Another issue lost due to Youtube pulldown SCIENTISTS PLEASE READ
Submitted by Sapient on September 18, 2007 - 6:39am.
This has not been pushed as much as we wanted to over the last few days because of Operation Spread Eagle.
If you're a science expert and part of our community and want to help, please comment in my blog here. Ashley will be reading, she's the lead on this project which will also be featured in the upcoming Rational Response Squad movie.
Vote for Democrats to save us all from the anti-American Republican party!
»
- Sapient's blog
- Login to post comments
Just give me their claims
Just give me their claims and I will tear them apart for you. Not too much material, please. I used to sift through a lot of creationist material and most of it is so ridiculous that I would surely have joined a Hair Replacement Club had I not limited my daily intake of nonsense. Its just not conduicive to sanity.
"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.
-Me
Books about atheism
deludedgod wrote: Just give
The fact that you do read through any of the nonsense and continue with your sanity is nothing short of a miracle. Of course i say this as i am thinking of checking out a "Creation Science society quarterly" periodical from my University library. I do not think this kind of pseudosicence belongs in any respectable University, espcially a public one.
I find the picture of that
I find the picture of that dinosaur eating a pineapple to be rather offensive.
I just took a look at the
I just took a look at the creation museum brochure. At page 4 they say
"The Digistar3-SP2 digital projector showcases a spectacular spaceflight, a thrilling 22 minute ride billions of light years away to the vast outer regions of our universe."
If they claim that the universe is only 6000-10000 years old, how do they explain these "billions of light years"?
deludedgod wrote: Just give
The creation museum's webpage says that it's "powered by answersingenesis". So just go to http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/qa.asp and you will find many of their claims.