Chi, what do guys make of this.

NoMoreCrazyPeople
atheistSuperfan
NoMoreCrazyPeople's picture
Posts: 969
Joined: 2009-10-14
User is offlineOffline

Sandycane
atheist
Sandycane's picture
Posts: 970
Joined: 2010-10-16
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:...OK, I got a

Luminon wrote:

...

OK, I got a bit sarcastic here, but did it ever occur to anyone that things like chi energy or life itself might depend on dark matter around us? Scientists explored so much of the material universe, so that they now stumbled upon the less material part of it. If there is any interaction between it and our matter, then life would surely make use of it during the course of evolution. Notice, that there are many concepts like chi or prana, and this vital energy is absorbed from surroundings in ways like concentrated breathing, it's not primarily generated by the body itself. It is processed in several main centers along the line of spine (near major endocrine glands) and distributed around by channels. No wonder that this stuff is elusive, just like dark matter is. But it is not supernatural... only that the concepts of the supernatural itself were built on its basis.

Wow, what a coinky-dink! You must have been typing this the same moment I was thinking the same thing while reading this:

Concept of Qi Qi was originally a philosophic concept. The ancients believed that the world changes and things in the world can transform from one to another, so when they tried to explain the world with a common substance, they determined that the substance must have two properties: invisibility and motion. As it is invisible or has no certain shape, it can create various kinds of things; and as it is moving, things in the world are always changing and may transform from one to another. Air, the original meaning of Qi, is just such a substance which cannot be seen but the movement of which, as wind, can be felt. This was extended to mean that the most basic substance of the world, and its movement and change can explain the generation, development and change of all things in the world

 

'Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.' A. Einstein


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Sandycane wrote:BobSpence1

Sandycane wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Chi is not energy, certainly not in the sense in which electricity is a flow of energy. It is a more metaphorical usage of the term.

It appears to be a mind technique for focussing your effort for maximal peak impact, or for other actions which involve similar coordination of physical action.

 

Ummm, no.

Everything you ever or never wanted to know about Chi (Qi)

You can take it or leave it but, you can't redefine it.

No but you can reify the heck out of it.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Sandycane
atheist
Sandycane's picture
Posts: 970
Joined: 2010-10-16
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:No but you

jcgadfly wrote:

No but you can reify the heck out of it.

You can but, Chi is not an abstraction - it's very real especially to those who cultivate it.

(Sounds a bit like a theology debate, doesn't it?)

'Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.' A. Einstein


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
 luminon wrote:Let's have a

 

luminon wrote:
Let's have a bit of zen philosophy

 

Let's have a bit of Irish philosophy. Take a plane to JFK and a train to Stamford. I will show you chi. I will take you out for a bunch of beers right after.

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Sandycane wrote:BobSpence1

Sandycane wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Chi is not energy, certainly not in the sense in which electricity is a flow of energy. It is a more metaphorical usage of the term.

It appears to be a mind technique for focussing your effort for maximal peak impact, or for other actions which involve similar coordination of physical action. 

Ummm, no.

Everything you ever or never wanted to know about Chi (Qi)

You can take it or leave it but, you can't redefine it.

I am not 'redefining it', I am assessing what it can only be in reality, regardless of what the believers mean by the term.

I will never deny what it feels like to you, what mental states you associate with Chi, that it feels like you have access to some extra form of energy.

But I must point out that that no more indicates that there actually is some normally hidden source of energy in the body than a Theist's claims of having experienced a communion with God proves God exists.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Let's have a

Luminon wrote:

Let's have a bit of zen philosophy. If a tree falls in the forest but nobody is there to hear it, does it still make a sound?

Yes.

Luminon wrote:
If some people are aware of their chi energy but no scientist is there to measure them or he didn't yet figure out how to, are they still aware of their chi energy?

Yes, of course, but then you're just begging the question i.e. assuming that chi energy exists.

If you don't have evidence, then the belief is unjustified. That is all. If they can't demonstrate their "awareness," then anyone who is "unaware" has just as much reason to believe them as they do for any pseudoscience - none.

Luminon wrote:
The rational skeptical lot is usually not fond of dualists, but you seem like one.

I am not.

Luminon wrote:
Things are either black or white,

There are other colors.

Luminon wrote:
natural or supernatural, knowable and observable or absolutely unknowable and unseen.

Those are both definitively dichotomies.

Luminon wrote:
If there would be any truth in chi energy, scientists would already know all about it,

No, that is not what I'm saying. Strawman.

Regardless of whether there is any truth in it or whether we can know about it, the fact is we don't know about it right now. Ergo, it is simply an unjustified claim, and it is irrational to believe it.

Luminon wrote:
OK, I got a bit sarcastic here, but did it ever occur to anyone that things like chi energy or life itself might depend on dark matter around us? Scientists explored so much of the material universe, so that they now stumbled upon the less material part of it. If there is any interaction between it and our matter, then life would surely make use of it during the course of evolution.

If you don't have evidence, then you're just speculating.

Luminon wrote:
Notice, that there are many concepts like chi or prana, and this vital energy is absorbed from surroundings in ways like concentrated breathing, it's not primarily generated by the body itself. It is processed in several main centers along the line of spine (near major endocrine glands) and distributed around by channels. No wonder that this stuff is elusive, just like dark matter is. But it is not supernatural... only that the concepts of the supernatural itself were built on its basis.

I have no idea what you're talking about. 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Blake
atheistScience Freak
Posts: 991
Joined: 2010-02-19
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Sandycane

BobSpence1 wrote:

Sandycane wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Chi is not energy, certainly not in the sense in which electricity is a flow of energy. It is a more metaphorical usage of the term.

It appears to be a mind technique for focussing your effort for maximal peak impact, or for other actions which involve similar coordination of physical action. 

