American mass shootings aren't even news. They're just regular occurrences.

"As for the year to date, the Washington Post reports that there have been 335 days so far in 2015 – and in that time, there have been 355 mass shootings in the United States. In fact, there was a shooting in Savannah this morning that left one person dead and three others injured.
 
In other words, the deadly violence in San Bernardino is the second mass shooting today."

 http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/latest-mass-shooting-unfolds-southern-california

Yes they are, and it is because of one industry and the NRA lobby scaring the crap out of object worshipers to keep and grow a flooded gun market. Gun worshipers want to protect guns like Isis will kill over the Koran. This isn't about political/religious or mere whack job. These guys just like Roof, and and the PP shooter and the Va Reporter shooter had easy access to guns. 

 Do we ever hear about mass shootings at gun ranges?  If not, why not?

Not the point, having a gun anywhere does not insure safety. Not a body count issue.

Humn death can happen at a shooting range. http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/03/justice/texas-sniper-killed/ Then there was the girl who killed her instructor with the uzi. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/09/02/girl-who-accidentally-shot-her-instructor-with-an-uzi-said-the-gun-w... But I guess if you have a permit, then meh, who give a fuck https://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2015/12/04/Delivery-driver-accidentally-shot-by-customer-s-gun.html Wait, maybe if you have some police training. http://www.11alive.com/story/news/local/2015/08/31/dekalb-co-police-officer-shot/71492826/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am-Qdx6vky0 "trained" officers injure 9 bystanders http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/25/justice/new-york-empire-state-shooting/ Lets forget the Va Tech shooter had no record. And lets forget the SB shooters also had no record. Now, maybe the fact is most people who think they can handle a gun over estimate their abilities. If trained people can injure themselves, then odds are those with even less training over estimate their abilities. The fact remains that no matter how the gun is obtained, either legally or illegally, it still remains even without mass shootings, you are STILL more likely to injure yourself or someone you are familiar with in the home/neighorhood. The issue isn't about rights, the issue is VOLUME made and ease of access. If everyone wants guns kept out of he wrong hands, then people need to think about it not being as simple as "I have no record" and "I can hit my target". Hitting a target at a range is not the same as hitting a target under stressful traumatic situations.

You not liking my offerings does not mean the status qoe is acceptable. I have offered them, you simply don't like them, becuase you have the same mentality Isis does about the Koran, you treat a gun as if it is a living human instead of an object. 

1. THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT MEAN "TAKE ALL GUNS AWAY"

2. Re read until you get that through your parianoid skull.

3. Humans have rights, but guns are not living humans. Just like you can drive a car on a public road, but you cant drive a 5 lane wide monster truck on a public road, and you cant legally speed 100mph in a school zone. Safety regulations do not make something an outright ban. Just like you cant sell porn to kids. Just like you cant sell beer to minors.

4. "Background checks don't work", yep I agree, because they are too quick and the person is not mentally evaluated before they get one, yet police and military are required to. Mandatory psych evalutation. And training, not just the ability to hit a target, but testing to see if the potential owner can hit the right target under stress. 7 day wating period and limit on guns in householed. Proof of safety/anti theft in the house. 

6. Mandatory review of licence periodically. 

5. Bans on spray weapons and large clips. "re read #1," Know the difference between wants and needs. I get that people want them. But if you cant hit a deer, or defend yoruself with a limited clip, then basically all you are saying is you like them.

6. Ban on online sales, close gun show loophole.

7. Tracable ammo, limits on ammo.

8. Move to making smart guns. If nobody wants their gun used unauthorized then this is a benifit to the owner.

9. Re read #1.

Dont scream about keeping guns out of the wrong hands, we both agree on that, then bitch about any hint of regulation. The reason we cant do anything affectively is because of our country's attitude towards guns. That is the biggest problem. Nothing is going to change until more people realize that it isn't as simple as "I have no record" and "I can hit my target" or "I have no ill intent, I am responsible". 

The issue has been and still is the sheer number we make, our flooded market and ease of getting them, both legally and illegally. 

Oh and realated to that, invest in mental health care, universal health care, livable wages for workers,  lower cost of living ratio between the top and bottom. Cheaper and or free higher education. Oh and that too does not say "End the private sector".

Now once again I offered up my solutions. You have no excuse once again. Now, will I get all of that, certainly not with the paranoid right, but "do nothing" and "me me me me" and "other bad shit happens so do nothing about this" isn't going to cut it. 

7. 

 I'd even bet the recent biker bar shooting where 9 people died had a mix of both legal and illegal guns. But right now everyone has lawyered up but once the trials start will be interesting to know the legality of all the guns fired in that testosterone bullshit fake patriot "rebel" "baddass" crap.

 Guns, exciting and new, buy some more, their  killing you. And Guns, worshipers ignore, let them spray, kill some more. THE GUN BOAT, soon will be making another run, THE GUN BOAT, promises death for everyone, set course for adventure a pretend bad ass, and guns, wont hurt anymore, in their delusional world, if we just make some more. WELCOME ABOARD IT'S GUNS GUNS GUNS!

fireams are taken away from those that want them, mentally ill or not---explosives is a more efecient way to get it done. They'll migrate from one to the next.

So which of your proposed laws WOULD have kept the pistol out of that man's hands? He went through a background check, had no record of mental illness, had the gun for three months, so a 7 day wait does nothing. He had a concealed carry meaning that he did have to pass a safety test. The gun was a simple pistol, nothing fancy. And he apparently only had the one gun. So what is your solution? Because nothing you mentioned so far would have prevented this shooting either.

Brian wants to lock everyone up in a padded room by themselves so noone can hurt him. waa waa mommy he doesn't like me waa waa

A nut who goes out and starts shooting everyone they can is rather different from a gangbanger who shoots at a particular target and 3 innocent bystanders are injured by stray bullets in terms of what precations would be best to prevent them. Our country has a huge gang problem. Even were that solved somehow, it isn't going to solve the nut who snaps and shoots everyone at work and vice versa. So from a practical standpoint, it doesn't make sense to conflate the two when looking for solutions.