Yeah, way. I mean, yahweh. If they all worshiped the original Canaannite war god, things would be so much easier. 

Yahweh or the highway was not how it was.

Canaanites are mythical creatures like Munchkins. It is not clear who started the myth of a war god. There were several competing chief gods were El of the Phoenicians and Amen of the Egyptians. And of course they do worship El as in Beth El and such. Then of course there was still Zeus from the Hellenic colony of Joppa the modern Jaffa. The Nabateans, like the Judeans, had a god/goddess pair.

There is no indication of any gods or worship in those caves. If one insists upon finding it then it can only be described as animistic as there are only pictures of animals. Human looking gods appears to have originated with the people who started the Aryan, aka Indo-European, language group. In fact it shows up in Egypt where upper Egypt with it Nubian influence is where the gods are almost always in animal form but in lower Egypt with the Aryan influence they are human with animal heads.

Other than having just about everything we know about the evolution wrong and not knowing the origin of the "convert or die" religion by force by the Hasmoneans not bad.

But as to oppression, Blacks can't change their skin color. Jews can change their religion. It was a free choice.

Isn't the worst thing the Palestinians did was to be Palestinians?

Look, you post some blatant nonsense and I correct it. Suddenly it is all back to who started it and implying no one should care. Why should the OWNERS of the land in what is now Israel care about their private property? That the color of law was used to steal their private property, the deeded ownership of real property, land, does not change the fact that it was stolen. Eastern Europeans stole the land. The owners want it back.

I fought the Cold War from the inside. I never missed the fact that the Russians were the same species. That did not stop me from developing better ways to kill them first. But frankly species never came into it.

I find it odd that an apparent defender of the eternal victims. Antisemitism has been going on for some two millenia since Josephus invented it. And still it is, poor us, we were holocausted.

The solution is quite simple. It is so obvious I do not see why you keep trying to avoid it. The lawful owners of the private property return and reclaim it. And then they have an election and vote the murderous, thieving zionist movement into the shitcan of history where it has always belonged. That is obviously the solution to everything.

But if that is too much for you to swallow at once at least agree the ruthless, jewish, military dictatorship over millions of non-Jews should end immediately. Is it too much to ask your agreement on that point?

German Jews who didn't de-convert or leave, freely chose to have their rights stripped away?

So we have a choice where we are born and what our parents sell us?

There is so much jewish propaganda on the subject, and of the Marxist style of ideological repetition that it is incredibly important to use the proper terminology at all times. The subject cannot be discussed without sticking to correct terminology.

Then only read before bedtime.

Absent that the world should treat these thieving tyrants the same it treated Mlisevic and Saddam Hussein, Ghaddfy, Pol Pot and others of their ilk. In this case it would be the dictator Netanyahu.

The surest way to get dead in this world for uncountable reasons is being stupid.

One of the ways of being stupid is thinking and behaving as though the world gives a damn about our ideas of should and should not.

If you are unaware of the subject matter you don't have standing to offer an opinion nor should you expect me to educate you.

Should you look into the subject you should also look into the requirement for citizenship in Israel as the implementation of the same concept with quite similar rules. Meaning of course you cannot like one and dislike the other as there is no substantive difference between the two. Please no jewish propaganda on the subject unless it has been exposed less than 100 times.

I doubt you missed the point.

As to Israel my point was simply that as there are no complainants about loss of German citizenship why even raise the issue? It is a modestly obscure point. How did you even hear of it?

Any way should you actually read the Weimar constitution go directly to the emergency powers section. That was implemented immediately after the Reichstag fire. All subsequent legislation was done pursuant to those emergency powers.

You will need a fairly experienced legal mind and knowledge of the German legal system at the time to find a problem with legislation pursuant to those powers. That a law is unconstitutional does not makes actions under the law a crime.

And as to the time frame citizenship only became an inalienable right in the US around 1977 or so. Prior to that voting in a foreign election meant automatic loss of citizenship and dual citizenship was not recognized by the US. One had to choose.

You join half the people on the forum. lol.

Excuse me sir but you must have me confused with someone who gives a shit.

This leads us to the early years where the apologists were trying to convince everyone their religion was just like everyone elses. If you read the apologies themselves, NOT the selective quotes, it is fairly clear that is what they were doing. And only fairly clear because things were not written the way they are today. Being familiar with how people wrote is another odd little thing you need to spend time in hell learning.

Take for example the gospels. It these were being written today the only opening lines would be something like "This is the story of the life of our risen Lord, the Son of God" so that one sees each event as an indication. Each event would have some words relating it to the opening lines. Think of a biography of Washington or Lincoln.

Instead it is told like a novel or a story with a punchline. After all this, guess what? He resurected! Same as the tales of Heracles, Isis and Osiris, Adonis and others. The Galilean, aka Christian, claims were intended to be like the other suffered, died and returned to life gods.

And this is where the break comes in. They were called Galileans and their opposition was called Judeans, aka Jews. That aka comes directly from Flavius Josephus so the source is credible and contemporary. Galileans went unmentioned by him save to recite they were conquered by the Judeans and forced to convert to the Judean cult practices including circumcision.

Anyway they were declaring their beliefs the same as Roman beliefs just with different characters. Notice in the apologies and rationalizations there is no mention of anything Judean or old testament. There was son of god not son of Yahweh. I reading this stuff you have to learn to pay attention to what is not there. Their Christ, not Jesus, was just another son of a god like Perseus for example.

The theology of this Christ being a god himself or god and man or adopted son or just a man, man with god spirit and who knows how many other variants is still not settled but the arguments still exist for the amusement of atheists everywhere.

For all the popular interest the whole of the DSS appears deliberatedly mired in academia such that one has to take the introductory courses to understand anything. Quite odd after so many years. They are written in several languages. I was interested in simply which books in which languages. I could not find it. Everything went back to the original letter/number designations. And even then no language listing by those designations. I think I have managed to collect enough listing to reorganize then into names and languages and a few other things but I have yet to be bored enough to tackle it.

Rotsa Ruck!

Since I know you don't respect me, you're being either sarcastic or dishonest by calling me "sir".

Firstly, responding to my statement of "Being an idiot should not..." with "One of the ways of being stupid is thinking and behaving as though the world gives a damn about our ideas of should and should not." means you think my statement is evidence I'm stupid.

Secondly, responding to my statement of "I'll look back through the Weimar Constitution..." with "Should you actually read the Weimar Constitution..." means you think my statement was a lie. Not that you care, but I had read through almost all of Section II (titled something like "The Rights and Duties of a German Citizen" ) before I made my statement about looking back.

I dislike bickering but lets give it a try.

The being an idiot had the emphasis on the SHOULD NOT that you brought up. I see no reason to retreat from my position that dealing with the world in terms of what should be is not rational.

Congrats on actually reading it however I have no idea why you would think that topic would apply to who has citizenship. I can only plead my attention was on the (disrespectful?)

1) You appear to be confusing respect for the person with respect for the opinions of a person.

2) You appear to think posting in public should not encounter others disagreeing with what is posted.

I am almost with you on that. The only thing that is stopping me is that there ARE enough secular people in both camps, not enough, but enough to me that the collateral damage would not be worth it to me.  In a utopia solution I'd put a nuke in the center of both populations and say, "The next person, from either side that throws another punch both of you are going to be fucking vaporized".

Noony is still stupidly saying "he started it" then hypocritically points out ancient history claiming that this current shit is not about ancient history, when without ancient history would not be happening now. Then stupidly forgets that "poor me" has a shelf life, and ignores that I also say to Israel the "poor me crap" is also wearing thin with me.

Do the assholes on both sides give one fuck about the rest of the world? It seems like they dont. I wouldn't give one fuck about an all out war between them if it didn't drag the rest of the world into it. But it will and since I live here too, I do give a damn.