In an earlier thread, the subject of the eternal occurrence was examined.  For greater detail and consideration of the facets of the proposition mentioned here, the original thread may be of interest, and remarks or critiques of it are perhaps best posted there.  This thread builds on the concept, taking it in a new direction.  We vector from this point in the former dialog:

   Proceeding then from this common ground, one concept to juxtapose some ideas from Paul Tillich, a twentieth century theologian.  The eternal recurrence thread discusses the notion of a pattern of existence that each individual is an instance of.  The pattern is eternal and (depending on which model of infinity is valid) existing simultaneously in all possible states of a person's life.   It is common in theories of management and various schools of psychology, to identify sets of traits that are held in common across many different individuals.  Some of these have well developed narratives of recurrent patterns such as the Jungian archetypes of the "Eternal child", the Wise old man, or the Trickster.  Each of these may be thought of as a set of patterns of behavior that are present in the individual patterns of existence described in the eternal recurrence thread.  Depending on the system or psychological school, these personages, or personalty types or collective narratives may be considered by some to be invalid or arbitrary, but however they are viewed, it is possible to view groupings of common behavioral patterns into a set and assign them a name.   One of these is identified as Christ and is considered eternal by Christians.  The eternal recurrence is one way for those with a science orientation of understanding how it is possible for the existence of Christ to be at all compatible with a post enlightenment world view.  Most biblical literalists would deny the validity of this point of view.  They interpret this sort of viewpoint the same way they interpret Tillich's notion of Christian symbols.  To refer to something as a symbol is tantamount to calling it a false fairy tale.  On the contrary,  Tillich and other post literalist Christians would counter that such symbols are no less real than the color red.   Everything we know are in fact representations, making the perceived presence of the eternal Christ in another as no less real than the perception of a particular color.