Meat eating might have made us human, sorry peta/vegetarians. Not.
Offline Anthropologist Finds Evidence of Hominin Meat Eating 1.5 Million Years Ago: Eating Meat May Have 'Made Us Human'
ScienceDaily (Oct. 3, 2012) — A skull fragment unearthed by anthropologists in Tanzania shows that our ancient ancestors were eating meat at least 1.5 million years ago, shedding new light into the evolution of human physiology and brain development.
"Meat eating has always been considered one of the things that made us human, with the protein contributing to the growth of our brains," said Charles Musiba, Ph.D., associate professor of anthropology at the University of Colorado Denver, who helped make the discovery. "Our work shows that 1.5 million years ago we were not opportunistic meat eaters, we were actively hunting and eating meat."
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
- Login to post comments
Offline Google it. There is a lot of literature around this idea not just for people by animals and it can keep you off the street and out of trouble for days once you get started.
Google a fucking dictionary and you'll find definitions of "culture" that refer to more than the single usage that you are strenuously clinging to. Or just go back to post #199 or post#219 if that's too much work for you.
( ....or perhaps you can convince yourself that some nasty Zionists who worked at Meriam-Webster altered the dictionary entry just to make you look stupid. )
- Login to post comments
Offline digitalbeachbum wrote:3 - I think it, the original post by Vastet, shows that random events can change the course of an entire civilization. Makes me wonder how or why our ancestors first at meat? Was it a dead animal and no fruit or nuts around? Some small family found the dead carcass of a cow and then started to eat specific parts which smelled good? They enjoyed it so much or it changed their brain in a way that they craved it? Then when they bumped in to another group who had no food they taught them to eat the meat. Next they were hunting out cows when ever they could find them?
Wonderful stuff!!!
It isn't a matter of finding something dead and trying to find a use for it until someone decides to take a bite. Lemurs are omnivorous and tree-dwelling. Except for us and a variety of gorilla all related monkies and apes are tree-dwelling full or part time and most will eat anything they can catch. In trees it is mostly eggs and grubs. Eggs of any degree of maturity and then hatchlings are included. It is normal. The only change is the variety of meat eating and for us dependence on it.
And if you remember trying to catch birds and squirrels as a kid you remember it didn't work. For that you needed to throw rocks or spears, in other words use tools to catch animals to eat. Also snares and nets and such but the point being tools expanded the available meat supply. Expanded from things that could not run away like eggs and grubs to things that couldn't run fast enough. That was a huge increase in available meat sources. Eggs and grubs are an occasional bonus to leaf and tuber eating. With tools you can add hunting to the previous gathering.
Once meat allows greater brain development you have a positive feedback loop as smarter people make better hunters. Once the brain can recognize animal tracks it has an adavantage no other animal ever had. That leading to more food would lead to a brain able to figure out how old the tracks are and which are most recent making more meat available. The smart you get the more meat you get.
And then the side benefit that meat allows maximum physical size which means stronger which means bigger game which means more meat.
I believe the first meat eaters were scavengers.
- Login to post comments
Offline A_Nony_Mouse wrote:digitalbeachbum wrote:3 - I think it, the original post by Vastet, shows that random events can change the course of an entire civilization. Makes me wonder how or why our ancestors first at meat? Was it a dead animal and no fruit or nuts around? Some small family found the dead carcass of a cow and then started to eat specific parts which smelled good? They enjoyed it so much or it changed their brain in a way that they craved it? Then when they bumped in to another group who had no food they taught them to eat the meat. Next they were hunting out cows when ever they could find them?
Wonderful stuff!!!
It isn't a matter of finding something dead and trying to find a use for it until someone decides to take a bite. Lemurs are omnivorous and tree-dwelling. Except for us and a variety of gorilla all related monkies and apes are tree-dwelling full or part time and most will eat anything they can catch. In trees it is mostly eggs and grubs. Eggs of any degree of maturity and then hatchlings are included. It is normal. The only change is the variety of meat eating and for us dependence on it.
And if you remember trying to catch birds and squirrels as a kid you remember it didn't work. For that you needed to throw rocks or spears, in other words use tools to catch animals to eat. Also snares and nets and such but the point being tools expanded the available meat supply. Expanded from things that could not run away like eggs and grubs to things that couldn't run fast enough. That was a huge increase in available meat sources. Eggs and grubs are an occasional bonus to leaf and tuber eating. With tools you can add hunting to the previous gathering.
Once meat allows greater brain development you have a positive feedback loop as smarter people make better hunters. Once the brain can recognize animal tracks it has an adavantage no other animal ever had. That leading to more food would lead to a brain able to figure out how old the tracks are and which are most recent making more meat available. The smart you get the more meat you get.
And then the side benefit that meat allows maximum physical size which means stronger which means bigger game which means more meat.
I believe the first meat eaters were scavengers.
Why? Grubs are insects are meat. Nearly hatced eggs and hatchlings are meat. This is half the fun. What do you mean by scavenging? It is also fun getting ahead of the anthropologists -- at least what gets published.
Think it through. Scanvengers and jungles don't go together. Scavengers go with savanahs so kill can be seen and smelled from a distance or height. If scavenging means accidentally coming across something dead it does not differ from grubs and eggs. So if people are on the grasslands they are already on two legs and with some form of tools and they are actively searching for carcasses to scavenge.
If doing that then they are in competition with other scavengers which come in two types, packs like hyenas and vultures which have no group behavior. To have a chance of chasing off hyena they have spears. But if they use them the chase off vultures they can dine on vulture au vin. That is not quite scavenging.
And then there is a more relevant fact. For every ton of big game the tonnage of smaller game increases almost exponentially by decrease in weight. Hunting elephant makes great Hollywood and bringing down Elk makes a great spread in a gun magazine but in all recorded history people have mainly gotten their meat from small animals. And catching small animals is one that can be learned in the forests before going into the grasslands.
There is nothing obvious in favor of scavenging and even if that was an early factor using carcasses to attract game is an obvious early first step. And all the while small game equivalents of rabbits and squirrels have been game to hunt and eat even before moving out on to the plains. There is no obvious clear demarcation to suggest scavenging was a major first step.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
- Login to post comments
Offline A_Nony_Mouse wrote:Google it. There is a lot of literature around this idea not just for people by animals and it can keep you off the street and out of trouble for days once you get started.
Google a fucking dictionary and you'll find definitions of "culture" that refer to more than the single usage that you are strenuously clinging to. Or just go back to post #199 or post#219 if that's too much work for you.
( ....or perhaps you can convince yourself that some nasty Zionists who worked at Meriam-Webster altered the dictionary entry just to make you look stupid. )
What do I use as google terms to confirm your assertion that college pot and rave XTC and heroin and crack whores all share the same culture as you have asserted in claiming there is a single drug culture?
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
- Login to post comments
Offline A_Nony_Mouse wrote:As to long histories, Hitler was a vegetarian and therefore of the same culture as the veggiehead you are defending. In fact both of them are of the same culture and Gandhi by your single culture claim.Does that mean that Gandhi was also a member of the NSDAP ? I learn all kinds of new things from you.
The issue is only veggiehead and they were the same. But since you bring it up India was offered a seat on the International Military Tribunal, you know, the big one, and refused correctly declaring it was sham court of revenge not of justice. After all Stalin and communists were worse by every measure and were never brought to justice.
Hitler declared war on Stalin and we never thanked him.
A_Nony_Mouse wrote:And before you try the usual crap read Sand's Invention of the Jewish People and remember it was that Zionist invention that was adopted by the Nazis. Without it, conversion was the only option. And before getting to excited about that read up on the Transfer agreement, Ha'Avara, which is the collaboration of the Zionists with the Nazis. And be sure to throw a hissy fit.Does anyone who isn't obsessed with this Jew fetish of yours actually spend all of their time memorizing this crap ? Why would I read any of this shit when you can't even bring yourself to read a single entry from an online dictionary that I even provided a link to ?
Since you brought Jews into the discussion for some unstated reason I see no problem with continuing the subject you raised. I would never have brought it up. So as a fetish Jews appear to go with your brass vibrator. If you do not want a subject discussed, do not bring it up.
A_Nony_Mouse wrote:I still like your fisting vibrator.Of course you like it, it's probably the only thing left that can still stimulate your old man nerve endings.
As to your new one, I have always preferred M1 Carbine Enforcer model as very much easier to control but still using a rifle cartridge.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
- Login to post comments
Ok, that makes sense
No I would not say that. But, I see your point.
I wasn't necessarily thinking there was a moral issue at stake. But, I see what you mean. I was merely pondering where I stand on this.
I see
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
sure it isn't. but it is a reason not be a fucking prick.
universals in general are what is fucking up the world. religion is only the most obnoxious one.
"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson
I do not see how when one graduated has anything to do with knowing dictionaries compile common usage and not proper definitions. It has nothing to do with the common usage being a working definition of the word outside of common usage.
However I did graduate long enough ago to recognize the then new usage of "cool" had nothing to do with the temperature. In this case dropping the "sub" does not elevate a group within a culture to a culture itself simply because that is the way people have come to use the word.
Appropriate to some silly arguments we have seen here, a religion has a set of defined characteristics. Calling atheism a religion does not make it a religion even if that becomes commonly used outside the born-again, redneck sub-culture.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
It is interesting when the dictionary is pulled out on the board. Context is also determinative in meaning. Why I was just tempted to do the same in another area of the board (unrelated):
Dictionary : Dorsal :: 'dor·sal' [ dáwrss'l ]
a. of or on the back: relating to or situated on the back of the body
b. Located behind a part or toward the rear of a structure.
c. Relating to the caudal end of the body in quadrupeds or the dorsal side in humans and other primates
etc.
Then by all means feel free to publish your own anal retentive Giwer's Dictionary if you want to restrict yourself to only meanings that satisfy you. Kind of like what Thomas Jefferson did to the Christian Bible if you get my meaning. Snip snip.
Wow, knowing that means you're really "hip". Ooops ! That wasn't the "proper definition" of hip since I wasn't speaking of human anatomy ?
Gee Nony language is difficult !
Right a culture doesn't officially exist until they start printing their own currency and raise an army. ( ..but only in your dictionary )
But I bet you still call native Americans "Indians".
I prefer "indigenous peoples" because they were around before America got dreamed up.
But I'm a smart ass.
"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin
"Mesoamericans" is a much more specific term and at least offers some particulars as to who and where I am referring to. The people referred to as Olmecs and Toltecs offers even more specificity. I suppose "Africa" was dreamed up as well.
"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin
In the good old days angles were obtuse and people were abstruse but the poorly educated said people were obtuse. The usage became so common that the dictionary was changed to accomodate the new usage.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
For a fact most of them call themselves indians but don't let that get in your way. Screw them. They don't know what they are called. Why should they? They are only Indians.
In proper techical newsgroups I refer to them as Amerinds or Amerindians which is the technical term which I am sure irks you to no end since you probably never heard of it. But if you like the term "native" then homo sapiens are only native to South Africa and are migrants every place else in the world. If your definition is who got where first then the British are native New Zealanders.
If you are a native rights advocate based upon first arrival then the peoples of South America are the native North Americans and have a claim to kick out the later arriving North American tribes. And those Johnny come lately eskimos barely beat out the Europeans. Please provide a working definition of native.
I know that is too hard so let me give you an impossible challenge, produce a univerally agreed political definition of native Americans which reflects their absolute rights to land. And make is such that three distinct waves of immigration and two displacements or the previous natives are politically acceptable.
I know, us old farts insist upon the facts from flying nuns from horror shows.
Nor do I see a point of letting civility get in the way of a good flame war. But for the moment lets digress.
In the context of this discussion culture has a technical meaning. Within the technical meaning subculture also has a meaning. The technical meaning of subculture is not changed because common usage calls it a culture.
To keep it a bit in context many believers talk about spiritual energy and psychic energy and all kinds of energies. In the real world of physics energy has a very well defined meaning. That clowns talk about spritual and psychic energies does not mean they have anything to do with energy as defined by physics. They are not energy in any defined sense.
Frankly I haven't had a good flame war in years and am likely off my game but if you want to have one, Lay on, McNun, and cursed by she or he who is not in American Horror this season who cries hold your duff.
Yes, I am an anal retentive asshole but it is my asshole.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
Mesoamerican refers only to those who are from Mexico to Panama, Meso, Greek, between, the Americas North and South. More commonly known examples are Aztecs and Mayans.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
The flaming nun must be at that time of month trying to make an issue of this trivia.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
{ A_Nony_Mouse wrote }
Never 100% sure all the time, Am I to understand this is what Nony's original point was all about ?? Some would say nitpicker; some would honestly appreciate the effort made.
p.s. -- O-K-a-y enough then.
- - - - - -
In the immortal words of Bureaucrat #1.0 from Futurama, “Technically correct is the best kind of correct.”
I know what mesoamericans means and what region it refers to, hence my reference to the OLMECS and TOLTECS.
The indigenous people of that region are commonly referred to as South American Indians.
http:// www.native-languages.org/south-american.htm
..and being insulted by a deformed baby who shits in its pants doesn't carry the weight that you might expect.
So now instead of valiantly defending the "proper definition" of a word ( like "culture" or "Indian" or "cool" ) you've flipped to the other side of the argument ? Make up your mind.
Oh yes, the irksomeness is terrible. I'm about to phone for an ambulance.
I never heard of mesoamerican until I actually heard of it, either. Should I be in awe of your reference ?
So the Brits beat the Maori to New Zealand ? I did not know that !
No, feel free to school me with your "proper definition" if you're still a supporter of that concept. You've confused me with your new willingness to defend alternate definitions based upon popular usage.
Political definitions ? Wouldn't anthropology be the correct source for "proper definitions" in this discussion?
OMG are you going to fling insults at me !
And what is the actual tipping point for when a sub-culture actually become a full-fledged culture. Population ? Political influence ? Electing their own Pope ?
Are they discussing physics ?
I'm sure you're very proud of your asshole. Good for you.
That is what triggered it. Obviously something else is eating at he/she/it. I have no idea what is going on.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
Anal retentive, remember?
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
The context of this discussion is veganism. It can rightly be referred to as a culture that is based upon a strong, sometimes fanatical, sense of ethics where vegans considers using animal products as abhorent ( remember Manageri and his long discussions about suffering, etc. ) and how meat eaters like us are worse than infidels. The Amish have their own culture based upon their view and lifestyle, for example and would also be analogous.
Nony made vague references that culture wars aren't "bloodless" ( I provided a link which clearly showed the term is associated with bloodless conflicts ) and yet Nony never actually defined his "proper definition" or "technical meaning" of culture other than it's probably bloody and its bigger than a subculture.
And speaking of "context" ...in the context of global population does that mean the much smaller United States of America is a subculture when compared to the countries of China or India which each have populations that exceed one billion people ?
Wow, I'm an American and I belong to a sub culture.
Technically correct ? Although language and linguistics exists as a field of study, it isn't like studying math or physics. There's more than one correct answer when citing a particular term or word and context should be enough ( except for Nony ) to enlighten the reader as to what the fuck is going on. The usage and even the definition of terms is never static or fixed. For instance using a dictionary as a source will offer multiple definitions for the word "culture". I've even provided a link with its multiple usages which clearly encompassed the way I used it when referring to vegans. If you don't like it then take it up with the publishers of the Miriam-Webster dictionary.
Again from another source http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/culture?s=t It references " youth culture" and "drug culture" ..."or any social group within it: yob culture." No "sub" prefix was added by the publishers. Coincidence ?
I haven't perverted the definition simply by citing vegans as a culture. If anyone went back to post #199 and read the Miriam-Webster entry I provided previously you can enlighten yourselves. You will also find the prefix "sub" to be lacking in all examples given.
Out of the mouth of ( deformed ) babes.
I may be a fool but I do not run errands.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
So much for your defense of "proper definitions", eh ? Major fail.
You say sense of ethnics defines this culture you imagine. And as I read the ethics it is based upon the idea of animal suffering. Yet the food fetish defined as vegan has existed all of the world. It also existed before the late 19th c. idea that animals could suffer was invented. There were veggieheads for millenia in India. They existed in ancient Egypt, Greece and Babylon all before and unrelated to the late 19th c. invention, recognition if you wish.
But you say all of those with this eating fetish are of the same culture even though only the recent western claims an ethical rationale.
If they are not the same culture then there are and were Indian Vegans, Greek vegans and a couple kinds of Egyptian vegans.
===
In regard to your icon
nice vibrator.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
And likewise, throughout recorded history a drug culture has existed all over the world in virtually every civilization
( dictionary entry referenced "drug culture" as example, post #219 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/culture?s=t ...read it for yourself lazy ass )
Some used drugs for spiritual enlightenment others purely for escapism. Whatever their differing motives they all took part in the same activity that defined them as druggies. So ?
Yes, brass knuckles are nice but they don't have a manual safety so you might be confused by their operation.
Oh, I'll change my avatar from time to time just so that you can continue to spew forth your pithy observations. Priceless !
Repeating the nonsense does not change the nonsense.
I was thinking of fisting actually.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
Everything has a price. I did like the flaming nun though it was so FXy.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
Thanks for the detailed and informative history of vegans from antiquity. I guess you do run errands after all, lol.
The "detail" of over riding significance you are neglecting is that Manageri represents veganism in the twenty first century. Oops !
It goes without saying that your very own Jew fetish has evolved from the culture of Martin Luther ( religious ) , to Hitler ( racial hygiene ) , to your present version of this Jew fetish.
As with the long histories of both veganism and anti-semitism, different paths to the same destination changes little or nothing regarding the final product.
Then your ass hole must be a wreck !
For some reason I refused to even look at this thread, but after reading the first page I skipped to the end.
1 - You can't live in this world with out supporting the death and torture of animals; unless you want to go live on an island and grow your own food, make your own shelter and learn to enjoy masturbation for passing the time.
2 - Any thing you use or do in this society is some how built from a foundation of meat eating. The roads you drive on, the gasoline you use, the oil, the tires, etc, etc, etc. You can't avoid it. No way. No how.
3 - I think it, the original post by Vastet, shows that random events can change the course of an entire civilization. Makes me wonder how or why our ancestors first at meat? Was it a dead animal and no fruit or nuts around? Some small family found the dead carcass of a cow and then started to eat specific parts which smelled good? They enjoyed it so much or it changed their brain in a way that they craved it? Then when they bumped in to another group who had no food they taught them to eat the meat. Next they were hunting out cows when ever they could find them?
Wonderful stuff!!!
I can only suggest you practice reading for comprehension as I included both modern Indian and the modern "ethical" version. There are others. Your issue is ALL kinds of veggieheads are the same culture. You did not specify any time frame. However as to 21st century there is still the religious variety in India and "ethical suffering" among others in the West. Perhaps you also need to learn to write so others can comprehend what you intend to communicate.
Even if limited to that one type, which is no place indicated in what you claimed, then his claim is against using any animal product on the "ethical" (read emotional) claim that collecting milk and eggs causes suffering. Seems to me the ovo-lacto veggieheads have no problem with raising animals. Not the same basis at all. It is a matter of time before I need to direct you to the veggiehead scene from Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
So now you tell me what this is all about. I do not see what crazy Christians like Luther has to do with the subject. Now do I see the relevence of the ritual/taboo, genital mutilating Yahweh cult members. Do you have a problem with putting both in barrels and banging hard? This is an atheist website. Judaism doesn't get nearly the hassle it deserves compared to other religions.
I do not see how you connect the ritual sacrifice cult with ethical considerations on animal suffering. Are you suggesting them as opposites? My sig does address Zionism which by definition requires murder and theft to succeed and always has. And that requirement has been in writing since Jabotinski who is considered the philosophical basis for the Likud party which currently rules Israel. It also maintains the tyrannical jewish military dictatorship over millions of non-Jews. I consider the deliberate and willful deprivation of human rights to Palestinians to be much worse than any animal suffering if that is what you mean. Sic Semper Tyrannis!
As to long histories, Hitler was a vegetarian and therefore of the same culture as the veggiehead you are defending. In fact both of them are of the same culture and Gandhi by your single culture claim.
And before you try the usual crap read Sand's Invention of the Jewish People and remember it was that Zionist invention that was adopted by the Nazis. Without it, conversion was the only option. And before getting to excited about that read up on the Transfer agreement, Ha'Avara, which is the collaboration of the Zionists with the Nazis. And be sure to throw a hissy fit.
I still like your fisting vibrator.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
What might that have to do with your girl friends?
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
It isn't a matter of finding something dead and trying to find a use for it until someone decides to take a bite. Lemurs are omnivorous and tree-dwelling. Except for us and a variety of gorilla all related monkies and apes are tree-dwelling full or part time and most will eat anything they can catch. In trees it is mostly eggs and grubs. Eggs of any degree of maturity and then hatchlings are included. It is normal. The only change is the variety of meat eating and for us dependence on it.
And if you remember trying to catch birds and squirrels as a kid you remember it didn't work. For that you needed to throw rocks or spears, in other words use tools to catch animals to eat. Also snares and nets and such but the point being tools expanded the available meat supply. Expanded from things that could not run away like eggs and grubs to things that couldn't run fast enough. That was a huge increase in available meat sources. Eggs and grubs are an occasional bonus to leaf and tuber eating. With tools you can add hunting to the previous gathering.
Once meat allows greater brain development you have a positive feedback loop as smarter people make better hunters. Once the brain can recognize animal tracks it has an adavantage no other animal ever had. That leading to more food would lead to a brain able to figure out how old the tracks are and which are most recent making more meat available. The smart you get the more meat you get.
And then the side benefit that meat allows maximum physical size which means stronger which means bigger game which means more meat.
Of course equilibrium sets in at some point such as bigger than necessary means hunting for the sake of hunting as happens with predators. Their size changes with the size of the prey over millions of years. The rules are different for social hunters like us and African lions and a lot more.
Google it. There is a lot of literature around this idea not just for people by animals and it can keep you off the street and out of trouble for days once you get started.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.
www.ussliberty.org
www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html
www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml
Perhaps the "others" are your favored "subcultures" that you prattled on about ? ( but which never found there way into any of the actual dictionary references I provided for you, lol ! )
Does that mean that Gandhi was also a member of the NSDAP ? I learn all kinds of new things from you.
Does anyone who isn't obsessed with this Jew fetish of yours actually spend all of their time memorizing this crap ? Why would I read any of this shit when you can't even bring yourself to read a single entry from an online dictionary that I even provided a link to ?
Of course you like it, it's probably the only thing left that can still stimulate your old man nerve endings.