Debunking Denialism blog
Offline I'm really enjoying interacting with Emil Karlsson of the Debunking Denialism blog, so I thought I should recommend it to anyone interested. He seems to be a dedicated rational activist, with a nice and organized style of writing. He has been doing a series on pseudoskeptics and debate tactics, which he analyzes in a pro- vs. con- way that I think is really productive for discussion. His latest post is The Struggle Against Poultry, which is a response to my recent bit about Evidence Chicken. It includes links to his previous entries in the series, so check it out if you're interested!
Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!
Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!
- Login to post comments
I have read the first two and the fourth, interesting stuff. I found it more of a classification reference rather than any informative approach guide, save for your comments.
"Don't seek these laws to understand. Only the mad can comprehend..." -- George Cosbuc
The pwnage post... not sure the study offered as an example is analogous (and he offers as much) but I agree to the conclusion to some degree. In most cases, intellectual arrogance will lead to a reverse effect, especially if the audience shares some of the beliefs ridiculed.
"Don't seek these laws to understand. Only the mad can comprehend..." -- George Cosbuc
Cool reading material.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.