froodley but after a few seconds consideration I realised you were probably right in some ways. In any case, if there was no secular resistance you'd not be able to spend all your time batting off over pinkworld.com. Instead you'd be living in a mud hut waiting for the carrier pigeons to arrive and praying the lord would miracle away the gangrene eating your legs.

Is it "childish" to know that the earth is a globe and not flat? Is it "childish" to tell women they don't have to dress up in tents because insecure men demand that they do? Is it "childish" to tell people that it takes two sets of DNA to make a baby?

You falsely equate the blasphemy that goes on here as the ignorant zealotry of the likes of Bin Ladin and right wingers like Pat Robertson. None of us here advocate violence. None of us here advocate a fascist state. None of us here want people arrested merely for believing things we find absurd.

"Childish" to me is setting up taboos because you don't want your beliefs challenged. Humans never would have left the caves if we always accepted social norms an popular belief.

There is no such thing as an invisible magical super brain with no brain, no neurons, no cerebellum, no material, no location. Humans, past and present, have always made gods up and they are merely a reflection of human desires. I see nothing "childish" about telling someone that Santa isn't real.

I think you might want to stay of the shrooms yourself.

Dude, you are aware that god gave rock and roll to you, right? I place my faith in a loud guitar.
 

STATION!!!!

Which doesn't prove there is, so now I win. Yay ! Such fun ! Okay, your turn again.

I love this game. Everyone's a winner.

Have a lollipop.

For God's sake why someone might need to prove there is no god(s)?  Who cares? 

lol do MORE no offense

If you're going to bring bill and ted into it, I have nothing.

You're an agnostic ? Okay, then me and that theist over there are gonna beat you up and split your money between us.

You're an agnostic what? Agnosticism isn't a position. 

Oh and my middle aged crazy can likely whip your red belt.

Let me rephrase - it's a position of knowledge and says nothing of belief. Most here refer to themselves as agnostic atheists. I'm kind of in between agnostic atheist and agnostic deist.

So, we know what you don't know. What do you believe?

Oh, lest we forget, you're the one who brought up his belt in TKD. If you'd actually studied the art, would you brag?

I tried to ignore this post in hopes that it would just go away, but you just keep posting these incoherent ramblings.

First off your agnostic which leads me to believe that you want religion, but none will have you.

Secondly, by you writing I can tell that you are young, or just “childish”

So here we go.

The way I see it is that you come home found your mom in bed with your brother. Seeing as you have had a longstanding sexual relationship with both, you felt double betrayed. You took this to your pastor (Baptist) only to find him with your father. This led you to repeal both your family and your religion. Neither will have you now “your damaged goods”. So you argued this out with the family, and seems you won that argument. So then it hit you, “if I can win this argument then I can win them all”.

So you fired up the old computer and googled “Rational people”, thus her you are.

Now being a rational minded person I will tell you go get help!!!

Someone out there has had the same things happen to them. That is what you need to be doing with your spare time

http://www.rationalresponders.com/am_i_agnostic_or_atheist

It's an epistemological position, but it says nothing about your belief.  For someone willing to admit they don't know something, you're sure making yourself look like an asshat as you assert something you don't really know about (the definition of atheism).

Btw... I read your scholarly article aboutyour definition of atheism. But you know what? Everyone else in the worlds defines atheism as disbelief in God and agnosticism as not knowing. So if you want to sit around and yank it and tell me that in your world a hat is a four-legged animal that says meow, you have fun with that. No offense.

Honestly?  I believe that's not germaine to the current conversation, so I won't be telling you.

Ah, that was just a joke bc you said something or other about me getting beaten up by an atheist and a theist.  I doubt I could beat up anyone over the age of 8.

 Pothead I may be but I don't have anything to be paranoid about nor am I uptight cuz I share. Like I said it helps to rationalize thoughs and from what I see from all the comments you have made you apparently have some issues. You want to come on here and vent some anger you apparently have because you think you have everything figured out and you're bored because no one else will listen to you. whaaaa! That being said I hope you enjoy your time here and I hope it helps you to vent.

It's not an ad hom if you actually are an idiot and your arguments are addressed.  In this case I will note that you are an idiot and that you restated my own argument... however you confused me with the rest of the world.  MOST of the world understands atheism is disbelief in god, but MANY Americans do not.  Disbelief in god is the position of all babies, myself, and all agnostics who don't have a positive belief in a god (probably you) making you an atheist.  What's worse of course is you just argued my position without any fucking clue you did so, proving you can't grasp understanding of what "disbelieve" means.

As for your getting laid comment... ah fuck... everyone else here already knows.

And hey, frack isn't a word either. I think he meant fuck?

 I see you guys are skeptics.  I happen to think this guy is a brand new asshat.  I didn't bother to check an ip or anything, he's not worth the effort.

lmao

Yeah.  Just forget the whole thing.  You think you're freethinkers; I find your world small.

It's not easy to stand up to a room full of people and tell them you think their point of view is flawed.  I'm not saying I was being really pleasant or anything, which was sort of a strategy, but if you're going to resort to calling me an idiot, I don't want to bother with you.  I was trying to have a spirited debate, but apparently you're looking to have an atheist clique.

And this silliness about what the word means... just use the words like everyone else does.  Have you ever met some guy who wanted to go on and on and on about the Illuminati or something like that?  Some conspiracy nut who thinks he's got something interesting to say, but it's all just his own obsessed little world that... you know, he might be right, but it's still just kind of sad?  Do you want to be that guy?  The guy who goes on and on about how the word atheism actually means agnosticism and everyone who uses the words to describe two different things, which is literally almost everyone except you, is in fact a complete and utter moron?  Not just wrong, which is debatable at the very least, but literally a person of low, low intelligence?

Bye.

You have pathetic grammar.  I wonder what that says about the way your mind works and how logical you actually are capable of being.  I wonder what it says about your ability to learn, since I know you were taught grammar.  I wonder what your inability to retain very basic information about the English language says about your theory about the meaning of these words.  It's sort of hilarious to be called an idiot in such a grammatically pathetic paragraph.  Anyway.

You're still here?  You are not only a stupid hypocrite, but you are a liar with no spine as well.  How pathetic.

P.S. I only read your first sentence, you're dead to me.

Yeah I know, I took care of that for you.

What do the participants of this thread think?  Would you delete it?  My inclination is to leave it.