Clockcat... question, plz.
ClockCat wrote:
Doomy prefers those that enjoy close combat over ranged weaponry, and only respects strength and martial prowess.
- What sort of Martial Prowess are we talking about here? Taekwondo? Ninjitsu? Kung-Fu? Bushido? Fisticuffs? Kick-Boxing? Wrestling? Fencing? Choke-Hold? Boxer Rebellion-ism? Chinese Triad? Yakuza? Testudo Formation? Phalanx Formation?
I need something to strive towards in my (nearly unlimited) spare time........ 
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
»
- Kapkao's blog
- Login to post comments
Kapkao wrote: Taekwondo?
Yes...
... but you still dont stand a chance with me, in the ring, on the street, or under the covers...
What Would Kharn Do?
The Doomed Soul wrote:...
It wasn't my intent to stand a chance against you! Indeed, I hope you (or someone like you) defeat me quite brutally every night
<--- as close as I could find to a shit-eating grin
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
The Doomed Soul wrote:Kapkao
so, doomy...do you even have a fuckin' gender? i always assumed you congealed out of molten rock or something...
"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson
an unwelcome guest?
Hey look... I think it's time for Dawson's Creek/Friends/Felicity/Melrose Place/Ally McBeal/Sex and the City on syndicated TV! Let's go watch it! After you, Biwbiek!
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
Kapkao wrote:iwbiek
wow. you lack coherence, you're extremely adept at caps and bold-face, you alter the sizes and colors of your fonts, you love embedding high-larious images, and your skill with emoticons is peerless: no fuckin' way you're a huge mediocrity! "hey, i'll go online and type shit only i will be able to understand the intricate subtleties of! i'll even alter someone's name with a single letter, thus calling their sexuality into question! no way that's sophomoric! it'll be clear to everyone that i'm a fuckin' genius!"
"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson
Aw, you poor thing!
"My genius is even more abundant when I go places I'm not wanted. Y'know, like some tick-infested, homeless, starved-for-attention canine...."
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
Kapkao wrote:iwbiek
i believe i addressed doomy to begin with. let's ask ourselves who started the fuckin' exchange to begin with and what implications that holds for the idea of the starved-for-attention canine.
"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson
iwbiek wrote:i believe i
“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)
(No subject)
mm-hm.
mm-hm.
Glutton for punishment, eh?
I have no life! (but I come by it honestly)