“Thankfully paleontologists already confirm his erroneous theories are simply fables.”

You just conjured this lie out of thin air.  I am a biologist, not a paleontologist, but I can still tell you that this is nothing short of complete deceit, and now I have good reason not to take anything you say seriously henceforth since you know nothing about science.

“This letter is to discuss the symbol of your religion: the Darwin “fish”. Yes “religion”, as you have greater faith than I to believe that random chance created the intricate and delicate balance of the universe all from an exploding speck of dust.”

You wear your ignorace of science on your sleeve. First of all, my friend, you have no understanding basic probability theory, because you invoke no God as equal to random chance. In the universe exists almost 100 billion galaxies, all uniformly bound by identical laws of physics. No God. No random chance.

Second of all, an exploding speck of dust? Is this a joke? An explosion implies sound and dust implies rock, neither of which were present when the universe was formed. Are you referring to the energy false-vacuum state of the universal gravity distrubtion at the asympotic singularity point at the moment of the hyper-expansion of the universe. Presumably you are. However, I used multisyllabic words which might be difficult for your 5th-grade brain to comprehend (I imagine you are a small child judging by your prose).

Thirdly. the universe is extremely unbalanced.  The unifying forces are broken like a shattered mirror, the thermodynamic functions which dictate the progression of closed energy systems are causing slow universal decay.

Educate yourself in basic English, phsyics and mathematics. AKA go back to elementry school.

“First, there is a misconception about the title of Darwin’s book, “The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection”. This is, in fact, half of the truth. The full title to Darwin’s book is, “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life”. Did you catch that? “Favored Races”? Adolph Hitler certainly did, hook, line and sinker. Adolph was very much interested in and influenced by Darwin’s work.”

Nonsense. First of all, in science, the word "races" does not refer to human skin color. It refers to the different genetic arms of any species, whose divergence results in a speciative mechanism called cladogenesis. As a definitional hang up, this is the same as claiming "evolution is a theory" as an argument

There is no evidence of a link between Hitler and Darwin. I think you are thinking of Galton, you moron. Adolf Hitler hated the theory of evolution, and your ignorance of History reflects you do not know this. The reason is that Hitler believed the Germans to be a divine race. Obviously the thought that human beings were a divergent arm of the monkey family was horrifying to him. German biology textbooks were rewritten to depict blonde-haired blue-eyed Germans as Master races from God, a notion he reflected in Mein Kampf.

Also, Darwin was not a Eugenicist. That was his cousin Francis Galton, who Darwin detested. Together, Darwin and Huxley spent much time debunking the social Darwinism fallacy in the book The Descent of Man. You were refuted 150 years before you were born.

Of course, it doesn't matter what Darwin thought. I don't really care because his work has been confirmed by every scientist since then. There are over 200,000 papers in molecular and cellular biology, genetics, paleontology, ecological mathematics, population dynamics, biochemistry and regarding evolution published annually. Perhaps I should go up to the scientific community and timidly explain that a ranting 5th grader has debunked them. You see, I actually have this little scroll-like piece of paper from an accredited institution which confirms the fact that I have, in fact, studied evolutionary biology for years.

Science is morally neutral. It can only give us facts. And this is what science tells us about how life originated. It has nothing to do with Hitler's genocide or any of that insanity.

When you do approach the scientific community, you might have some problems. You see, absolutely nothing in biology makes sense except in the context of evolution, so you would have debunk all that other "nonsense" like, oh I don't know, molecular biology, medicine, virology, genetics, bacteriology, etc etc ad infinitum.

Your fish however was created specifically to reflect (worship) on Darwin’s (your prophet) theories about the omnipotent one: time (your god).”

You religious idiots think that everyone has your deluded mindset. Darwin was a scientist. Like any scientist, he got a great deal of things wrong, but he is worthy of respect, not worship. I believe the Earth revolves around the fucking sun. Do I worship Galileo and Copernicus?

Hey I know! You should stop using your computer, your ipod, your TV, your microwave, your car, your phone etc. You know why? Because the man who invented the microchip transistor (William Shockley) was a Eugenecist. You use all these devices, so you worship Shockley! Racist!

Also, why Darwin? Surely, if I believe in evolutionary theory, I also worship Huxley, Mendel, Haldene, or in fact anyone (ie hundreds of thousands of biologistis) who have made a contribution to our understanding of evolution.

You see, science is not like religion. In religion, an ignorant prophet makes up garbage and idiocy and pulls it out of his ass. In science, we have many hardworking people all using experiments, logic, deduction, induction and fair critique to discover truth. Darwin alone hardly "discovered" the evolutionary process. He worked together with at least a dozen individuals like Wallace and Huxley.

I laughed so hard at this. You are living proof of evolution. Some people just don't evolve quite as fast.

deludedgod...

If you ever want a holiday in Western Australia... I'll shout you a free trip. 

I wish I had your ability to express myself so eloquently.

G

My reply might not get posted, so here it is.

 There is so much that is fallacious here....I'll just point out the two things I didn't see debunked on the Rational Response Squad's website.

"While my own religion, which is that of The Messiah, teaches of the equality of all humanity; it is one that is mocked by the many Darwinians."

Nowhere in the old or new testament of the bible does it suggest that all people are equal. All believers, yes, in one verse that Paul supposedly wrote. However, the writer went back on his misogynistic track later on in the letter, so I don't think the one verse really validates this claim. There are a lot of instances in the bible of one form of racism or another, and a lot of anti-nonbeliever discrimination. Do you know of the "Curse of Canaan/Ham" which was written, essentially, to justify the horrible mistreatment of the Canaanites? Later on, it was used to justify mistreatment of black people. Meanwhile, Darwin opposed his distant cousin Francis Galton's Eugenics idea, which is what Hitler ACTUALLY took from.

Secondly, one must take the time and place he lived into consideration. Racism and misogyny was rampant in 19th century Europe, and the UK was no different. If Darwin truly was racist, he'd be conforming to the standard of the time.