Star Trek: Harry Mudd
Posted on: March 31, 2017 - 1:55pm
Star Trek: Harry Mudd
For those who are Star Trek fans
http://io9.gizmodo.com/rainn-wilson-is-going-to-bring-harry-mudd-to-star-trek-1793897688
- Login to post comments
And here I thought it couldn't get worse...
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the original episode metaphor about hubris and narcissism? Is your objection to the character comming back, or the actor trying to portray the original character? Just curious, never really got into the original series, but I do remember that episode. Harry gets duplicated right?
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
There were two episodes, and they both sucked. The character was ridiculous to the point of cartoony.
No, Harry didn't get duplicated. The second episode had him kinda but not really in charge of a bunch of androids that were defeated by mere illogical and irrational activity by the Enterprise crew. They all overheated due to basic logical conundrums, which logically prevented them from ever existing in the first place. Stupid episode.
The first one at least had some depth to the story. But it was still stupid.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
You shouldn't take the original series seriously.
I don't. There are still, however, some original episodes that were great and others that were shit. The Mudd episodes were easily in the shit pile.
That they are even considering introducing Mudd tells me that they aren't taking Discovery seriously. Which is... annoying.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
I agree. Some were total shit. I watch them on occasion and laugh at the mistakes and errors. Some of them are actually really good episodes.