The 'Rational' Fundy Formula for Debate
Offline !. Come up with a word or series of words to describe what it is that you don't understand but wish to 'disprove'.
2. Take rarely used words from philosophy or any other subject that sounds good such as non-paraconsistent logic, phenomenological reduction, Epistemology, Suburethral Calculi, absurdist progressive gradualism.
3. Insert these words into mind numbingly long tirades.
4. Insist that any refutation of your gibberish is an ad hominem attack. Ad hominem makes you sound uber cool and intelligent!
5. Declare victory in an insulting and condescending manner.
6. Copy & paste the next installment.
The end result looks something like this.
A Logical Discombobulation of Atheistic Absurdist Progressive Gradualism
Atheists are inherently absurdist progressive gradualists, as demonstrated by Urey & Geller in their atheist soup mixture which failed to replicate God's creation event. Lacking the enticement of God's Luddite Rapidism, they flounder on the banks of epistemological failure and sexual paraphilia. I shall now demonstrate this using Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's model of phenomenological reduction.
While absurdist progressive gradulists are attempting to prefabricate the protozoan dichotomy of their lexicon, they lavishly reveal the Suburethral Calculi of their dilemma. Grimacing in the externalist bigotry of their self effacing narcisim, their true nature is thus revealed. This non-paraconsistent logic reticulates impulsively in the very heart of their argument, thereby proving a) Orville Redenbacher's theory of Goddidit, b) that atheistic absurdist progressive gradualism is ineffectual and inconsistent with logic, and c) that atheistic absurdist progressive gradualists do indeed consume babies....
Author's Note: Continue on in this manner for a minimum of 58 paragraphs before ending with the word Respectfully.
It takes a village to raise an idiot.
Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.
Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.
- Login to post comments
ROFLMAO
I think I described a pattern too, once-- something like this:
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.”
I don't claim to be anything other than a true ignoramus when it comes to philosophy. Does "suburethral calculi" have anything to do with bladder control?
-- I feel so much better since I stopped trying to believe.
"We are entitled to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Al Franken
"If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointed" - Ruth M.
ANSWERS !!!
ANSWERS :
Des :
It is a logical fallacy to admit to a logical fallacy. Since you believe in nothing, it is a logical fallacy to say that you believe in something. The logical fallacy can not exist if the person can not formulate logic to begin with, another thread can start this up. Empricism can have no known sequence of logical fallacy since all is a logical fallacy.
Ubuntu :
Patterns can only be described by the infinite reference point. Without an infinite reference point, the reference point becomes non-existent and therefore empiricism can not create the reference point.
CJ:
The Bible speaks very plainly on bladder control. But since all that Atheists have is empircism, we can not logically ascertain that bladders exist to those that do not believe in them.
Harleysportster :
Humor and sarcasm are logical fallacies. You have no infinite reference point, therefore it is illogical to reference humor from non-existence.
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
-- I feel so much better since I stopped trying to believe.
"We are entitled to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Al Franken
"If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointed" - Ruth M.
<chuckles> Kidney stones below the urethra. I never said the words had to make sense in the context they were being used. They just need to sound impressive.
It takes a village to raise an idiot.
Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.
Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.
Calculi = calcium - got it. I'll bet you would sound impressive if you were passing one. I thought my chain was being pulled. I just couldn't figure out from which direction.
-- I feel so much better since I stopped trying to believe.
"We are entitled to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Al Franken
"If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointed" - Ruth M.
Hello everyone. New member here. It may be awhile before I start posting. It takes TIME to read all of this and compose THE ANSWERS!!!!
..................and tell us about yourself. All...... and I say ALL!!! are welcome here. We have no censorship, unless you make death threats, so speak up and make a post. We all want to hear from newbies.
"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."
VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"
If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?
Thanks for that, Des.
LOL.
Someone has undoubtedly come across the threads of Jean Chauvin and his formulas for mass replying.
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
I consider your refutation of my meaningless argument an Ad hominem attack based on the fact that Ad hominem sounds uber cool. Also the fact that I didn't even present a meaningless argument and that you didn't object to it makes it even more confusing.
Welcome to the forum, post a message in Introductions.
"Don't seek these laws to understand. Only the mad can comprehend..." -- George Cosbuc
Heh, I missed this thread. Awesome OP, I lol'ed.
Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.
Brilliant post. You are, I believe, referring to what we used to call "double talk."
My favorite part is "and end with the word respectfully". So true. I've lost count of how many people call you names, insult you at every turn, get nasty and hateful, condemn you to hellfire, then sign, "Respectfully".
If you want to tell someone to fuck off and die in a fire, just do it, God knows what you mean anyway.
Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.