Why are u posting the same thing in multiple forums?

But you have managed to be just so, by your sloppy and lazy writing. I regret to inform you that I barely understand what you are saying, largely due to your inability to write properly. As I have stated countless times, anyone who writes in such a manner, so sloppily, automatically looks silly. Why is it considered acceptable on the internet? Consider what happens when someone first glances at the block of text. Because there is no capitalization, it just looks like one big, ugly, run-on sentence. (To those who say I am being a grammar Nazi, I ask you whose post you would rather read). What I can decipher, I shall  refute:

This is either (a) inaccurate or (b) One of multiple definitions of an intentionally nebulous concept. As is traditionally defined quite tightly, religion is concerned with a set of rituals and practices and canonized doctrines or concepts usually pertaining to metaphysical notions and/or deification. Under the broad definition you employed, that religion is something treated with "devotion or keep conscientiousness" the RRS would not necessarily take a hostile sense to every conceivable position that could pertain to these notions. In other words, you have made a fallacy of equivocation, starting with one definition of "religion" within a premise and concluding with a conclusion employing a different definition of the same word. This is automatically invalidated.

This is ridiculous. If you are implying that when people believe certain things, they need no proof to hold them, this can be immediately refuted by pointing out  the many beliefs that I, or other members hold, on rational grounds. Or, perhaps you use belief in the tighter sense of metaphysical beliefs, as in "a believer" like a believer in God? If this is the case, it is nonetheless entirely possible that there are those who hold these positions under the belief that they have good evidence for them. In the latter case, I, personally, being familiar with these proofs, reject them as flawed and incoherent. This leads me to your second point "to those who don't, no evidence is sufficient". This is equally silly, since it may be the case that these "proofs" are being rejected because they really are insufficient, and not because the unbeliever is stubborn.

Anyway, it wouldn't really matter, since such an accusation would be a circumstantial ad hominem, not responding to the arguments of either set for determining who is correct. Thus, the accusation is pointless.

Well Welcome.

This is from something I wrote:

''Atheism is a religion/ atheists have faith.

Premises: Exactly what it says in the title

Problem: Atheism is a religion like bald is a hair color, off is a tv channel, and not playing football is a sport. It is the lack of belief. The Cambridge online dictionary defines religion as  “the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship.’’

An atheist has neither belief in any gods, nor worships any. Religion can also be defined as “a set of rituals and ceremonies pertaining to a deity.” Again, this is not demonstrated in the atheist’s life.

I will assume the Christian reader does not believe in Thor. Is you’re a-Thorism a religion? Do you call yourself a follower of the ‘There is no Thor faith’, and go to Thor unbelief church? No.''

I didn't get the pun anyway.

Pretty much.I've found this site invaluable in many ways.You should try it.

''So what if  people believe something else. Why not just let them be?

Problem:  Remember the Twin Towers? Want to live in a world were stem cell research could prolong lives? Then speak out against religion. If an adult still believed in Santa, wouldn’t you feel compelled to put them straight? Religion is severely dangerous to our world. Try find a war that didn’t have religious influence behind it. Whenever there is religion, knowledge is shunned and ridiculed.

Most christians think the world would be great if everyone thought like they did. We had that once. It was called the Dark Age, and it set humanity back possibly centuries. The fact is, people will rather vote for someone who has no qualification except believing in god, than a highly capable person who doesn’t.

People once believed demons caused illness and drilling holes in peoples head was considered the cutting edge of medicine. If that’s  the world you want, keep up your religion.''

You haven't really,just confused.

Obviously, or it would'nt be belief.Belief with proof is knowledge or fact,not faith.

I'm pretty sure if god decided to make his presence known he could use his amazing powers to prove it to me.