Some of you wanted my views on the world politics.

Now, I am switching topic for philosophy to the world politics.

Here is your first dose of it - my original, connecting dots.

Islam has a very, very good chance to rule the world unless someone does something about it.

The Super Replicator
Reference:
Stumbling on Happiness, by Daniel Gilbert, National Bestseller. page # 236-244

The philosopher Bertrand Russell explained that believing is "the most mental thing we do". Perhaps, but it is also the most social thing we do. Just as we pass along our genes in an effort to create people whose faces look like ours, so too do we pass along our beliefs in an effort to create people whose minds think like ours.

So what determines whether a belief will be successfully transmitted from one mind to another?
Evolutionary biology teaches us that any gene that promotes its own "means of transmission" will be represented in increasing proportions in the population over time.

For instance, imagine that a single gene were responsible for the complex development of the neural circuitry that makes orgasms feel so good. For person having this gene, orgasms would fee....well, orgasmic. For a person lacking this gene, orgasms would feel more like sneezes - brief, noisy, physical convulsions.

Now, if we took fifty healthy, fertile people who had the gene and fifty healthy, fertile people who didn't and left them on a hospital planet for a million years or so. When we returned we would find a population of thousands or millions of people, almost all of whom had gene. Why? Because a gene that made orgasms feel good would tend to be transmitted from generation to generation simply because people who enjoy orgasms are inclined to do the thing that transmits their genes.


The same logic can explain the transmission of beliefs. If a particular belief has some property that facilitates its own transmission, then that belief tends to be held by an increasing number of minds. The belief doesn't have to be true/false or moral/immoral. Remember, many species are now extinct. There is no right or wrong about it. Truth, logic, moral things doesn't necessarily survive.


The Western culture, ideology, political and social system has been so far proved to be superior to that of Islamic system. However, the same Western ideology that is so superb for a better life, happiness, and enjoyment tell the Westerner not to have many children. As a result they do not. This is counterproductive because although the idea of small family is correct but lacks the self propagating super replicator impetus as explained above.

On the other hand, Muslims, under the Islamic culture and belief system allowed having 4 wives and having large family, and they do. It is also true that under Islamic laws there will be no or very little justice, fairness, freedom to speak or think, women rights, and even the raw standard of living will be much lower than that of today but it has the self-propagating super replicator impetus behind it.

Coupled with the Western value system of giving every individual the right to live and the right to vote Islamic Super Replicator will eat up the Westerner. Same theory tells us that under Islamic ideology the standard of life will drop dramatically. Nevertheless, this super replicator pretty much predestined the future for Islamic rule. It already has started in Europe, America is the next. Australia probably will be the last.

It is also true that under Islamic laws there will be no or very little justice, fairness, freedom to speak or think of. Women’s rights and even the raw standard of living will be much lower than that of today.