Ummm, no.

Everything you ever or never wanted to know about Chi (Qi)

You can take it or leave it but, you can't redefine it.

I am not 'redefining it', I am assessing what it can only be in reality, regardless of what the believers mean by the term.

 

Right, it's like saying "'god' is a meme common among those uneducated in the sciences, used commonly to rationalize arbitrary systems of moral absolutism, and to resolve their fears of death with imagined immortality" - no matter what *believers* think it is, that's what it actually is.

'Chi' is a meme, associated with certain uses- whatever it is believed to be is irrelevant.  That's not a redefinition, it's just a description of the reality.  As per the woo definition, chi simply doesn't exist; that doesn't mean we can't reference the meme for what *it* is, though.


iwbiek
atheistSuperfan
iwbiek's picture
Posts: 4298
Joined: 2008-03-23
User is offlineOffline
Answers in Gene Simmons

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

 

luminon wrote:
Let's have a bit of zen philosophy

 

Let's have a bit of Irish philosophy. Take a plane to JFK and a train to Stamford. I will show you chi. I will take you out for a bunch of beers right after.

i'm in.  well, for the beer anyway.  i don't give a fuck about chi.

(in fact, to show how little i even think of it, i at first thought nmcp made this thread about something happening in chicago.)

"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
butterbattle wrote:Yes, of

butterbattle wrote:

Yes, of course, but then you're just begging the question i.e. assuming that chi energy exists.

If you don't have evidence, then the belief is unjustified. That is all. If they can't demonstrate their "awareness," then anyone who is "unaware" has just as much reason to believe them as they do for any pseudoscience - none.

I observe the chi energy with my senses, so I assume it exists. But it doesn't matter if I do. I also assume that those people are aware of it. It is of course a terribly diffcult thing to demonstrate without technology.
I suggest - take one person with awareness of chi energy - like me, scan his brain activity, specially the one related to tactile perception or anything unusual, and compare it to brain activity of a person with no feeling of chi, etheric body or anything like that. Ask the person A to do a few tricks with the chi - stimulate it, concentrate it in some center, shift it around the body and so on. (just say it, they should know what to do) Then scan him and compare it to the records of a person B doing nothing.

I'd gladly volunteer for such an experiment if it would be scheduled for some days off and expenses would be covered.

butterbattle wrote:
No, that is not what I'm saying. Strawman.

Regardless of whether there is any truth in it or whether we can know about it, the fact is we don't know about it right now. Ergo, it is simply an unjustified claim, and it is irrational to believe it.

Yes, it's a strawman, but it still seems to me like you overrate your position. Consider how much time modern scientists devoted to the study of chi, and how much time the ancient sources did. China, India, Japan, even modern Theosophists, their sources describe the workings of chi into great detail. They of course didn't analyze what it is, only wrote down how it behaves. Anyone of common intelligence could take worldwide sources and their writings and synthetize from them the most probable model or several models of chi mechanisms in human body. That should be enough data to begin the research. Hell, even the aureola around Christian icons of saints is quite meaningful in this context. Heart chakra and crown chakra are typically highlighted on these icons.
The problem is, that scientists always want evidence first, unless someone funded their research in advance.

butterbattle wrote:
If you don't have evidence, then you're just speculating.
Yes, I'm speculating most of the time, unless I speak from my own experience. Hell, why not just say I'm hypothesizing? Something of what I say should be even testable, see above.

butterbattle wrote:
I have no idea what you're talking about. 
And you're not interested to learn about it unless you get evidence in advance. That is understandable, it's just... not helpful, you see? What if proving the truth needs some research in advance to produce the evidence needed for research? Well, then all the scientific glory is left up to coincidence, if the evidence ever shows up or not.

BobSpence1 wrote:
I am not 'redefining it', I am assessing what it can only be in reality, regardless of what the believers mean by the term.

I will never deny what it feels like to you, what mental states you associate with Chi, that it feels like you have access to some extra form of energy.

But I must point out that that no more indicates that there actually is some normally hidden source of energy in the body than a Theist's claims of having experienced a communion with God proves God exists.

Well, finally a reasonable non-dualistic talk. There is one reality and it's only a question what things are parts of it.

But tell me, why do you think that chi is associated with states of consciousness, like believers' communion with God? In my life experience, chi is there and works regardless of the mental state. This is why I think that chi is much more plausible than God.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Lum, Chi is a label like

Lum,

Chi is a label like Buddhism is. Sam Harris as an irrational affinity to Buddhism and he is a smart guy too. Not knowing how someone does something doe not mean the label is magically the cause, it merely means the person  doing it is not giving out their secret.

Training is what is going on in this. Just like a stunt man cant merely jump off a tall building. Just like an NFL kicker has to train for bad weather and long kicks. Just like even in the ACTING called the WWE the actors are well trained physically.

Humans have a range of physical ability and tolerance, and some can be trained or study and do things others cannot do physically. Not knowing how something is done does not constitute a stupid label being the cause. It merely means YOU don't know the natural reason, be it faked and a trick, or merely a matter of the type of training. Either way, there is no magic to life.

All superstitions are the result of intellectual laziness and merely the fantasy people stick in as a gap answer where answers may lack. There may be things about life we don't know, that is true, but there is no such thing as magic. Never was and never will be.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:Lum,Chi is a

Brian37 wrote:

Lum,

Chi is a label like Buddhism is. Sam Harris as an irrational affinity to Buddhism and he is a smart guy too. Not knowing how someone does something does not mean the label is magically the cause, it merely means the person  doing it is not giving out their secret.

Training is what is going on in this. Just like a stunt man cant merely jump off a tall building. Just like an NFL kicker has to train for bad weather and long kicks. Just like even in the ACTING called the WWE the actors are well trained physically.

