My inbox (1)
So I got a PM, and yet I can't read it. Everytime I click on it it says access denied.
I know the PMs were disabled for non-subscribers/superfans and all, but why not have read only for non-subscribers/superfans?
As to whoever sent me the message, I enabled the personal contact form to get in contact so you can re-send it there.
Or don't bother if you were just trying to get me on a date.
- Login to post comments
I have one message in my inbox also. I can not access it. Are PM's disabled or something?
i know that i can recieve and read the crap that makes its way into my inbox... never actually tried sending anything, i guess ill try spamming pineapple to see if it works.
Edit; Spam is presently making its way through the intertubes... it appears i have full access to private messages >.>
What Would Kharn Do?
Yes, you have to either be a subscriber or have a badge such as "superfan" or "atheist"
I think it worked considering that I have two messages that I can't read now.
Because you have an atheist badge.
[bullshit=Kapkao]Uhhh... YEAH, it was me... sending one of my creepy-pervy-stalker invitations to a ... rimjob that... I no longer have use for.[/bullshit] I discovered on FB that there's only one real girl for me anyhow.
Good Lord Sapient, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, and free atheist badges for everyone in here.
(Except Doomkitty... she's been too naughty as of late! )
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
I believe that's my message I sent you months ago, telling you I wasn't a fan of Noam Chomsky in addition to not liking globalism.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
What about Noam Chomsky don't you like? Is it just his VERY leftest leanings, or is it something else? Just curious...
"This may shock you, but not everything in the bible is true." The only true statement ever to be uttered by Jean Chauvinism, sociopathic emotional terrorist.
"A Boss in Heaven is the best excuse for a boss on earth, therefore If God did exist, he would have to be abolished." Mikhail Bakunin
"The means in which you take,
dictate the ends in which you find yourself."
"Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme leadership derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
No Gods, No Masters!
Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.
I have had the same thing for some time now. I subscribed and my status never went up either.
It's not that I don't like him; it's that I'm just not a fan of his political leanings. 'Polpot wasn't necessarily a genocidal asshole'? Holocaust deniers aren't antisemitic? If he says...
At the same time, I can dislike everything that comes out of the guy's mouth, while still appreciate the general principle for why he expresses the... UNIQUE viewpoints that he does: get people to question their established history and look at nationalistic American propaganda in a critical manner.
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)