p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }

Wow! The fact that you stopped posting on the date of the predicted end of the world kind of had me wondering if you were a carefully crafted troll. Apparently not.

Why are you dying?

My Occult Friend,

I'm only a troll because nobody can beat me in the game of intellectual combat on here. I'm like the guy with a boozooka in a knife fight. I have mild nerve agent. It's been fine duing the years. I gues it's affected me slowly during my time in the service. My site is going down as well. But that's okay.

Did you miss me?

My dying shall not be revealed.  Do you like the pet shop boys. Cool music.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Each system of thought has there own language. For example, in atheism they have there own language. Usually of profane vogal words but also philosophically speaking.

Christians think differently then atheists, well, now adays Christians are thinking more and more like atheists, but intelligent ones think differently.

You did really good in defining your terms. Just ask your oppoent to define his terms almost always and slow down. But it sounds like he gets your perspective, he's just busy. You're doing great, just define and slow down more. And bullet proof your arguments.

This was an interesting statement you said:

I've destroyed empiricism so many times it's ridiculous on here. If concepts are not empirical as you admit, then how do we imply these concepts without being inconsistent empiricists? Meaning, if you take this here and this there, via contradictive systems of knowing, then you self refute yourself by definition.

So by definiton, in order for empiricism to be true, it must be consistent. You saying concepts are NOT empirical means you've refuted empiricism on accident. lol. John Locke knew this so he sure danced around this. Philosophical empirists say concepts are empirical since they are reactions of brain squirts. But then  the problem is the symbology of the terms.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Found some interesting stuff.

Even though his theories are obviously missing a lot of scientific data we know posses, and thus are quite archaic, I can relate to the underlining reasoning.  The way I'm formulating my theory is that all knowledge is analogous.  

Since you're a good source of sources, Jean I wonder if you can have another look at this thread and let me know what supporting material/philosophers I should research.  Here's the thread link:

http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/29857

Thank you for your time. 

 Screw dying, I'm living until I die. 

Nothing that ails him that couldn't be fixed with someone's fists...

You bring a bazooka to a knife fight? are you ever going to load the thing?

At best you are an inconsistent Calvinist who has been beaten on this forum in every thread you've been involved in.

If I wanted to believe in a god, that god would not want you as a fan. You are an embarrassment to believers. You are not even the family member who farts at the thanksgiving table.

There are plenty of people who believe in Jesus whom I like and love, you will never be one of them.

Can i buy you a Christmas present? Come on. You would hate it. Oh wait, you don't do Christmas. That' would be atheistic hypocritical act. One of so many.

As I die, if I die, i'll be praising the whole way to the heavens. You will see me now and on my last day breathing. Through my pain I will bow my knee to the one that sustains my being, and my every movement. The One that shows beauty. Or gives a cool breeze on a hot day out of compassion.

The One that allows the birds to sing as the sun rises. For My life and my death, my breath and my steps are for Him alone. Brian, i'm afraid that Christianity today is like a M.C. Hammer at a country music awards ceremony. I mean, what?

I'm consistent. that fact that it pisses you off so bad means that i've struck a nerve. Maybe you are of the elect. Maybe God will grab you by your collor and rescue you from your own evil. From your own hurt and depression. Just maybe. It kind of sounds like that.

I'm a nice guy. But when i'm talking theology, it's like i'm boxing. And i never lose. Each fight is a K.O. You've been knocked down so many times the only thing that is left is whining.

But i still love you Brian. Your anger makes me happy.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Hi Police, he took my purse,

Wow!. Do you smoke the green buddy? lol. Your memory is horrible. For this is a genetical fallacy. THe meaning of Chrisitan has been changed into a new meaning via the law of usus loquendi. So actually, via Christianity, it is no longer a pagan holiday.

the pagan day is the 21st.

Put the Green Bud down and slowly step away. Think of your family Joe.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

And since you worship the pagan construct of Paul that he called Jesus Christ we're back to Christmas being pagan again.

Maybe you should try the bud - it might ease your pain. Then again, only the good die young so I expect you to outlive me by a good amount.

                             What do you do if you see Jean Chauvin staggering around your backyard?

                                                               Reload and try again!

Jean, if in truth, you are gravely ill, in spite of our differences, I am sorry.

HOWEVER given the content of your OP on this thread and some of your other threads, I can not help but wonder, if you are just someone that is probably having a laugh at our expense and simply trying it out at a different angle.