Humans have a range of physical ability and tolerance, and some can be trained or study and do things others cannot do physically. Not knowing how something is done does not constitute a stupid label being the cause. It merely means YOU don't know the natural reason, be it faked and a trick, or merely a matter of the type of training. Either way, there is no magic to life.

All superstitions are the result of intellectual laziness and merely the fantasy people stick in as a gap answer where answers may lack. There may be things about life we don't know, that is true, but there is no such thing as magic. Never was and never will be.

Brian, what you wrote can be interpreted both ways, very ambiguously. So it is unclear how did you arrive at the conclusion that there is no magic. Most of us don't know what the magic is, because this word has very little meaning after countless centuries of misinterpretation. We both know for sure that there are many tricks, superstitions, delusions, selfish motivations and much more of the unknown.

You just pointed out, that training and superior secret knowledge make a difference. There are things that few trained and experienced people can do, and untrained, inexperienced majority can't. We live in time, when the science should slowly acknowledge, that everything which exists is energy, vibrating at different rates. If we take that to a conclusion, we should question what really is that physicality, materiality and naturalness that you're so fond of.

It is the hidden part of the world that forms the seen world, not otherwise. What we see are effects of hidden causes. For every natural law, there is a superior natural law that allows an ingenious mind to use certain circumstances to overcome the inferior natural law. Look at gravity, a few centuries ago people didn't believe they can overcome it. Only witches on brooms were said to fly.
Bob Spence said that there is only one reality. But another wise person said, that there are three realities. A reality of the reactionary, a reality that leaves you as you are, and a reality that makes you evolve. Magic of today is the science of tomorrow.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:I suggest -

Luminon wrote:
I suggest - take one person with awareness of chi energy - like me, scan his brain activity, specially the one related to tactile perception or anything unusual, and compare it to brain activity of a person with no feeling of chi, etheric body or anything like that. Ask the person A to do a few tricks with the chi - stimulate it, concentrate it in some center, shift it around the body and so on. (just say it, they should know what to do) Then scan him and compare it to the records of a person B doing nothing.

I'd gladly volunteer for such an experiment if it would be scheduled for some days off and expenses would be covered.

That sounds good.

Actually, I would be extremely surprised if something like that hasn't already been done. I don't know about any such experiments though.

Luminon wrote:
Consider how much time modern scientists devoted to the study of chi, and how much time the ancient sources did. China, India, Japan, even modern Theosophists, their sources describe the workings of chi into great detail.

Yes, but I don't judge the research by modern scientists to be equal to studies by people in various cultures in the past; it's just not the same. "Research" was not rigorous, largely anecdotal, subject to confirmation bias, etc. Hundreds of accounts of personal experiences with chi isn't worth as much as one reliable method of obtaining objective evidence. 

Luminon wrote:
The problem is, that scientists always want evidence first, unless someone funded their research in advance.

That is somewhat of a problem, but I think you're exaggerating by far. There are currently many scientists around the world working to test ideas that are considered pseudoscience.  

Luminon wrote:
And you're not interested to learn about it unless you get evidence in advance. That is understandable, it's just... not helpful, you see?

I am interested to a very limited extent. I consider the possibility of any idea, but if it has no evidence yet, why should I be more interested in it than in any other pseudoscience?

Luminon wrote:
What if proving the truth needs some research in advance to produce the evidence needed for research? Well, then all the scientific glory is left up to coincidence, if the evidence ever shows up or not.

Well, we don't need to ask "what if." That is precisely how it works.

We have to experiment and gather evidence to support a claim. I would not reject claims and then oppose conducting tests to evaluate those claims. That is irrational and silly. In fact, if I was in a position to carry out research myself, I would not mind exploring these subjects.

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Brian37

Luminon wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

You felt what you wanted to feel or what you expected to feel. Placebos can feel real without being real and all depend on the gullibility of the person wanting to feel something.

I know that, fortunately this is not about wanting. My etheric sensitivity is inborn, I remember having it as a small child, long before I had any idea what's going on or that it is something unusual among people. I never wished for the chi energy to exist, it was always there and is there every day of my life. I can't wish for something that I already have.

Brian37 wrote:
Lum, I give you no special treatment just because you are a nice guy. You are in the same boat to me as all the other people who come in here with their unfounded claims. If you had something, it would be WIDELY testable beyond conspiracy and every major science organization and every major credible university would teach/test it it as serious science.

Hey. I'm on a beginning of life journey yet. I have other priorities for now than advancing the science. That is, to live a stabilized life on my own, in a stabilized world. I need money to pay for food, dorm rent and tuition. This is why for now I have the Chi stuff as a hobby, I discuss it with people, learn about science, learn about esotericism, write down ideas, try minor personal experiments, try to meet with useful people, and so on. 

 

You want to prove physically something that is not yet recognized as physical thing, that's quite a lot. There is having something and having something. People who use stuff like Chi have the Chi itself, but they have no idea whatsoever what it is and how it works, much less in scientific terms. They don't care, they just use it and live their little lives. They can't explain in scientific terms why Chi moves in them, but does not move an arrow on some meter. It may be widely testable, but first someone must have an idea what exactly we are trying to test. It's an interesting dead-end. Scientists might study Chi, understand it and make it physically testable, but first they need a physical evidence for it.

Brian37 wrote:
Falling for a show only means you fell for a show and their are really great salespeople, but all being a salesperson means is that you are good at selling something, even if it is crap.

I'm afraid to go out unless I can surely prove my claims. For that, I won't regret many years of preparation and study. The more skepticism I see, the longer I want to prepare. There are certain people my family knows, who lost everything they had because they failed to sell their scientific discovery. They were alone and had no backup plan, just like me. I'm not gonna speed things up, safety goes first.

