Donald Trump, and his fat bloated ego....... You know I meant Buddha.

Brian37 wrote:

It is asshole,when an apple and a banana  are both fruit. Yea dickead, I used the wrong word, so sue me. You are a fucking moron becuase if I had the power to delete this thread, you'd stupidly accuse me of trying to cover up my mistake. Too stupid to see that by leaving it up EVERYONE gets to learn from my mistake.

When the wrong word you use is central to your point, it is kinda important. 

 

Quote:

It still does not change that there was no religion 200,000 years ago.

You really shouldn't talk about history. Every single fucking time you are absolutely wrong. There is pretty strong evidence that neanderthals and homo heidelbergensis had burial practices that were likely religious based. The MOST you can say is that we don't know for sure if religion existed 200,000 years ago. Though it is quite possible that it existed 400,000 years ago. It is likely that religion was born the instant a being was capable of asking the question in their head "What am I?"

 

Quote:

And only an idiot thinks religions or god/s will be rememberd after our species goes extinct.

Considering we remember the religions of our ancestors, only an idiot would think that when our species goes extinct that some other intelligent species isn't eventually going to figure out the basics of our religious beliefs, short of the complete destruction of our planet.

 

Quote:

 

 But fuck you if you think somehow blunt language or cuss words equates to oppression itself.

You couldn't oppress an ant. 

 

Quote:

Now, if you want to claim that is not what you are accusing me of, go ahead.

It isn't a claim, it is a fact. Vastet has accused you of being a complete fucking idiot. He has never accused you of oppressing anyone or anything. I'm pretty sure he would agree with my assessment that you would be a complete failure at oppressing anything. 

 

Quote:

If you do that, then that means I am not doing anything wrong. 

Being a complete fucking idiot is wrong. Lying is wrong. And being wrong is wrong by definition.  

 

 

 

http://www.rationalresponders.com/privatemsg/inbox From: Beyond Saving To: Brian37 Subject: Football! Date: September 17, 2015 - 12:42pm

Jets vs skins on the 18th in jersey. I have a line on a couple of tickets, are you interested?

It is asshole,when an apple and a banana  are both fruit.

Donald Trump, and his fat bloated ego....... You know I meant Buddha.

Yes politics, religion and business models ARE all about resources. Now you stupidly equate resources to money and material. Resources can be emotional support like love, companionship. Socialising by surrounding yourself with like minded people is a resource. If it were just about material and money, we wouldn't need other humans. If you know what "Human resources" means in business. 

When we are born, we cry or smile to get attention from our parents. As we grow our language gets more complex. We use that language to make the physical act of conveying information. It can convey patterns we think work in the form of politics, religon or business. But those physical acts are still the same thing. An attempt to create social order. Now please don't stupidly keep repeating that they are different. YES THEY ARE DIFFERENT, so stop making arguments I am not making. It is like arguing Ford and Chevy and Toyota in a NASCAR race are not different cars. Even in a NASCAR race those races have teams that overlap. Just like politics cant avoid investment in the global market. Just like religon will always make attempts to create social order in public policiy. 

The track we are on is called life. Our teams overlap one car is politics, another is religion, and another business, but it is all the same track. Those things cannot avoid overlap. And all those things require income to keep up. But the reality in evoluton is those things are exclusively human invented. Prior to our species, the "income" in other mamals and primates was grouping, and the ability to gain access to food and to avoid danger. 

The point is long before humans concocted boarders, created money, or religion, we still had resources, we would not have evolved without them. No life would have without them. But food and shelter are not the only resources. Socializing is a resource. Once you understand that, you will understand why the priority overlap are food and shelter and the socializing in the form of labels humans concoct needs to be put on the back burner and replaced with the pragmatic socilzing of understanding as a priority that we are all social animals and not a separate species.

So again, you are not wrong in saying they are different. BUT IN CONTEXT. The are differnet types of attempts to create social order and do overlap. But all those different attempts at social order still ride on the same track humans call life. The problem is that humans outside those who do accept evolution, fail to see that those constructs did not exist in the past and will not exist when our species goes extinct. See Sagans Pale Blue Dot speech.

For example, repeatedly accusing iwbiek of being a buddhist and Che supporter.