|
Navigation
The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us. Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple
|
Guys, we have a problem.
Posted on: April 26, 2010 - 3:22am
   Offline
Guys, we have a problem.
I offer for your review these two things: 6.9 magnitude earthquake shakes Taiwan
We need double-blind studies NOW! (Well, maybe not double-blind. A little peeking, you know...) Religion is a virus.
|
|
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2024.
|
Yes, I agree. For the sake of science and humanity, we need to conduct some research into this correlation to prevent potential disasters in the future. A sample of approximately 5000 females should be enough for our purposes.
I volunteer to collect "data" for this experiment.
Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare
Well, I'm convinced. It's clearly true.
There are literally hundreds of earthquakes every single day. Several per day are at least in the magnitude 6 spectrum. Perhaps the most telling thing about boobquake is that absolutely nothing out of the ordinary did happen ...
BigUniverse wrote,
"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."
No, you've got it all wrong, that *proves* that they are caused by slutty women and their filthy girl parts.
Just wait, almighty Allah will have his revenge on the western devil harlots of Satan.
Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.
Nevertheless, we need an organized review of the amount of indecency on the internet. Volunteers to collect data can apply for only $5.
Religion is a virus.
Fight the infection.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
I think I have found the problem.... http://www.chelseacharms.com/
www.RichWoodsBlog.com
Wow, I feel I accomplished something by wearing my deep v-necked shirt on Monday. It worked!
Slowly building a blog at ~
http://obsidianwords.wordpress.com/
Rich... if I wanted to date a plastic, disfigured woman I'd BUY A MANNEQUIN!!!
(or maybe a realdoll? haha..
)
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
She's actually a friend of mine and my wife's... Very sweet...VERY smart... But yeah, Her proportions are a *tad* over the top....
www.RichWoodsBlog.com
And here I was thinking she was just the female version of Ron Jeremy.
Ah, well... point taken, my friend. I take most of what I said back.
I guess I take issue with girls who think they need to undergo surgery before feeling attractive and finally accepting their physique for what it is.
In my view of sexual dynamics, some women really need to accept that they are attractive just the way they are, WITHOUT any ridiculous cosmetic enhancement, and REGARDLESS of how many shitty boyfriends cheat on them, dump them, abuse them, etc.
Brian37 appears to take a similar stance towards feminine beauty.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
We're getting sidetracked... this isn't about any of our perceptions of beauty... This is about an Iranian cleric blaming cleavage for earthquakes... and me, being the fact finding, science first, research journalist that I am.... finding a set of mamalian protrubernces that would support that theory...
The key word being "support"...
www.RichWoodsBlog.com
... guess because "fortune favors the foolish" or somesuch. Oh yeah!
Whew, ahhhh.... damn! NEW (suggested) RULE FOR RRS! Anyone found to be getting in the way of 'lols' is hereby pronounced... guilty!!
and stuff.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
We do NOT need new rules at the RRS. We need a thourough investigation of the double D question. A deep hands-on investigation into why female bras carry so much realy good bouncing things while men don't. Me and my hands are ready to serve the RRS in anyway we can. Even if it takes like forever.
"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."
VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"
If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?
Yeah. But maybe we needs a sarcasm smiley!
(hint:I was trying to make a little funny while damn near suffocating over Rich's post with my head hurting from laughing so damn hard.
)
Also, you wants investigation, make a stop in San Fran. Apparently there's "walking nudists" aplenty there.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)