 

Lum,

Everyone needs something to keep them focused and balanced in life. I just warn against mistaking a placebo as fact. Whatever meditation or physical exorcise you partake in is only a physical benefit, not a magical super pill.

I write poetry and I debate on line, and watch my Redskins suck huge donkey balls. That is my balance. That is my escape. What I don't do is assign anything I use to pass the time to keep me sane as some sort of magic.

Chi, like Yoga, and even Native American sweat tents are beneficial ONLY in a physical sense in that they are used as a coping mechanism for relieving stress. The labels themselves hold no magical power and are not special.

The actions humans take to relieve stress are not magical. Humans do this in a variety of ways and falsely asign this normal human behavior to magical superstition.

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
butterbattle wrote:That

Brian37 wrote:

Lum,

Everyone needs something to keep them focused and balanced in life. I just warn against mistaking a placebo as fact. Whatever meditation or physical exorcise you partake in is only a physical benefit, not a magical super pill.

I don't know what do you mean by placebo, it does not fit the description.  This strange perception of mine is inborn with lifetime duration, it can not be possibly an effect of placebo, wishful thinking, indoctrination, delusion and so on. Behind all this there is a puzzled yet normally thinking brain in a very unusual situation, not a deluded brain spicing up an ordinary life situation.
Yes, I've participated on many therapies and meditations, but only for mundane purposes like development of character or as a service. I don't need to gather more woo abilities than I already have. I also don't need any unusual means to relieve stress.

Brian37 wrote:
I write poetry and I debate on line, and watch my Redskins suck huge donkey balls. That is my balance. That is my escape. What I don't do is assign anything I use to pass the time to keep me sane as some sort of magic.

Chi, like Yoga, and even Native American sweat tents are beneficial ONLY in a physical sense in that they are used as a coping mechanism for relieving stress. The labels themselves hold no magical power and are not special.

The actions humans take to relieve stress are not magical. Humans do this in a variety of ways and falsely asign this normal human behavior to magical superstition.

Again, I have diffculty seeing what you mean. My strange perception of chi and similar things has nothing to do with coping mechanisms or relieving stress. It simply coexists as one of things that can receive my attention during the day. And IMHO, if something (the chi) is more responsive to thought than to solid matter, then it is more "magical" than physical.

I relieve stress (if I ever have any) by reading books, listening to weird music, discussing online, and so on. If there is anything I need to keep me balanced and sane, it's an effort to stir my emotionality and pay attention to here and now.

 

butterbattle wrote:

That sounds good.

Actually, I would be extremely surprised if something like that hasn't already been done. I don't know about any such experiments though.

You see, even logical ideas may sometimes wait for realization. So much for "if that would be true, science would already know " Smiling OK, there were some measurements taken, like this one. I'd love it to have any impact on opinions of local skeptics, but it seems to me there's not much information. I have no idea what is the ULF method (ultralente or ultraslow brain potentials) and it's obviously a 1996's translation from German.

What would such an experiment require? The observations should be taken at great detail, in the beginning to determine at least which brain centers are  active and which aren't. I already thought about functional magnetic resonance imaging. But yesterday in a skeptical podcast I heard that this method isn't reliable, it depends how well you interpret the results. Are there any more modern and better methods than fMRI?

For example, as a comparative activity of brain the people will have to get very busy, so they have no mental capacity left for chi. An ideal thing would be to measure the chi person playing some Tetris or Snake on cell phone. Which is not possible during fMRI, because it would fry the cell phone.

butterbattle wrote:
Yes, but I don't judge the research by modern scientists to be equal to studies by people in various cultures in the past; it's just not the same. "Research" was not rigorous, largely anecdotal, subject to confirmation bias, etc. Hundreds of accounts of personal experiences with chi isn't worth as much as one reliable method of obtaining objective evidence.
It's not equal, of course. But I believe it would save a lot of time with location of the alleged energetic centers on the body and meridians connecting them. My people currently study a related Theosophic literature and it closely describes a complex system most similar to electric wiring. It describes which centres are connected to which, (and together forming triangles) what kind of energy flows in them and where are the membranes that ihibit the flow of energy for safety reasons.
All I want here is a simple electronic database of such information, projected on 3D model of human body that would be easy to use as an instrument for research and updated according to further needs. Scientists don't have to start searching with nothing.

The impression I get from such accounts is, that people who wrote them were clairvoyant, they could see these things and simply wrote down what they saw. To avoid the mythology and folklore it would be best to use the Tibetyan's books, which is the Theosophic source that I use. He uses modern language, modern terms and if any mythology, then only to explain how ancient cultures called this or that.

butterbattle wrote:
That is somewhat of a problem, but I think you're exaggerating by far. There are currently many scientists around the world working to test ideas that are considered pseudoscience. 
I hope so, but I doubt they take care to know their subject of research in depth. I'd rather call them "foragers of evidence". If there is no evidence at the reach of hand, they move on. Many scientists may assume that they search for something that will advance their field somewhat, not something that will turn everything upside down.

But when it comes to investigating the woo, one must search exactly for that, to expect the unexpected. All the esotericism tells people to search for certain new states of matter, of consciousness, for new dimensions, for new forms of basic energies like electricity or fire, for new forms of life, intelligent life, and where all that fits into the esoteric cosmology. The cosmology, that stops right on the border with what the science already found out. Dark matter itself is today the borderland, which both science and esotericism are greatly interested in. Now, the trick is to try to follow what the esotericism proposes (with no evidence given in advance) and see if there is something to discover.

butterbattle wrote:
I am interested to a very limited extent. I consider the possibility of any idea, but if it has no evidence yet, why should I be more interested in it than in any other pseudoscience?
Well, it's usually like people study the mystical arts first and then they get to some evidence. It's like in sports, people first train their muscles and then they overcome records, not in reverse order. Unless someone finds a better way.

