Oh my goodness.

This guy is as bad as that lab-coat-wearing Christian chemist on YouTube who lives in Mexico.

Yes it can...

 What do they mean by "life"? Are they referring to the first proto-biological polymers, or the arisal of the first cell-machinery based organisms? Regardless of how it began, one thing is very obvious. Life began in the ocean, and water has left a permanent stamp on our biology. 

Quick chemistry less. Why does life need oxygen, children, or most of it, anyway? Mostly because of late matabolic processes, one in particular requires oxygen: Oxidative Phosphorylation. When we think of the word Oxidation, we think of adding oxygen. But that is not true, in chemistry, oxidation refers explicitly to the loss of electrons, and conversely, reduction is the gain of electrons. It is the high energy electrons generated by the Krebs Cycle which drives the synthesis of a molecule which is universal to life, because it drives the vast majority of reactions, Adenosine Triphosphate. The only real reason Oxygen gas is required in this step is to accept the electrons so that it bonds with a free proton (which are always in the cytoplasm) to form water. 

That is why that process entails the use of molecular oxygen, and is the only near-universal metabolic process explicitly unable to function without it. Oxidative phosphorylation comes after the NADH ( Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Diphosphate) from one turn of the Krebs Cycle is oxidized to donate high energy electrons which are passed along the electron transport chain in the inner membrane of a tiny organelle inside nearly all protozoa, fungi, animal and plant cells, the mitochondria.

But for the vast majority of life's history, Oxidative phosphorylation did not exist, only for the last 1.5 billion years. the dominant process is a much older, much more primordial process that still exists today, glycolysis and the other process fermentation. Both of these produce energy in the form of ATP and NADH, but they do not require any oxygen at all to function, in fact, to primordial bacteria, oxygen is specifically lethal, and anyone who actually knows about evolution would know this.

Maybe at around 18,000 atmospheres. Some nagging feelings (rolls eyes) tells me I don't think that could happen on Earth, unless God put it in the microwave. Here (In reality, as opposed to creationists, who all live in Imaginationalnd taking drugs) there are these Pesky laws of physiscs which say that pressure is equal to the amount of force applied divided by the area over which it is applied.

They also forgot the potential for life to have evolved on underwater vents, where organisms would have gotten energy from the primordial interal heat of Earth instead of the sun, far away from whatever crazy shit was going on in the atmosphere.

Yes, the lithotrophes. Its fascinating that an entire ecosystem has evolved down near the hydrothermal vents which requires no support at all. Its the only ecosystem which does not depend on plant life. If plant life died, consequently all life on Earth would die except the lithotrophes. Apart from plants, they are the only other ecosystem which does not rely on feeding off organic material, like we do. They get their nutrients from minerals and metals, and use sulfer in their metabolic processes, which gives them a fascinating yellow glow. Down in the deep sea hydrothermal vents, often deep yellow patches can be found miles underwater. 

It's the classic It's Too Complicated So God Must Have Done It Argument for creationism. Because it's much easier to assume that God did it, rather than take a course on microbiology and read about the Krebs Cycle.

This argument is often used along with the Time-Limit on Scientific Discovery Argument, the one that says if science hasn't figured something out yet, then God must have done it.