Two questions for Christians
Can God make a rock so big that he can't lift it?
Could god have changed his plan for our existence before setting it into motion without affecting our free will?
Answering no to either shows us that god is not all powerful. Answering yes to the first one shows us that he's not all powerful. Answering yes to the second one shows us that God must want certain people to exist to convince others of his nonexistence.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
- Login to post comments
Then they shouldn't be calling it "Rational Responders", should they?
Though it's been a while, I've had very good discussions at www.Theologyweb.com . I will try that forum, though.
True, but they should either change it or make a specific forum for friendly discussion if they really want to change believers' minds. No rational believer is going to see their behavior and think, "hmmm...these guys make a lot of sense".
I'll do that. I think you're right in saying that things aren't going to change here, though if anyone here is interested in talking to me without using insults, twisting of words, or other forms of dishonesty, feel free to visit my web site, www.KingDavid8.com and contact me through it.
Bye, everyone. I'm gone.
David
Well, the link to the Britney Spears is dead site was funny.
There's no "dishonesty" at your "Magical Castle?" (check out his link ppl) Or is the "Magic Castle" just twisting words?
Uh-oh... I've got a feeling we'll see more posts from David. I've seen acts like this before.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
When I read here that you had admitted that you guys had lost the contest but were deleting the posts, I went looking for the contest thread on your website. What I found was your comment (my emphasis):
http://www.rationalresponders.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=640
"CLARIFICATION FOR PRIZE 2 IS COMING, AND NO FURTHER ENTRIES WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLARIFICATIONS COME. ANY ENTRIES WILL BE DELETED UNTIL CLARIFICATION COMES"
I checked the Internet cache, and indeed confirmed that posts were missing. I can't find any comment by you that you were moving posts, only deleting. I'm glad to see the missing posts, but there is nothing on the original thread to say where the posts were moved to. Can you add a note to the original thread to that effect? Anyone reading the original thread would still believe that you guys hadn't already lost the contest. Shouldn't that at least be in there?
Sapient, why did you delete the posts in the first place? I can see no reason for it, other than to save embarrassment. You have to admit that it does look suspicious. Why (1) move posts at all, and then (2) not note where the deleted ones are?
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
That refers to only new posts, not anything that was already posted. Nobody submitted new entries and therefore nothing needed to be deleted.
I'll remove the info from prize 2 from the first post right now.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
But I checked the google cache, and posts were indeed deleted.
Why delete them in the first place?
You don't need to remove anything. How about just restoring all the original posts?
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
No posts were deleted, they were moved.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
I moved posts twice. Last time I moved about 5, today about 7 more.
The first time they were moved because it was peanut gallery and not merely submissions and examination of submissions (or refute/rebuttal).
Today(the second time) the remaining posts were moved because I closed the second contest officially.
I don't really alert anyone to moved posts. Just ask first next time, which is exactly what the Cadre blogger should've done.
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
Actually, there was. :roll:
And what was that song? Na-na-na-na hey, hey, hey - goodbye!
Yeah, no shit. Buh bye now. Buh bye.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
What a coward. What a fool. Now he'll go spreading nonsense elsewhere. *Sigh*. You never can win, can you? No matter how logical and reasonable and honest you are, they always do the same. Run. And make excuses, while they're at it. Damn.
Wilson: "We were afraid that if you found out you solved a case with absolutely no medical evidence you'd think you were God." House: "God doesn't limp."
??? I'm not sure what happened here. How did Sapient's comments end up under my name? I'll try to recreate the post.
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
Damn it! I did it again. I hit "edit" instead of "quote" when responding to you. As a mod the buttons are next to each other. Sorry about that.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
OK. I have to ask: what happened to the comment in the opening post in the competition thread? It used to have the following (my emphasis):
http://rationalresponders.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=640
___________________________
PRIZE 2: Inevitably when we ask for contemporary evidence of Jesus Christ, some unintellectual spouts off... "You'd have to be a fool to ignore the thousands of writings, evidences, blah blah blah." Yet, none of the evidences provided arise from the lifetime of Jesus. People actually want us to believe a man walked on water, rose from the dead, yada yada yada, and NOBODY wrote it down! Give us a break! However... we are not above being wrong. So, with that in mind. We are offering a $100 reward and an appearance on our radio show where we will admit we we're wrong to the person who can set a precedent that other important historical figures exist without contemporary evidence. Provide us with the names of five important historical figures that were not written about until at least 25 years after they died (like Jesus). Keep in mind, if you do this you haven't proved Jesus existed, merely a good precedent.
To sum up once again, provide us with the names of five important historical figures that nobody wrote about until 25 years after afforementioned historical figure died. If you can do this you have set a precedent that other historical figures exist without contemporary proof.
AWARD FOR SETTING PRECEDENT: $100 and appearance on our show when we put our foots in our mouths.
___________________________
Editting the opening post in a thread after the thread had reached at least its second page is not good. Was the above moved elsewhere?
Note: I've kept a copy of this post, in case it disappears again.
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
Actually I deleted the "Prize 2" info from the first post when I moved all of the other Prize 2 stuff out of that thread, and probably should've kept it. I'll add the wording to the peanut gallery thread.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Was there? Why was it removed then? There is no link in the original thread now. http://rationalresponders.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=640
Anyone who had posted in the original thread would see that their posts had disappeared, with no indication of why and where the posts had gone.
"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into." -- Author unknown
It's the responsibility of the poster to ask or find it, before assuming they are certain they know what happened to it. We move posts all the time, we rarely tell anyone.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Sorry to hear that. I actually enjoyed our little discussions, and I've meant to get back to you for about a week now (pressing issues here), although you were more than just a little disingenious at times. Best of wishes, mate, ~Atheist_Scathe