The advantage is, that the relevant and usable esotericism is only one, you don't need to learn all woo traditions, only the one which all the woo traditions have in common.

butterbattle wrote:
Well, we don't need to ask "what if." That is precisely how it works.

We have to experiment and gather evidence to support a claim. I would not reject claims and then oppose conducting tests to evaluate those claims. That is irrational and silly. In fact, if I was in a position to carry out research myself, I would not mind exploring these subjects.

Sure, experiments are necessary. I only say they should be firstly experiments that try to follow the esoteric teaching in all its complexity, not trying to find "natural explanations" which lead nowhere. If something can be explained naturally, it does not yet mean that the natural explanation was really the case. People may be tempted to simplify the things to explain them away.

In case of esotericism, one can not say the answer is superstition, mythology or tradition, that would be the same as Goddidit. The best answer is to document how exactly that tradition or mythology appeared.
For example, there is a weird catholic mythology of Mary the Mother and her eventual ascension to Heaven and marriage with God. This is nothing else but thoroughly disguised description of getting control of human lower material nature (matter depicted as our mother) and human higher spiritual nature (spirit = divine father) that occurs in certain high stage of personal development. Even the crucifixtion itself probably refers to the fact, that there are etheric membranes in head that intersect each other in shape of a cross. Their natural dissolution to give way to spiritual energies is again a moment in high stage of personal development, called "crucifixtion" or "great renunciation".

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:OK, there were

Luminon wrote:
OK, there were some measurements taken, like this one. I'd love it to have any impact on opinions of local skeptics, but it seems to me there's not much information. I have no idea what is the ULF method (ultralente or ultraslow brain potentials) and it's obviously a 1996's translation from German.

Eh, there's too many unsupported assertions and fancy ambiguous language. 

- First of all, I don't even know what the ULP is, so I can't effectively evaluate their statements about it. But this: "The level of ULP closely correlates to the flow of energy in the body: clarity, efficiency, health, the ability to concentrate, the ability to react, the sexual experience and other mental activities." seems very suspicious. This sounds like pseudoscience. It's a magic measuring device; this one device can measure your health(?), "clarity (what's that?)," sexual experience (!), ability to react (how?), etc. all at the same time. 

- What is an inner smile? His heart "smiles?" And feels "love?" How are they measuring "energy levels?" Stimulate his "life energy?" "Main meridians" of the body? "...and starts to balance the left and right hemisphere of the brain." What does that even mean? "Then Master Chia closes the orbit..." Que?

- "Western science has shown that the abdomen also has a brain, which is connected to the larger brain in the head." There is an organ in the abdomen that helps with autonomic functions? Why call it another brain? That's kind of misleading, isn't it?

Luminon wrote:
Are there any more modern and better methods than fMRI?

There are many other methods, but I don't know if any of them are what you need...

Luminon wrote:
For example, as a comparative activity of brain the people will have to get very busy, so they have no mental capacity left for chi. An ideal thing would be to measure the chi person playing some Tetris or Snake on cell phone. Which is not possible during fMRI, because it would fry the cell phone.

There should definitely be ways to get around that.

Luminon wrote:
It's not equal, of course. But I believe it would save a lot of time with location of the alleged energetic centers on the body and meridians connecting them. My people currently study a related Theosophic literature and it closely describes a complex system most similar to electric wiring. It describes which centres are connected to which, (and together forming triangles) what kind of energy flows in them and where are the membranes that ihibit the flow of energy for safety reasons.

All I want here is a simple electronic database of such information, projected on 3D model of human body that would be easy to use as an instrument for research and updated according to further needs. Scientists don't have to start searching with nothing.

Of course. Directly addressing and focusing on what people are claiming would resolve the issue a lot faster.

Luminon wrote:
But when it comes to investigating the woo, one must search exactly for that, to expect the unexpected. All the esotericism tells people to search for certain new states of matter, of consciousness, for new dimensions, for new forms of basic energies like electricity or fire, for new forms of life, intelligent life, and where all that fits into the esoteric cosmology. The cosmology, that stops right on the border with what the science already found out. Dark matter itself is today the borderland, which both science and esotericism are greatly interested in. Now, the trick is to try to follow what the esotericism proposes (with no evidence given in advance) and see if there is something to discover.

Heh. We're working on it. Well....not we, because I'm a not scientist, but yeah.

Luminon wrote:
Sure, experiments are necessary. I only say they should be firstly experiments that try to follow the esoteric teaching in all its complexity, not trying to find "natural explanations" which lead nowhere. If something can be explained naturally, it does not yet mean that the natural explanation was really the case. People may be tempted to simplify the things to explain them away.

Lol. Well, if they lead nowhere, then obviously you don't want to go down that route, but then you're just begging the question. If trying to find natural explanations led nowhere, then it wasn't possible to explain it naturally. If there is a plausible natural explanation, then the esoteric explanation is unjustified. Either way, it is still unjustified unless there is sufficient positive evidence.

 

Sure, we'll eventually explore every esoteric teaching in detail, but we're never going to stop trying to come up with alternative explanations. That is the rational and skeptical thing to do.

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


funknotik
atheist
funknotik's picture
Posts: 159
Joined: 2007-12-10
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:My etheric

Luminon wrote:
My etheric sensitivity is inborn, I remember having it as a small child, long before I had any idea what's going on or that it is something unusual among people. I never wished for the chi energy to exist, it was always there and is there every day of my life. I can't wish for something that I already have.