Although I have enjoyed arguing with you on other threads in the past, I simply just believe that you are enjoying this and merely acting the parody of how fanatical theists behave.

Sorry. but I just simply can not take this seriously. You don't seem to be acting like the few people that I know that have had terminal illness, you seem to be enjoying yourself.

Not many people that I know that would say "Hey I am dying, but I am listening to the Pet Shop Boys, awesome music".

You see why I am taking this claim with a grain of salt ?

  Fits of hysterical laughter

Clearly you've failed your god. Too bad you chose to fail humanity too. You've been too much of a delusional asshole for me to care.

Sure he backfired, but I think it's only because of the way he and the ones he was arguing with understand of dialoguing. When he says he silenced atheists I have little doubt he is telling the truth, but that doesn't mean he won the argument.

JC to me seems pretty accultured, the problem is how he interpret his knowledge and the world. Until now his behavior seems coherent with a normal theist, attention and insecurity are not at the 'danger' level (but I'm not entirely sure).

What's happening to rrs?? This days I require half a day for editing a comment!

p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }

epistemologist and insists that instead of using learned concepts to define the knowable world - concepts garnered through a youthful process of discovery and first hand experience - humans are instead born with a stock of conceptual templates sewn into their brains allowing them to 'know what they know'.

Because the current state of neurology means we don't understand the thought process properly, Jean and his ilk are able to lever open this knowledge gap and implant an appeal to complexity inside. We don't understand thought so it's spirit, they cry. Ultimately, his assertion is stark naked.  

Well we know that our concepts are fixed in the brain with a process that makes use of proteins, and there are branches of science like cognitive psychology and knowledge representation that are working on how we learn, so it's only a matter of searching the truth, it's not like there is a gap to exploit with ad ignorantiam fallacies. Even when in doubt about the theory, virtual and real neural networks that learn have been made.

So i got back from Mt. Saint Helens last week. I thought it was going to be an 11 mile hike. Turned out to be 14 miles. Very hard. Especially with my health.

On the first day, we hiked down Harmony Trail to study the logs in the lake. Off trail and difficult. We slept in a pit not really a lava bed but a bed formed by steam.

The first 10 minutes of our  hike on the first say i spained my ankle. That night it was swollen like a grapefruit. The next morning it still hurt but the swelling when down. So i continued.

Eventually we were on the bottem of the little grand canyon. The strata and arrangement very similar to the Grand Canyon in Arizona. I'll discuss thise things in another post if I can find it.

We walked along a very narrow ridge where only one foot at times could fit with 200 foot drop offs on the west side of Johnston's Ridge.

That was a week ago and i'm still hurting. I will share some of my findinngs later. The stupidity of atheism is yet again shown by the effects of a volcanoe.

I will not enclose pictures since you atheists are like Mao and may hunt me down to kill me. It's like a Satanist never lies? or a demon? Or an atheist lol.

Even liberals adhere to a Jesus, they just redefine them so that there guilt can be settled in their bowl.

and yes, i feel the love. And no, i'm for real. But harlsportster? My Madre has a harly Sportster and she's old. lol.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

But... you're going to heaven, so you shouldn't be worried about dying, right? ...right?

He's a Calvinist. He's not sure whether he's one of the elect that God selected from the beginning. When he claims he knows he's going to heaven, he's lying. Jean, the 9th commandment isn't an option for you, remember?

You guys are so sweet. Wishing me dead. I guess i kind of understand since i'm one of the very few on here that is destroying your arguments. What would Jesus drive? a tank.

I'm not afraid of death. The torture part may be painful but I believe God will give me the faith (increased faith) to handle it until i'm with Him.

Um, lol, i am 100% positive that i'm among the elect. Via there fruits you shall know. Also, the mere joy I get each time i exterminate an atheistic argument and the immense joy it brings me is also another reason.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Aww. That just really hurt my feelings. My sportster is 1200 cc and has outridden alot of hotshots that thought they were bad boys. However, I don't need to prove anything. It seems that once we quit debating religious subjects, the only replies that you have had to me are belittling comments about the fact that I ride a Sportster Harley. Is that all that you have to "defeat" empiricism and atheism ? Surely you can do better than that, can't you ? BTW. Do you ride ? If so, how often ? I have ridden in rain, sleet and snow . Has your "madre " ?