1. A has always been A and will never be ~A. The logical absolutes didn't need God's mind to think of them as God was created much later when humans came on the scene.

2. You don't know what would be harmful to you? I don't know if you should go to church either. It would be safer if you didn't leave the house. The Golden Rule did not come from Jesus originally. It was old when the guys who wrote the OT were young.

I won't discredit the evidence based on the source. Though if the evidence is faulty, or the conclusions mistaken, I'll point it out to you.
If you don't provide it at all, however, you concede the point.

The greatest irony I've ever encountered.

I was going to guess Star Wars, "Return of the Jedi".

Again, until you show God to exist, "God created the universe" and "Nothing created the universe" are identical statements.

Or are you equating God with the logical absolutes?

The information in DNA is evidence although I know you'll dismiss it. Information can only be produced by an intelligent sender and not natural random processes.

There was a point when we didn't know what vocanos actually were. There was a point when we did not know what caused hurricanes. When we finally scientifically figured out what they were we found NO cognition behind them. We found that those natural events were a matter of a process, NOT A WHO. Why the fuck should what we don't know about what came before the big bang be any different?

"God did it" is merely our species flaw in gap filling. It is merely our own self projection of human qualities on the world around us. It is a flaw in our evolution mistaking an infant's desire to be protected by a parent.

THAT is literally the root psychology behind why god belief exists. It is not because gods are real or a scientific possibility, but because we as a species, default far too often than not, to projecting our own desires on the world around us, rather than test our observations to insure quality of data.

Every time we look scientifically at biology and see something cognitive there is always a MATERIAL PROCESS involved. Cognition is a product of evolution, not fictional mythological gods. The universe is a product of a WHAT NOT A WHO. A common house fly and cockroaches have brains(physical locations that control their bodies). That is more than your fictional god.

Your god cannot logically scientifically explain anything other than the fact that people are capable of making up and believing absurd crap. It is absurd to believe that the sun is a god, and even more absurd to believe in a non material brain with magical super powers.

I am sorry it frightens you that there is no god. But we are not the ones who made up those absurd claims. We are simply the ones going "that is not true'.

Cognition is not required for evolution or the cause of the universe. The universe was around before life on this planet and it will be around long after our planet dies.

If you are going to believe that there really is a non material thinking entity pulling the strings of our existence then you should believe that Neptune controls the oceans as well. You know Neptune is not real, so it should not be that much of a stretch for you to reject your pet deity as well.

Tradition is not an excuse. Popularity is not an excuse. If our species never questioned social norms our species never would have left the caves.

TRY PLEASE TRY aiming the same logic you use to reject the pet gods of others and aim it at your own claims. If you can do that, you'll understand why we reject your claim as well.

First off "ignorance" when you use it means "bigot!". "Ignorance" when we use it simply means lacking good information and data.

Now if you insist on using that word I'd say "ignorant" is buying into an ancient comic book that is not close to being a science textbook. It was written in an uninformed age by scientifically ignorant people. It was written over a 1,000 year period, by over 40 authors with books left out.

Genesis alone is laughable. It claims adult women popped out of a man's rib. It creates adult plants without photosynthesis. It treats the sun and moon as separate sources of light. Every page of that comic book reads like that.

Not to mention it claims that a baby can be born without two sets of DNA. It also claims that a man survived rigor mortis.

It is completely understandable WHY those things were once believed. There is absolutely no excuse to cling to such myth now that we know better. It would be like teaching today that the earth is flat  while knowing it is not.

Do not try to blame us for crap we did not write. The Church tried to blame Galileo for telling the truth and we all know how that turned out.

You are not special because you quote the bible. You are not special because you claim a non material magical invisible super brain. You are not doing anything differently than the Ancient Egyptians did in falsely believing the sun was a god.

It is 2011, not 329. We have much better information and data about the nature of reality now.

Airplanes and computers and cell phones and medicine and even social equality came about because of sheding social norms and questioning the superstitions of the past. You can claim your pet deity all you want, we will not stop you from doing that. But do not expect us to refrain from knocking your claims around considering where the source came from.

You have a pet god, big whoopty doo. No one is going to hate you for believing such absurdities, but we are going to knock your claims around in hopes you snap out of your delusion.

A DNA strand doesn't contain information, it is information. It contains processes. Interactions. It does not contain blue prints or hardware specifications or libraries or anything else that can be equated with the term information as it is commonly defined.

I didn't ask you to prove the existence of your parents. I was simply demonstrating a logical concept. You exist because of parents that created you which is analagous to the universe existing because God created it.

If taken out of context it seems to contradict. I guess you forgot why Jesus used parables didn't you? God sends strong delusion to the people that do not believe the truth and have pleasure in unrighteousness.

BS!! If you care to take the time to read.

http://www.trueorigin.org/dawkinfo.asp

http://radaractive.blogspot.com/2010/11/where-does-information-come-from-darwin.html

Now, here is where I shine the flashlight on you and you run(back peddle) under the sink like a cockroach.(not you being the cockroach, just you running away from your bad logic pretending it is not bad)

You, "Everything has a creator" Lets forget we've seen this dead argument a billion times I'll humor you.

Do you really want to cop to that bullshit argument? Really?

If your god created everything then it is ALSO responsible for cancer, ecoli, tsunami's, downs syndrome, ect ect ect. If god started everything then it cannot escape the responsibility of the bad it created too.

In addition,

You know damned well if a Muslim were using this same argument you would not simply say "Allah created everything so therefor Allah is the one true god".

Here is the other reason your argument is utter bullshit.

The ancient polytheists thought that Neptune controlled the oceans but yet you don't claim that Neptune created Hurricanes. You know damned well that hurricanes were NOT created by a cognitive being. You know that a hurricane is merely a result of non cognitive conditions in the atmosphere.

Your problem, and the problem with all believers of all labels is that you assume a WHO in as the cause when nature, like a hurricane, SHOWS us that all it takes is a process, not thought. The universe is no different. Evolution is no different. A who is not needed to explain anything, otherwise Neptune is real and makes hurricanes. Since you know that Neptune is not needed to make hurricanes take it one step further and accept that your pet god claim is not required to explain anything either.

A WHO is not needed as a cause to nature or the universe. Especially a claim that defies scientific logic that tells us cognition is only found in biological evolution.

Otherwise your super hero also created all the nasty stuff on this planet and in the universe as well. Since I know you won't cop to that I'd suggest you throw this argument in the trash can.