This sounds like something I've read before. I've heard it's common for mutant powers to manifest during puberty. Have you researched  Xavier Institute for Higher Learning? They can teach you to control your mutant powers for the benefit of all mankind. The X-Men can help you. Luminon is great super hero name by the way.

http://marvel.wikia.com/Xavier%27s_School_for_Gifted_Youngsters


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
funknotik wrote:Luminon

funknotik wrote:

Luminon wrote:
My etheric sensitivity is inborn, I remember having it as a small child, long before I had any idea what's going on or that it is something unusual among people. I never wished for the chi energy to exist, it was always there and is there every day of my life. I can't wish for something that I already have.

This sounds like something I've read before. I've heard it's common for mutant powers to manifest during puberty. Have you researched  Xavier Institute for Higher Learning? They can teach you to control your mutant powers for the benefit of all mankind. The X-Men can help you. Luminon is great super hero name by the way.

http://marvel.wikia.com/Xavier%27s_School_for_Gifted_Youngsters

LOL Sometimes one can't help but compare some fantasy or sci-fi motives. Some my experiences and people would make a good basis for decent anime series Smiling As for what I'm trying to do or prepare for, let's see the official dry definitions. 'Occultism': wise use of energy. 'White magic': bringing positive changes in society through correct thought, word and action. Contrary to popular belief, it is mainly a work and service, not throwing fireballs.

Well, I always wondered why those superheroes in tights just do the dirty job of cleaning the mess after the mistakes of politicians and corporations. Muscles they have, but brains not. Every villain has a story of suffering some injustice but nobody hears them out until much collateral damage is done and new police and army budget is approved.
An enlightened social engineer, grassroots activist and high-level lobbyist can prevent more crimes every day than Superman on a busy month.

Dammit, another social lecture Sticking out tongue

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


NoMoreCrazyPeople
atheistSuperfan
NoMoreCrazyPeople's picture
Posts: 969
Joined: 2009-10-14
User is offlineOffline
Sandycane wrote:Yes, the

Sandycane wrote:

Yes, the power of the mind is immense and not just over itself.

'mind over matter', 'power of persuasion', etc...

A focused mind can be a very powerful tool especially when combined with chi energy.

I suppose this is a hoax, too?

 

As somewhat of a martial artist, or at least an enthusiast (wish I had more time to train) this stuff has never impressed me too much (in any supernatural power kind of way), they can only do what is humanly possible.  I could break 3-4 pieces of 3/4" pine jumping over 4 people in grade 8 no problem as long as the person holding the wood knew to hold it against the grain.  If that person turns all 4 pieces of wood 90 degrees and holds them with the grain, I'm landing on my butt and the boards are going nowhere.  Concrete is just powder, no grain, it is very susceptible to cracks, that's why in construction they mix rebar with concrete, a concrete foundation alone is useless, it will crack and fall apart.  If they mixed in metal or fibreglass fibres into the concrete these guys would break their hands.  Cool demonstrations though, it certainly takes allot of conditioning and focus, but no chi involved here.  Something that is much more impressive is some martial artists ability to take almost impossible strikes, I certainly cannot do this at this time, I have seen some very impressive demonstrations of this, 4 even 5 punches and kicks at a time, but I can't find the best footage I have seen.  These videos show the discipline, start the first video around 4:30.  Some of the more impressive videos showcasing this ability (power shot to liver, right hook to jaw, high kick to the temple/neck, 5 shots at once) made me wonder what I could possibly do as an opponent to someone like this in the ring or out trained to strike just like with the same moves as the pros they brought in for the demos.    

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB7gnB31NnI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a86cQobU-n4&feature=related

 

Still no chi though, just unbelievable conditioning. 

 


NoMoreCrazyPeople
atheistSuperfan
NoMoreCrazyPeople's picture
Posts: 969
Joined: 2009-10-14
User is offlineOffline
ProzacDeathWish

ProzacDeathWish wrote:

Sandycane wrote:

 

 

Chi is just one part of Oriental Philosophy and traditional Oriental medicine. Acupuncture, Chinese Tonic herbs, meditation, Tai Chi, etc... all are methods of improving the mind and body and achieving a balance necessary for optimum health.

Chi is just as valid as Yin & Yang.

    That's why I purposely avoided specific martial arts that attempted to predicate success in combat based upon the use of chi or any similar esoteric forces.    When I was younger I chose Muay Thai for it's utter pragmatism and it's simple reliance upon the use of meat and bone as effective weapons. No chi required.

                            

 

 

 

 

Which is why proper Muay Thai fighters dominate all other sport stand up combat styles 8 out of 10 times.  They train to fight, that's it.  Their simple chop leg kicks to the knee annihilate people who aren't trained for it, nothing fancy, they just do what works.  Muay Thai will always be my favourite stand-up combat style, flying scissor knee is my favourite move.   Then their are always the illusive shoalin monks, which are almost impossible to find actually fighting 100%,  real footage is very rare.  Check out this video of a real shaolin monk messing around with an mma fighter.  This white guy in the video looks like a moderately trained mma fighter, in a real fight he might have knock out power (who knows) but I doubt his ability to catch this monk coming in.  These elbows to the back of the neck and spinning back claw to the face are devastating blows but illegal in the ring.  I would love to see a Thai fighter vs a proper shoalin monk 100% although it might be deadly.  Still no chi here.    

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRSzBzgVEUA  


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
There have been quite a few

There have been quite a few 'blind' studies where meridians and chi points have been shown to not exist. IOW when 'believers' thought some contact was on a meridian or chi point, there reaction was the same, whether or not it really was on some 'special' position. So it is purely psychological.

 

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:There have

BobSpence1 wrote:

There have been quite a few 'blind' studies where meridians and chi points have been shown to not exist. IOW when 'believers' thought some contact was on a meridian or chi point, there reaction was the same, whether or not it really was on some 'special' position. So it is purely psychological.

