I've heard it all too often, "What do you believe in?"  "Do you believe in god?"  "Would you stand up for what you believe?"  I think it is utter nonsence to simply fight for what you believe in, to fight for what is only temporary and ever changing seems pointless.  I would rather say that I fight for the right to freely inquire, to learn, to grow.  Also, it's not that I do or do not 'believe in' god, I simply have no evidence to conclude there is one.  It is this ridgidity of thought that is responcible for the many terms that have spawned such as "Agnostic" or "Weak/Strong Atheist".

 The abuse of 'belief' seems to be created by the need for absolute certainty, and I find those who fight for 'belief' rather arrogant.  I respect those who have invested thought into what they hold to be plausable, such as Richard Dawkins.  I loved his statement about being as much an agnostic towards god as he is an agnostic towards a tea pot around saturn.

 So what do I 'believe' in?  I believe that knowledge is ever expanding and fertile,  apart from that one would have to actually talk to me, it's hard to frame it all in sound bites