I think we have a few versions of it on our site:

Here's mine:

http://www.rationalresponders.com/pascals_wager

Here is another:

http://www.rationalresponders.com/refutation_of_pascals_wager_by_massimo_pigliucci

There is also the atheist's wager:

The Atheist's Wager is an atheistic response to Pascal's Wager. While Pascal suggested that it is better to take the chance of believing in a God that might not exist rather than to risk losing infinite happiness by disbelieving in a god that does, the Atheist's Wager suggests that:

You should live your life and try to make the world a better place for your being in it, whether or not you believe in God. If there is no God, you have lost nothing and will be remembered fondly by those you left behind. If there is a benevolent God, he will judge you on your merits and not just on whether or not you believed in him.

 (from wiki)

Here is an excellent refutation of the argument that demonstrates that only atheists can go to heaven!:

 http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/heaven.html

As is often the case, I have more to do than I can handle.  Pththt.  I need to catch up in music theory and review what we've covered thus far.  There's a test this week.

 I'm still thinking about Pascal's Wager (and how sucky it is). :P 

Music theory states that:

P=H

P meaning the popularity of a band.

and H meaning the horridness of the band's music. 

LOL!

One of my music professors is a creationist.  He tried to proselytize me once and said, "Evolution is just a theory." To which I replied, "You teach music theory at the college.  Does that mean music doesn't exist?"

 In a typically fundy move, he caught me at a time when I was weakened.  I should never have trusted his promise to keep his religion to himself.  That was one of the few good jabs I got in because my head was reeling with his attacks and the feeling of having been betrayed.  

Oh well.

Live and learn.  

I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is... 

How has the theory of gravity been proven wrong? Has someone floated off and I didn't hear about it?

Gravity in the classroom.  Take a tall pot filled a third of the way with water  and put it on high heat to boil.  Stirring it will cause the mollecules to move faster and it'll boil faster.  Keep stirring it.  Now take out whatever you'd been stirring it with and watch the water.  It keeps spinning and the boil bubbles all stay at the canter.  This is because the heat pressure pulls everything toward the center and keeps it there, this isn't perfect gravity but it'll spin for a while.

Einstein and gravity:

Sitting at his post in the Bern patent office one day in 1907, Albert Einstein imagined how a housepainter would experience gravity if he fell off a roof. The success of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity had prompted requests for more articles on the subject. As he rewrote the original work, Einstein thought about ways to expand his theory to include the presence of gravity.

On that day, the physicist's daydream ended with what he later called his "happiest moment." He surmised that the unlucky painter would feel weightless when accelerating toward the ground. This clue led Einstein to reason that gravity and acceleration must be equivalent. Called the "equivalence principle," this idea was the seed that—over the next nine years—bloomed into Einstein's masterpiece, the "General Theory of Relativity." This new theory laid the foundation for relativistic astrophysics and modern cosmology.

 -----

Good job, KevinJ, you have a brain the size of the internet and can't think. 

First and foremost, there is a difference between gravity, and gravity theory.

there is also a difference between evolution, and evolution theory.

we know that evolution occurs. we also know that gravity occurs.

the theories of both, are the explanations of how. They haven't been proven wrong. they just have some errors which are being fixed.

As for gravity: Newton did not postulate how gravity works. he only postulated that it happens, and found some very accurate mathematics to predict its behaviour.

The only thing Newton didn't (and couldn't) know at the time, was that the mathematics decreased in accuracy when dealing with extremely large gravitational fields, such as black holes. Einstein created a new set of mathematical laws better describing the gravitational fields when they are much stronger.

The same goes for Kinematics; Newton was not wrong with his mathematics on kinematics. They just decrease in accuracy as velocities approach the speed of light. Again, something Newton didn't and couldn't know at the time.

Now, back to evolution.

Evolution is a fact.
What is evolution?

I can explain what evolution is in seven words:

the change in genetic frequency over time.

That's all.

We know that genetic frequency changes over time. It is a well-documented, scientifically proven, irrefutable fact.

the theory of evolution is different. it is the explanation of how genetic frequency changes over time.

This includes, but is not limited to, natural selection, and genetic mutations.

Also, you clearly misunderstand the idea of a theory.

a theory is built upon the facts and the evidence that we have.

theories are not theories unless they are backed up by scientific evidence.

a hypothesis is different. a hypothesis is an explanation which seems to fit the facts, but is not backed up by evidence.

evolution theory, and gravity theory, are not hypotheses. they are built entirely upon the scientific evidence we have.

Now that I've completely knocked that out of the sky, let's move on...