correct relationships, and so on. But these I'd introduce separately, another time. If you think these things are right, you can at least agree with me about something.

Btw, I probably don't understand the problem with lens flares. I take it as what I saw - an unusual object on the sky, which is afterwards filmed or photographed. In some cases, it looks like a lens flare, but it is not, it's less or more how that object looks like, when zoomed in. Lens flare does not exist, is an effect happening inside of a camera. People had to aim the camera at something real, first. Probably that UFO which I saw, which people from our group saw, and which is being reported from all the world to the SI magazine.

jcgadfly wrote:
I also have a problem with the "overshadowing" pictures. What makes them not pictures produced while jiggling the camera? I only have the word of the photographer (who may bein Creme's employ), Creme, his Master, and you. I don't know you well enough to take you at your word yet.

The comment on the overshadowing photograph is, if I remember, that there is visible another silhouette, with clothes not matching mr. Creme's. Honestly, I don't recognize it that clearly to say anything about it for sure, not this one.
I take care to try things I can personally, and I haven't yet met mr. Creme, nor I have photographed him during the overshadowing. Nearest he was in Munchen last year and an unfortunate financial coincidence with penalty for driving too fast stopped us from going there.
However, our group has some experiences with sound and image recording electronic devices in presence of a strong spiritual energies. The sound may be unusually muffled and spumed, and the photographs can bear a signs of energy as mentioned. Some such a photographs were featured in the SI magazine. I believe I saw there a blurs of energy which aimed at people's head tops or were partially covered by a person closer to the camera, which suggests that they were happening in a 3D space. So theoretically it would be possible that a similar thing happens with mr. Creme when he's overshadowed, but I can't say for sure. There are other aspects of mr. Creme's mission which we have more experienced.


 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Jacob Cordingley
SuperfanBronze Member
Jacob Cordingley's picture
Posts: 1484
Joined: 2007-03-18
User is offlineOffline
natural wrote: Japan: Two

natural wrote:

 

Japan: Two photographs of the sunset, taken three minutes apart at 5.20pm on
15 February 2009
in Inuyama-shi by M.S. The star can be seen in two different positions.
Inuyama-shi 2/1 Japan: Please, see note on left and the letter above. Inuyama-shi 2/2

I haven't read the whole thread, but I'm wondering if anyone picked up on this. In the first photograph the "star" is in front of a hill. Now, maybe this is just me, but celestial objects rarely appear to be in front of objects on Earth. Presumably this is essential for something to even be described as celestial. Now, I don't mean to be rude, but anyone who thinks this to be a star must have some sort of cognitive deficiency.

 


Kevin R Brown
Superfan
Kevin R Brown's picture
Posts: 3142
Joined: 2007-06-24
User is offlineOffline
Luminon already pointed that

Luminon already pointed that out. To him, it's 'proof' that the 'object' is supernatural.

 

Man, his dad has really fucked him up.

Quote:
"Natasha has just come up to the window from the courtyard and opened it wider so that the air may enter more freely into my room. I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and the clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full."

- Leon Trotsky, Last Will & Testament
February 27, 1940


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Jacob Cordingley wrote:I

Jacob Cordingley wrote:

I haven't read the whole thread, but I'm wondering if anyone picked up on this. In the first photograph the "star" is in front of a hill. Now, maybe this is just me, but celestial objects rarely appear to be in front of objects on Earth. Presumably this is essential for something to even be described as celestial. Now, I don't mean to be rude, but anyone who thinks this to be a star must have some sort of cognitive deficiency.

OK, explaining for the fifth time, the "Star" is not a celestial object, but UFO. I'm curious how many times I'll have to explain it.



Kevin R Brown wrote:
Luminon already pointed that out. To him, it's 'proof' that the 'object' is supernatural.

 

Man, his dad has really fucked him up.

Nope, I was less or more born like that. My dad did nothing, his main interest is astrology and that was much later.
And this is not supernatural. For some people UFO is a perfectly natural thing which has a full right to decorate our atmosphere.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Jacob

Luminon wrote:

Jacob Cordingley wrote:

I haven't read the whole thread, but I'm wondering if anyone picked up on this. In the first photograph the "star" is in front of a hill. Now, maybe this is just me, but celestial objects rarely appear to be in front of objects on Earth. Presumably this is essential for something to even be described as celestial. Now, I don't mean to be rude, but anyone who thinks this to be a star must have some sort of cognitive deficiency.

OK, explaining for the fifth time, the "Star" is not a celestial object, but UFO. I'm curious how many times I'll have to explain it.

Then why call it a star? call something a star when it isn't and well this is what you get. I saw a fluffy kitten in the sky and by fluffy kitten I mean the moon. about the same thing tbh. Still haven't seen it btw

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Tapey wrote:Then why call it

Tapey wrote:

Then why call it a star? call something a star when it isn't and well this is what you get. I saw a fluffy kitten in the sky and by fluffy kitten I mean the moon. about the same thing tbh. Still haven't seen it btw

Again, I say that this object appeared in time of late Christmas, as a repeating of the legend about Star of the East, (or Christmas Star) which announced the birth of baby Jesus. Now it has a similar function, turning people's attention to the planned public appearance of another world teacher, as expected by every major religion. And most obviously by Buddhists, who have his name right.

Btw, I don't know if it's still appearing in the world, I have seen it only once and since then I haven't received much news since then. I've got to wait for the news, if that action was succesful in raising people's and media's attention or not, or if it's still going on.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Tapey

Luminon wrote:

Tapey wrote:

Then why call it a star? call something a star when it isn't and well this is what you get. I saw a fluffy kitten in the sky and by fluffy kitten I mean the moon. about the same thing tbh. Still haven't seen it btw

Again, I say that this object appeared in time of late Christmas, as a repeating of the legend about Star of the East, (or Christmas Star) which announced the birth of baby Jesus. Now it has a similar function, turning people's attention to the planned public appearance of another world teacher, as expected by every major religion. And most obviously by Buddhists, who have his name right.

Btw, I don't know if it's still appearing in the world, I have seen it only once and since then I haven't received much news since then. I've got to wait for the news, if that action was succesful in raising people's and media's attention or not, or if it's still going on.

So Maitreya's sign appeared in late December with a promise of a press conference following a week later where he'd reveal himself.

I don't remember such a press conference. I strongly suspect that it went the way of your ambassador's employment records.

I also suspect that if you met Creme and called him Maitreya, he might well slip and answer to it.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Tapey

Luminon wrote:

Tapey wrote:

Then why call it a star? call something a star when it isn't and well this is what you get. I saw a fluffy kitten in the sky and by fluffy kitten I mean the moon. about the same thing tbh. Still haven't seen it btw

Again, I say that this object appeared in time of late Christmas, as a repeating of the legend about Star of the East, (or Christmas Star) which announced the birth of baby Jesus. Now it has a similar function, turning people's attention to the planned public appearance of another world teacher, as expected by every major religion. And most obviously by Buddhists, who have his name right.

 

... You know that the supposed birth in December was purely an arbitrary designation by the catholic church, right?

 

 

It was designed to ease converts over to their religion from the mass of holidays from other religions at the same time. It has nothing to do with any birth. That was just an excuse. The puritans did not celebrate christmas in fact because of it's pagan origins, and made quite a fuss over people that did. There is not a record of a birth of Jesus, let alone a hint at a time of year.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


crazymonkie
Silver Member
crazymonkie's picture
Posts: 336
Joined: 2009-03-09
User is offlineOffline
And another point: The

And another point: The original time of the holiday was around April/March. Though it's been celebrated as 'the real time of our lord and savior's birth' in EVERY single month during the past 1900 years or so. Even if you take the narrative as true (and that itself is quite a stretch) you still have to deal with the fact that the shepards wouldn't be out at night during winter because the nights in the semi-arid environment of Judea/Galillee are too cold to keep the sheep out.

 

Also: UFOlogy + Christianity + astrology? Why it's a combination we've not seen since the 70s!

OrdinaryClay wrote:
If you don't believe your non-belief then you don't believe and you must not be an atheist.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:So Maitreya's

jcgadfly wrote:

So Maitreya's sign appeared in late December with a promise of a press conference following a week later where he'd reveal himself.

I don't remember such a press conference. I strongly suspect that it went the way of your ambassador's employment records.

I also suspect that if you met Creme and called him Maitreya, he might well slip and answer to it.

The whole purpose of this is, that the Star must have a sufficient media response. Only then there can be the promised press conference. That's logical. There's no point in making the press conference, if the Star wasn't yet noticed by global media. All what Creme does is to create a climate of hope, expectance, and direct invitation, only that allows Maitreya to act. He's bound by our free will and cannot do anything if we don't want it. The people's and media's reaction already allowed him to make some degree of progress in his task, but that's still not enough. He considers the global media as a communicatory organ of the one organism called humanity, and thus the response of media is essential. This is how the free will of humanity won't be infringed. Indifference or lukewarm benevolence is not enough, there must be some kind of active interest in what he has to say.

Furthermore, Creme is not Maitreya. He's a disciple of one of Maitreya's disciples. 


ClockCat wrote:
... You know that the supposed birth in December was purely an arbitrary designation by the catholic church, right?

 It was designed to ease converts over to their religion from the mass of holidays from other religions at the same time. It has nothing to do with any birth. That was just an excuse. The puritans did not celebrate christmas in fact because of it's pagan origins, and made quite a fuss over people that did. There is not a record of a birth of Jesus, let alone a hint at a time of year.

Sure, I know that. But the humanity as such considers it as a special time of the year with certain symbollics. Thus the Masters need to use that symbollics, whether it is historically correct or not. According to them, Jesus was born in the year -24. (thus it has no sense to look for his birth in the year 0 A.D.) But their task is to awake the humanity, not to use a historical timing which otherwise nobody on Earth uses.



crazymonkie wrote:

And another point: The original time of the holiday was around April/March. Though it's been celebrated as 'the real time of our lord and savior's birth' in EVERY single month during the past 1900 years or so. Even if you take the narrative as true (and that itself is quite a stretch) you still have to deal with the fact that the shepards wouldn't be out at night during winter because the nights in the semi-arid environment of Judea/Galillee are too cold to keep the sheep out.

April/March, you say? If I remember, 15th March, year -24, that's the exact date provided by Creme.

 

crazymonkie wrote:
Also: UFOlogy + Christianity + astrology? Why it's a combination we've not seen since the 70s!

Esotericism is a very broad body of knowledge, which underlies all major world's religions, and also contains elements of science and philosophy, but is even more than that. It's an underlying theory for UFO, astrology, ESP, sense of life, and so on, all aspects of life, including life between lives. And what is it all good for? It's a philosophy, or science, of evolution of consciousness. It's very good to develop our consciousness, because everything begins and ends there, what we do or don't do. And specially now, we have so many crises, that we should better start solving them, and collectively.


Skeptics who claim that there is no underlying theory for the methods of alternative medicine and various New Age-like trends, are either crazy, ignorant or lying. (and I specifically mean Sisyfos, the local skeptic's club)

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

So Maitreya's sign appeared in late December with a promise of a press conference following a week later where he'd reveal himself.

I don't remember such a press conference. I strongly suspect that it went the way of your ambassador's employment records.

I also suspect that if you met Creme and called him Maitreya, he might well slip and answer to it.

The whole purpose of this is, that the Star must have a sufficient media response. Only then there can be the promised press conference. That's logical. There's no point in making the press conference, if the Star wasn't yet noticed by global media. All what Creme does is to create a climate of hope, expectance, and direct invitation, only that allows Maitreya to act. He's bound by our free will and cannot do anything if we don't want it. The people's and media's reaction already allowed him to make some degree of progress in his task, but that's still not enough. He considers the global media as a communicatory organ of the one organism called humanity, and thus the response of media is essential. This is how the free will of humanity won't be infringed. Indifference or lukewarm benevolence is not enough, there must be some kind of active interest in what he has to say.

Furthermore, Creme is not Maitreya. He's a disciple of one of Maitreya's disciples. 


ClockCat wrote:
... You know that the supposed birth in December was purely an arbitrary designation by the catholic church, right?

 It was designed to ease converts over to their religion from the mass of holidays from other religions at the same time. It has nothing to do with any birth. That was just an excuse. The puritans did not celebrate christmas in fact because of it's pagan origins, and made quite a fuss over people that did. There is not a record of a birth of Jesus, let alone a hint at a time of year.

Sure, I know that. But the humanity as such considers it as a special time of the year with certain symbollics. Thus the Masters need to use that symbollics, whether it is historically correct or not. According to them, Jesus was born in the year -24. (thus it has no sense to look for his birth in the year 0 A.D.) But their task is to awake the humanity, not to use a historical timing which otherwise nobody on Earth uses.