 

Deepak Chopra and Oprah wrote:

Which proves they exist, because when you *think* about them it causes them to exist, just like in quantum mechanics and that kitty!  Hah, we win!

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:There have

BobSpence1 wrote:

There have been quite a few 'blind' studies where meridians and chi points have been shown to not exist. IOW when 'believers' thought some contact was on a meridian or chi point, there reaction was the same, whether or not it really was on some 'special' position. So it is purely psychological.

Meridians are just such a wires or veins for chi, not the main centers. Hell, I'm not aware of my own meridians unless they start hurting. Common people have hardly a chance of recognizing one, just like they're not aware of their normal blood veins. I can normally feel 4 of my main chakras plus the rest if I stir them up, and of course two lesser palm chakras. Don't you want from me to perceive the tiny little points and lines which are the meridians.

Anyway, I had my chi points on meridians tested through surfacial skin resistance and the results correlated with my health state tested a couple of days earlier through blood test. If some scientists can't do such a simple experiment successfully, then what good are they? All they need is to send a few people on blood test and then send them to alternative medicine practitioner proficient with EAV meter (like the one I sometimes visit) and then compare the results. If it worked for me, then it should work for everyone.
Typically, the healer I know tests each meridian point 10 times, every time hitting the same skin resistance in that point, then she writes it down and goes on. It all takes about 10 minutes per person. The results in kiloohms give sense, they show the health state of organs through which a particular meridian goes. It's so simple that even a skeptic should understand it. 70 kiloohms is very good, 50 is average, and lesser than that down to about 35 or less, that's a problem.

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Skin resistance is certainly

Skin resistance is certainly affected by the moisture content of the surface layers of the skin, and any dissolved substances in that moisture, so it is entirely reasonable that there will be a correlation between such measurements and all kinds of states of the mind and body, as 'lie detectors' have relied upon for years.

The problem is that it is potentially affected by so many things within the body, that it is almost impossible to draw valid conclusions about the detailed state of specific organs. A chemical analysis of a swab of skin moisture, or a tiny sample of skin cells would provide far more information.

The issue with meridian lines and chi points is that the evidence is that there are no consistently and systematically identifiable locations on the body that correspond to the elaborate theories and drawings of imagined networks associated with such ideas. Whenever tests are done so that the subject cannot clearly identify the location being touched, the results either disappear or are independent of the specific location. Once you get away from certain areas such as the fingertips and to some extent the palms of the hands, our ability to identify the exact location of a touch while our eyes are closed or blind-folded is very imprecise.

Some areas of the body are also more likely to reflect the state of the body, and maybe certain organs, than others, and this may well be reflected in more dense concentrations of magic lines and points, but a more accurate picture would simply shade that whole region with an appropriate color code, rather than the imagined lines and points.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Skin

BobSpence1 wrote:

Skin resistance is certainly affected by the moisture content of the surface layers of the skin, and any dissolved substances in that moisture, so it is entirely reasonable that there will be a correlation between such measurements and all kinds of states of the mind and body, as 'lie detectors' have relied upon for years.

The problem is that it is potentially affected by so many things within the body, that it is almost impossible to draw valid conclusions about the detailed state of specific organs. A chemical analysis of a swab of skin moisture, or a tiny sample of skin cells would provide far more information.

Well then, this is why the hypothesis says that there are the meridians which pass only through certain organs and their outlets show by skin resistance the health state of these organs. It has to do with nerve and endocrine system. Meridians are intermediaries between these and etheric body which overreaches our physical body a little.
This is why I have seen, that the meridian point resistance reacts on a substance in bottle that I hold at the time. This is another diagnostic method. When the state of organs is measured through resistance on the points, the patient holds the electrodes but also one or more boxes with medicine. The measurements differ according to how is the medicine useful. If a patient has liver problems and then holds something that contains a liver remedy, then the one liver meridian point will get into high resistance values, as long as the patient holds the remedy. Otherwise it does not occur.
This works thanks to the etheric body which interacts with the substance in the box and responds to it accordingly through its meridians. In this way I can get prescribed exactly the remedies I need. Cell and blood analysis would surely give much more information, but it is expensive, it takes a long time and then you have to decide which remedies to use. This procedure just shows an automatic vital response to proper or improper remedy.

This is very simple transparent procedure which lets you see exactly how it works. There is no mystery or magic involved. (except of the phase where she prescribes me the dosage, but that is also explainable) It should work for anyone.

BobSpence1 wrote:
The issue with meridian lines and chi points is that the evidence is that there are no consistently and systematically identifiable locations on the body that correspond to the elaborate theories and drawings of imagined networks associated with such ideas. Whenever tests are done so that the subject cannot clearly identify the location being touched, the results either disappear or are independent of the specific location. Once you get away from certain areas such as the fingertips and to some extent the palms of the hands, our ability to identify the exact location of a touch while our eyes are closed or blind-folded is very imprecise.

Some areas of the body are also more likely to reflect the state of the body, and maybe certain organs, than others, and this may well be reflected in more dense concentrations of magic lines and points, but a more accurate picture would simply shade that whole region with an appropriate color code, rather than the imagined lines and points.

My acupuncturist and EAV diagnostic never had any problems with finding people's meridian points. They found them instantly and got valid results from using these points. Either measurements, or physical changes that can not be placebo - like instant disappearing of allergic reaction. I'd have no idea why this is such a problem.

I don't know. I don't know how they do it, if they feel the points or probably thanks to many years or decades of practice. I also don't know if there are more meridian schemes and how is called the one they use. But I should be able to identify them, simply by pointing at these schemes that have the meridians, points or centers which I feel that they are there or if they hurt or burn me. For example, I often have such a burning feeling of certain points between my toes. This is quite a problem when trying to get asleep in a heated room. But these are surely are certain points recognized by acupuncture or reflexology.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
the phrase "stay away...

the phrase "stay away... from the voodoo" comes to mind

 


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
http://www.resmedjournal.com/

Study

 

Like all these studies right?  Oh, wait...

Quote:

 

Abstract 

Previous studies of acupuncture in asthma have reported conflicting results, some claiming benefit for some patients. We conducted a randomized, double-blind (patient and evaluator) study in 23 non-smoking asthmatics (10 M; 13 F) aged 43 ± 15 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 59 ± 16% pred. After initial assessment (respiratory function tests and Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire) patients were randomized to receive either ‘real’ or ‘sham’ acupuncture. The measurements were repeated within 1 h and after 2 weeks. Patients were recording peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) throughout the period of the study. After 2 weeks patients who received ‘real’ treatment on the first visit received ‘sham’ treatment and vice versa. The measurements were again repeated within 1 h and after 2 weeks. There was no improvement in any aspects of respiratory function measured after either form of acupuncture. Despite this there was a significant improvement in AQLQ and parallel reduction in the usage of bronchodilators. We concluded that in some patients acupuncture could be useful in improving quality of life and reducing the need for using bronchodilators either by having a placebo effect or that the exact site of needle puncture on the chest is unimportant.

 

Studies like this tend to show the same thing...this crap actually works, but it is only a placebo effect.  When you *ask* someone if they are better after alternative medicine they say yes.  If you actually test if they are better in a scientific way (blow in the tube, measure flow rate), there is no improvement.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline

BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Luminon, there is no

Luminon, there is no systematic study that demonstrates any of that. There is no way to prove, without some fairly invasive probing, or maybe at least an expensive full-body CT scan, that the actual state of any of your internal organs correlates with any such test or external resistance measurement.

And of course  some woo practitioner will instantly 'find' a meridian point.  A valid test would be to pick a point at random and compare, except it would be hard to arrange, since the subject would have to believe the person doing it was  real 'practioner', since a 'real' practioner would almost certainly not participate in such a test.

Although acupuncture itself has been thoroughly proven to be no better than placebo.

 

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


ProzacDeathWish
atheist
ProzacDeathWish's picture
Posts: 4149
Joined: 2007-12-02
User is offlineOffline
NoMoreCrazyPeople

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:

 

Which is why proper Muay Thai fighters dominate all other sport stand up combat styles 8 out of 10 times.  They train to fight, that's it.  Their simple chop leg kicks to the knee annihilate people who aren't trained for it, nothing fancy, they just do what works.  Muay Thai will always be my favourite stand-up combat style, flying scissor knee is my favourite move.   Then their are always the illusive shoalin monks, which are almost impossible to find actually fighting 100%,  real footage is very rare.  Check out this video of a real shaolin monk messing around with an mma fighter.  This white guy in the video looks like a moderately trained mma fighter, in a real fight he might have knock out power (who knows) but I doubt his ability to catch this monk coming in.  These elbows to the back of the neck and spinning back claw to the face are devastating blows but illegal in the ring.  I would love to see a Thai fighter vs a proper shoalin monk 100% although it might be deadly.  Still no chi here.    

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRSzBzgVEUA  

 

  Yeah, I am fan of muay thai.  Most definitely.      

 

  Have you ever thought about how many professional muay thai fighters are *Dutch ?   Who would have associated such a large an avid fan base in Holland, but the results and fight records are undeniable.   ( ie, *Rob Kaman, Ernesto Hoost, Ramon Dekker, etc ) 

   All were literal muay thai wrecking machines when they were at their athletic peaks. They also lost sometimes but hey, shit happens...


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2454
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Luminon,

BobSpence1 wrote:

Luminon, there is no systematic study that demonstrates any of that. There is no way to prove, without some fairly invasive probing, or maybe at least an expensive full-body CT scan, that the actual state of any of your internal organs correlates with any such test or external resistance measurement.

Nope, I think that blood analysis like anyone can have is sufficient to compare the information, if you add to it some long-term health records of a patient. For example, EAV meter can detect a heart weakness or knee sediments that the patient knows very well. It's really best to keep it simple, efficient and expressive, without getting lost in details. The first study should be to show that it really works, other studies might try to tell how.

BobSpence1 wrote:
And of course  some woo practitioner will instantly 'find' a meridian point.  A valid test would be to pick a point at random and compare, except it would be hard to arrange, since the subject would have to believe the person doing it was  real 'practioner', since a 'real' practioner would almost certainly not participate in such a test.
I think a real practitioner would have no idea why such thing is necessary, when it doesn't help to diagnose the patient. They just always put the electrode to the same points between people's knuckles on each hand and foot, (about 10 times each time to show the measurement is the same) write the result down to appropriate section of a tablet and then start all over again, this time with patient also holding one or more kind of remedy.

You'd have a lot of explaining to do, but I think if you'd have yourself diagnosed also in standard way plus pay something for the extra time, there should be no problem. Besides, the herbal remedies from Energy company they sell have very high quality, our top sportsmen use them, for example hockey team, and you know how they won the world cup again recently. These drops and capsules kept me healthy in terrible conditions when I worked in car factory. You could only gain on that. I think you could achieve your right to test stuff with a cordial approach of well-meant curiosity, rather than "Hey quack, prove your right for existence!" I think the old lady that diagnoses me would be glad to show her work to some sympathic and nice scientists. But don't expect her old bones to wait for them for hours or be dragged somewhere far away for tests.

BobSpence1 wrote:
Although acupuncture itself has been thoroughly proven to be no better than placebo.
Can placebo stop instantly an allergic reaction?

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Can placebo

Luminon wrote:

Can placebo stop instantly an allergic reaction?

Sure, if the allergic reaction is psychosomatic.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.