Part of the "Bible is God's Word" thinking also states that there can be no additions to it. It is essentially complete. Basically, it is not only what God wants us to know, but also all that we are going to be told.

How does a INFINITE God commiunicate a 'infinite concept' to a finite being?

He cant communicate at all. This is what I wrote in the essay called The Matter/Information Conjecture, where i said:

We measure sentience in a unit called SQ or sentience quotient based on efficiency of sentience measured in calculations/s relative to mass of calculating unit. (In humans this is chemical neurotransmissions per neuron over mass of neuron). In this way, we can calculate the sentience of anything. God is described as maximally intelligent, the ultimate entity? What does this mean? There are constraints on this placed by the Law of conservation of energy. If God is the ultimate sentience, then this entity would harness all the energy in the universe with the maximum efficiently (defined as the minimum energy required for one bit of information). The upper limit given to us is 50. An SQ of 50. Humans have an SQ of roughly 13. This scale, by the way, is logarithmic, not linear. Such is the vast difference in speed perception, computational rates and intelligence that any meaningful attempt God made to communicate with us would be totally impossible, therefore making notions like Revelation and divine prophecy flat out impossible.

And of course, if an SQ 50 entity existed, we would not exist because this entity would harness the entire universe. Let me go into the impossibility of communication in more detail. The scale proceeds in Orders of Magnitude. Imagine that I sat down next to a potted plant and attempted to explain to it how the Boltzmann equations regarding ideal gas laws relate to quantum dynamics. Is this absurd? A potted plant has an SQ of 1. This means that ours outclasses it by 13 Orders of Magnitude. The God entity, presumably to fit the definition, would outclass ours by something like 40 Orders of magnitude. This is somewhat equivalent of....well, nothing really. The magnitude of absurdity is so high that there is no analogy to do it justice. I suppose one could imagine giving this lecture to an oxygen molecule to gain some appreciation of it.

We could conclude God is not infinte. Sorry, that's impossible. , such a structure could exist at all without breaking the laws of thermodynamics. It could not sustain itself (there would be no free energy drive to generate the information gradient. Think of it like a skyscraper which is growing taller. Eventually, it will just collapse). 

If the Sentience of the God entity outclassed ours by the given forty orders of magnitude, that is also expressed as 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times in computational power speed. Have you ever tried communicating with your garden shrubs? No? Good. People will think you're insane. This is the same principle except a lot worse, as in exactly 10^37 times worse. 

OK Assume God (in other words, atheists BUG OFF, I am going to answer the post and ignore whatever you say.)

First off, the Bible never claims anywhere to be a full exposition of all that is God, so the Bible agrees with your conclusion.

Secondly, I will agree that the present Bible has been translated and worked on by hands that were not divinely inspired. The question I am adressing is not wheter or not the present scripture is 100% God Breathed, but rather if the original was. 

1. God is infinite

2. Human language is finite

3. Therefore God's power cannot be limited by human language in expressing Himself or his thoughts.

You forget that God being Omnipotent also means that He literally controlls what a person thinks. So he could take an imperfect wording in an imperfect scripture, and refine it between the reading and the comprehension into a perfect idea. What you are trying to do here litterally boils down to trying to put God in a box. 

You can't dismiss this one. Here's an artificial example. Let's say some strange culture somewhare has an alphabet with two symbols A and B. Now they don't talk a lot and so far have words with only one or two letters. So their entire vocabulary only consists of the words A, B, AA, AB, BA and BB. Each word represents a single concept A= God, B=Satan, AA= Heaven, AB= Hell, BA= Man, and BB= Woman. This is a finite set of symbols and it represents a finite set of concepts. The expressiveness of this set of symbols is restricted to the point where you CAN'T express and idea like "BA and BB that follow A go to AA, BA and BB the follow B go to AB. The symbol set has no representation for follow, go, to, and, and that. 

With some additional work, this can be extended to any finite symbol set. The bible is a finite symbol set and so has a limit to its expressiveness.

I get what point you're trying to convey, wavefreak, and I think it's a good point to be making. Unfortunately I think it will take alot of effort and testing to make it stand up to the considerable opposition you will get from the people you will try to convince. Perhaps if you tried to simplify it down to just a couple of sentences it would be easier for people to digest, and harder to rebuke. I'm not too hot on this sort of stuff but I'm sure if you ask nicely enough there will be plenty of people here to help you come up with a good way of presenting the argument. Good luck!

Yeah. It's not a 5 minute project. I've been twiddling this in my mind for years. Every once in awhile I wonder if I could formalize it. I'm patient enough to twiddle with it for a few more years. This seems like a good place to sharpen it up. As for the resistance I meet, I tend to not care too much. I can sleep just fine at night. 

This approach would require those that deify the bible to make the logical connection. I doubt that connection will be made without making it an explicit argument. Can you direct me to some resources on linguistic determinism?