 


crazymonkie wrote:

And another point: The original time of the holiday was around April/March. Though it's been celebrated as 'the real time of our lord and savior's birth' in EVERY single month during the past 1900 years or so. Even if you take the narrative as true (and that itself is quite a stretch) you still have to deal with the fact that the shepards wouldn't be out at night during winter because the nights in the semi-arid environment of Judea/Galillee are too cold to keep the sheep out.

April/March, you say? If I remember, 15th March, year -24, that's the exact date provided by Creme.

 

crazymonkie wrote:
Also: UFOlogy + Christianity + astrology? Why it's a combination we've not seen since the 70s!

Esotericism is a very broad body of knowledge, which underlies all major world's religions, and also contains elements of science and philosophy, but is even more than that. It's an underlying theory for UFO, astrology, ESP, sense of life, and so on, all aspects of life, including life between lives. And what is it all good for? It's a philosophy, or science, of evolution of consciousness. It's very good to develop our consciousness, because everything begins and ends there, what we do or don't do. And specially now, we have so many crises, that we should better start solving them, and collectively.

 

Skeptics who claim that there is no underlying theory for the methods of alternative medicine and various New Age-like trends, are either crazy, ignorant or lying. (and I specifically mean Sisyfos, the local skeptic's club)

 

Don't hurt yourself backpedaling.

 

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Interesting thread.So, how

Interesting thread.

So, how do you know these are all the same star? Also, how do you know it's an UFO and not Venus, Polaris, an airplane, etc.

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Don't hurt

jcgadfly wrote:

Don't hurt yourself backpedaling.

I'm not backpedaling, this is Creme's official explanation for why the Star kept appearing for several months around the world, which maybe still continues. And it gives a sense. But if the media will fail to notice that event, we'll probably have to wait for a total worldwide stock market crash, that is the most safe bet for Maitreya's appearance I know of.


 

butterbattle wrote:

Interesting thread.

So, how do you know these are all the same star? Also, how do you know it's an UFO and not Venus, Polaris, an airplane, etc.

Besides the fact that it was predicted... it's the only UFO on our skies which could be seen regularly and easily. All other have usually a different tasks in our atmosphere, than to just show themselves around.
Yes, it is usual that people mistakes planets for UFO, but it requires only a basic knowledge of our sky to see the difference. Usually, the greatest difference is, that the Star shines more brightly than almost anything else, in multiple colors, and it flickers, even if no star or planet does that at all. It also doesn't move, while airplanes must move, otherwise they'd fall down. It may appear and disappear at will, while celestial bodies doesn't do that. It is simply looking unusual enough to catch people's attention. They often dismiss it as a too bright Venus or Jupiter, but sometimes they know enough about the sky to know that this is something which shouldn't be there.
And finally, in some cases, the Star was visible during the day.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:jcgadfly

Luminon wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Don't hurt yourself backpedaling.

I'm not backpedaling, this is Creme's official explanation for why the Star kept appearing for several months around the world, which maybe still continues. And it gives a sense. But if the media will fail to notice that event, we'll probably have to wait for a total worldwide stock market crash, that is the most safe bet for Maitreya's appearance I know of.

 

 

butterbattle wrote:

Interesting thread.

So, how do you know these are all the same star? Also, how do you know it's an UFO and not Venus, Polaris, an airplane, etc.

Besides the fact that it was predicted... it's the only UFO on our skies which could be seen regularly and easily. All other have usually a different tasks in our atmosphere, than to just show themselves around.
Yes, it is usual that people mistakes planets for UFO, but it requires only a basic knowledge of our sky to see the difference. Usually, the greatest difference is, that the Star shines more brightly than almost anything else, in multiple colors, and it flickers, even if no star or planet does that at all. It also doesn't move, while airplanes must move, otherwise they'd fall down. It may appear and disappear at will, while celestial bodies doesn't do that. It is simply looking unusual enough to catch people's attention. They often dismiss it as a too bright Venus or Jupiter, but sometimes they know enough about the sky to know that this is something which shouldn't be there.
And finally, in some cases, the Star was visible during the day.

Ah, you're relaying Creme's backpedaling. I see.

The pictures that you showed have Maitreya only overshadowing Creme - was he the only one of Maitreya's disciples at those gatherings? It just seems strange that Maitreya would choose to only overshadow Creme (or take on his appearance with dark hair, etc).

Occam's razor again. Creme changing his hair color or a jiggling camera is more plausible than a returning magic being/alien.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin