New RFC standard issued by the IETF. "Darwinist" tag in IP header

bpwaddell
bpwaddell's picture
Posts: 46
Joined: 2009-10-29
User is offlineOffline
New RFC standard issued by the IETF. "Darwinist" tag in IP header

 

Darwinists Launch Cyber Attack Against Intelligent Design Website.

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2009/10/darwinists_launch_cyber_attack.html

The Discovery Institute were able to identify the attackers as Darwinists.

Apparently, the IETF have introduced a new flag into the IP protocol, which now  tags the IP header as "Darwinist" ,
however,  after contacting the IETF they have denied such a revision has been implemented.


Therefore,  I can only conclude that the Discovery Institute has discovered yet another way of
interpreting the world around it , which now extends to  a new way of decoding the IP Header .
I wonder if they will share this with rest of world so we can understand how they did it !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Just more evidence that the

Just more evidence that the 'Discovery' Institute has yet to discover the real world, and has invented its own...

 

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13254
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
Rofl. You'd think a think

Rofl. You'd think a think tank would think of protecting their servers from such an attack, and go further by backing up their info. I'd say this proves they don't 'think' at all.

Edit: I guess they did back it up. But they don't know how ddos attacks tend to work. It's usually someone with a botnet, as rarely if ever can you organise enough people to pull one off without it. It therefore stands to reason that 90% or so of the participants didn't even know they were participating, yet the institute can still claim who did it? LOL

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.