Major flaw in Theory of Relativity
Offline Relativity of simultaneity shows flaw when a third simultaneous even is introduced in the "Ladder Paradox" thought experiment.
Link to the Wikipedia page, treating the ladder paradox - click HERE to read.
Please study the content from the above link, and refer to it when examining the problem presented by me.
For better understanding I'll use the same graphics, modified for the purpose of the problem.
To question the length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity I introduce a third simultaneous event in the ladder paradox problem.
How? Simply, by attaching a rod to each door, which are welded perpendicularly on the inside of the doors, in a way that the rod tips touch when both the doors are closed. (See the red attached arms on the graphics)
Think of this touching event as verification of the simultaneity - touching verifies simultaneity, no touching - no simultaneity. Obviously this event will be absent in the ladder reference frame, since the doors in that frame are not closing simultaneously. Missing event in one of the reference frames is against the law of physics, which automatically puts Einstein's Theory of Relativity in the dustbin. (Don't laugh. Think.)
Graphics:
1. left hand side - garage reference frame with simultaneously closing doors. Touching event is present on the third graphic from the top.
2. right hand side - ladder reference frame with non simultaneously closing doors. Touching event is missing.
Why do I present this problem in your forums?
Just to show, how authorities create unbreakable walls and form mind obedience.
You are terrified by the idea of Einstein being wrong in the core of his theory, eh?
No, you are not. You cannot even allow such a thought in your obedient minds.
You think that I'm crazy, and that solves all your problems with all your wrong perceptions of the world.
- Login to post comments
Did you include yourself as an element or event within the problem. In working the problem would one make themself an event that must be considered along with the other events.
My brain must be shorted . I'm having a problem with the problem. I think I need an animation to see this. Or, my cognatives aren't what they were in the past. In Wikipedia they present the same, but with a difference. They don't have touching rods on the doors.
The only possible thing the world needs saving from are those running it.
https://sites.google.com/site/oldseers
Knowledge trumps faith and I'm not a Theist
Lies are nothing more then falsehoods searching for the truth
Two simultaneously closing doors are two simultaneous events. (We are interested in the events, not in the doors)
Two rods touching their tips at the same time with the doors closing, is third simultaneous event.
I think that this explanation is quite understandable. It is shown on the left side graphic, third image.
It does depend on the Frame of Reference.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simultaneity
"Simultaneity is the property of two events happening at the same time in a frame of reference. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, simultaneity is not an absolute property between events; what is simultaneous in one frame of reference will not necessarily be simultaneous in another. "
Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen
More proof you know shit about relativity. You can't even begin to appreciate how off you are.
Every time you post you make a fool of yourself.
You have no clue about any science at all. So you're in no position to make such a claim.
No shit sherlock. You think the dimensions of the ladder and garage actually change, but they don't. They only appear to, and only from objects relative to them. Get that through your thick skull right now.
You're a complete buffoon. You have no method capable of taking measurements of your dumb ass experiment yet claim it proves relativity is bs yet you say relativity is about measurements. I'm betting you don't have the slightest idea that you are literally retarded.
News flash retard: you will never measure the ladder as being completely in the garage because it is never completely in the garage. Period.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
That's not dependency. That's relativity
Relativity is absolutely dependant on something being relative. In other words, a second frame of reference.
EXC finally gets something right and it's wasted on this idiot.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
That does it, I'm convined, Allah is the one true god. Oh that's right you stupidly think you are the only one who tries to incorporate science to point to your pet god and pet book. Hate to burst your bubble, but like I said previously, this tactic is used by followers of every major religon worldwide.
http://www.islamreligion.com/category/34/scientific-miracles-of-holy-quran/
Jews also think science matches their religion.
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/71692/jewish/How-Scientific-is-Torah.htm
And Hindus
http://hinduismfacts.org/hindu-science/
The Dali Lama thinks Buddhism fits in well with science too.
http://www.dalailama.com/messages/buddhism/science-at-the-crossroads
So when any religion cant debunk science they resort to retrofitting it after the fact to get it to point to their clubs. So again, get in line, take a number.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
What the f*ck is wrong with you guys in this forums.
Where did I even imply that the presented problem has anything to do with god, God, Allah, Vishnu or any other god you don't believe in?
Is this kind of tactics to chase away people that are threatening your believes?
Don't waste time attempting to communicate with Brian37. You'd have more luck with a wall. He's in the running for dumbest member of this site through all its history.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
That is circular reasoning.
Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen
Brian posts two messages about dead celebrities at the same time. Brian is moving at the speed of light and from his point of view the messages were posted at the same time.
To the observer, the messages arrive at different times and they think "What the fuck does this person do all day long? Fish for deaths of public icons?"
The point of the experiment isn't if Brian actually posted messages at the same time. The point would be that it is awfully weird that he always seems to post messages about dead celebrities before any one else.
i don't think it's weird at all, because i don't think anyone else was going to post it, considering every major search engine's homepage, social media, and pretty much every online news outlet took care of that for us.
"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson
Shall we revive this topic? (click the link for recalling what it was about)
You're still retarded and you still know nothing about relativity. Nothing to see, move along.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
I see... dead forum.
So much for the rationality.
Says a retard who doesn't have ANY fucking clue about ANYTHING. Btw I love how you got owned in the comments at your link just as much as you got owned here. Super cute.
Don't let the door hit your dumb ass on the way out.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
The only thing that is dead in this fourm is your tired God of the gaps dodge.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
The only thing that is dead in this fourm is your tired God of the gaps dodge.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
Again the theist Brian37 says absolutely nothing relevant as he again attempts to turn this into a religious discussion. There's no god of gaps here. It's a fundamental failure to comprehend relativity nothing more nothing less.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Yeah, stinkingly dead.
Yeah your brain is definitely dead and stinking...
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.