Just to further comment on this, where did that moral view come from?  How is it possible that people, of all mammals on Earth have a moral bone that says murder is bad; (because basically all other animals kill their own and have no reprecussions) or rape is wrong (again because basically all other mammals have recorded occurances of such happenings with no reprecussions) or any other wrongdoing for that matter.  Some mammals eat their young.  Where did our moral understanding that eating our young is wrong come from?  We're all from the same species or unicellular organism... right...????

Animals rarely do anything without a reason.

For instance, a tomcat will kill a litter of kittens.  It's my understanding the reason is because the tomcat is strong enough and healthy enough to kill the kittens, he can now mate with the queen and continue his own (healthy & strong) genes.

Critters rarely kill for the "fun" of it.  A cat teasing a mouse to death in the wild, will then eat it.  The animal is eating to survive.

A mother cat or dog will abandon a pup or kitten that she deems unlikely to survive so as to give the healthy babies more milk so they will survive.

What you are defining as rape in the animal world, if I understand correctly, is simply the mating instinct to keep the species from dying out. 

In the animal world, the weak or injured become dinner to a predator.  This allows the strong and healthy to reproduce and keep the species going.

I think what you are defining as "moral code" is simply the level of intellectual ability.  As humans, we have the ability to empathize and sympathize with pain and suffering.   We care for the weak and injured instead of tossing them aside because we can understand their suffering.

people rarely do anything without a reason.  Just... many times, others don't understand their reasoning, but to them, their reasoning was sound.  Think of the Bloods and Crips.  We might see their fighting and killing as pointless and without reason, but to them, it's defending territory (like animals do) or due to colors, which to them is a big deal and a good reason to pull a gun.

So then rape is ok because I want to keep the species going.  We are after all just mammals who happen to have a more intellectual mind. I fear the wars will start to diminish the numbers of people in the world!

BTW, I would never actually do that, or condone that, but that's just what I'm understanding from that statement above. 

ok, how is it that only humans have that intellectual ability and no other animal species has an intellectual ability even close to that magnitude?  There would have to be neanderthals out there with the median intelectual ability to us.   

Err, I like to think that's it's because of evolution but others prefer to say that God made it that way because thery can't understand evolution.   Either way though those median neanderthals that you're looking for are out there.   You can either go back a couple of hundred thouseand years to find them or look around at some of the higher primate societes in existence today.   I'm pretty sure there's not much rape or baby munching going on there but still a lot of other stuff that we would class as immoral 

Animals don't do things out of anger or retribution. People do.

Animals don't look to "smack someone down" if their sister, mother, religion or whatever is insulted.

Animals don't look to "make you pay" for your insult.

When the kitty piddles on the bed, first check RUN to the vet because it may be physical and kitty is trying to tell you it hurts. Not physical? It very well could be attention-getting behavior.

The cat does not piddle on the bed because it's "pissed" at you. (I get soooo tired of hearing people say that and believe it.)

When the dog destroys the doorframe or sofa pillows when you're gone, it very well may have separation anxiety. Or it may be that there has been a lack of training and attention. Maybe the dog is just plain bored because the owner leaves it alone for too long.

When a critter defends its territory, it's a survival trait to assure there's enough food. Case in point, when there is plenty of food, critters become much less territorial in the wild.

Huh? What I said was "what you are defining as rape". I assumed you meant something along the lines of what appears to us as an unwilling female.

For critters, it's instinct. For us humans, rape has nothing to do with sex, love or keeping the species going; it has to do with anger and control. Human rape has nothing to do with instinct.

I do hope you're kidding.

I figured that.

That's just the way it worked out with evolution. Humans got lucky.

Look at how intelligent chimps, gorillas and dolphins can be. Can you just imagine if they had the physical ability to speak?

By the way, there are neanderthals out there. Trust me. I've dated a few.

I do have to say that animals do in fact attack out of anger at times.  Though their anger trigger would be very different than humans.  Also, I agree, not for retribution.  

Also, how would I go about insulting my cat's mother?   

100% agreed.  I do wish people were more in tune with their pets.  They can't talk to us in English, but they do have a pretty strait forward way of telling us what they want or need.   

yup, agreed 

I do hope you're kidding.

I also realize after posting this reply how way off topic to the original conversation this has gotten, so I've decided to post a new blog with all the information pasted. That way, anyone interrested can continue on this evolution/animals vs. humans topic without taking away from the original intent of whatever blog we might be in.

With that said, I do appologise for not doing this sooner to the creator of this blog.

The title of the new blog is: