AND this dip shit is taking this power shift as "we don't like the dems". FAILING to mention that they were booted out of office the past two election cycles themselves.

HEY DIPSHIT! It is not that they love you any more, they are just kicking out the trash until both parties get the message.

Now that you have the keys to the car back, do not think for one instance that the same old shit will work.

I am pissed of at the Dems for being pussies and they deserve to lose the keys to the car. And I am for smaller government.

You've heard the saying,

"A chain is only as strong as the weakest link"

Smaller government will only work when those who have realize that they cannot abandon the other two classes.

Corporate anarchy put our economy into the ditch. "fuck the poor and middle class" "every man for themselves" is as bad as what this same class RIGHTFULLY accuses North Korea of.

The only difference between China's wealth and America's wealth is that a CLASS controls our government and a political party controls China's. BUT BOTH ARE A MONOPOLY OF POWER.

If Bonhead doesn't want me to condemn him for being rich, then he shouldn't call any job "crappy" and treat those at the bottom like pieces of shit.

Actually I am lucky enough to have a job that cannot be outsourced, but the place I work could easily  go under if the economy got bad enough. I am lucky to work in a well established business. The boss seems to think it is the menu, and although it is good, the workers are what make it. I have had tons of jobs and I can tell you, if your workers don't give a shit no matter how good your product is, it will suffer.

Here is my prediction of the future. IF both parties continue to be bought, we might climb out of this bubble, for now, but we will build a bigger bubble in the future that will be worse.

My problem will never be what someone wants in life. My problem has always been exploitation and people projecting themselves on others making life out to be a script, rather than valuing the contribution an individual makes, no matter how small it may be.

I am happy for someone if they want to live in a mansion or own a business. But if someone is happy with less it should not be a death sentence nor should they be condemned for wanting less. They are still doing something productive that those above them don't want to do themselves.

I am just sick of people like this thinking happiness is all about title and status and consuming just because you can. My friends don't love me for what I have, my friends love me because of who I am. Being rich doesn't make one moral anymore than being poor means you are the only class capable of compassion.

We really are all in this together and one size does not fit all.

I think Boner boy and his Republican allies are total hypocritical douches.  Having said that, it still comes down to the idiots that keep forgetting and voting asshats like him into office.  I beat my head against the wall trying to convince my Republican friends/family to the idiocy that is voting for these clowns.  Facts mean nothing to them.  Boehner and his kind keep saying what their voters want to hear.  That's all that matters to them.  Wave the flag, chant "We're #1", threaten to kick some small backwards countries ass and you've got their vote for sure...

Whether it's religion or these republican hemorrhoids, hopefully evolution will weed them out.  If we as a society make it that long...

 I read somewhere that moderates are falling by the wayside. Someone should find this wayside and give them a fukin lift.

OK, I may be a bit prejudiced in my opinion.  I see the extreme crazies on the right.  Could you give me an example of the lefts crazies, that have any actual effect and not just something that you see on FAUX (like the new Black Panther Party)?

Greenpeace aren't left crazies- their social and political views vary.  These days they're mostly just "we're afraid of science" crazies.

It's hard to nail down leftist crazy because it's difficult to demonstrate to people. 

Typically it involves the flawed view that taxing the upper class and throwing money into ill conceived social programs for the lower class will fix everything.  More or less, it boils down to:  more tax -> more government programs -> more duct tape to attempt to address symptoms of a more fundamental problem.

Which side is stupider?  Well, the Republicans are slightly more idiotic- not that the Democrats are doing the right thing. 

For the Democrats, theoretically speaking, you *can* keep expanding government programs and taxation until you fix everything- you also have to micromanage the economy.  Going in that direction is like whack-a-mole; you create more problems as you solve old ones, and by the time you're done the government is a huge bureaucratic mess with profound influence over the minutiae of human life.  They know this on some level, and while most people who realize this don't like it, it can sort of work (however unpleasant it may be for the middle and upper class).

For the Republicans, they have their heads too far up their asses pandering to right wing social conservatism to address the actual issues, and they spend too much time beholden to corporate interests to actually administer the fixes they prescribe- they're coming and going, and tripping over themselves in the process.  You can't trim government without simultaneously removing some of the unorthodox protections that corporate lobbying has instilled into government.

Republicans are more idiotic in the sense that, taken as a whole, they're trying to do something self contradictory to the reasoning they're following. Democrats just have a very elaborate and bizarre vision.

To use a bad metaphor, Republicans want to have their cakes and eat them too- Democrats just want a really big cake.

It makes it easier to point out the right wing idiocy, as contradiction is idiocy from any standpoint, and because the left wing crazies aren't so much crazy as possessing very special views on how society should work.

Then you have the libertarians, which is what the Republics should be if they were more consistent, but who will never get any foothold because they don't pander as well to the source of the money- which directly translates into votes through campaign financing.

I don't necessarily have a strong opinion on the matter- I don't like to weigh in on political opinions.

Bleh, I hate talking politics.  It's easier to debate religion.

While the Wingnut Right has more psychopaths than the Wingnut Left... it's not like the Liberals don't have people on their side who are the equivelant of Beck, Palin, and the rest of the factually challenged imbeciles who spew hate as their revenue generating product....

Ed Shultz?... Van Jones?.... Al Sharpton?.... Nancy Pelosi????......... Ignominious fucktards, all of them....

Just off the top of my head;

Amnesty International, PETA, MECCHA, and of course Greenpeace.

What I would consider crazy (right or left), would be those that bring guns to intimidate others.  Those that call for "2nd Amendment" solutions if they don't get their way in an election.  Those that single out and demonize their opposition, minorities, the "other" that isn't like themselves, the violence in the form of threats, breakins, toxins sent in the mail.   Those, that when faced with the facts, still blindly follow the leaders of their party/position/media god(s) etc...

I don't see much, if any, of that on the left.

The reason he had all the crappy jobs, is because he's a piece of shit.  <rimshot>