The irrationalism of identity politics
The United States is poised to have either a first African American or woman president and this evokes a sense of legitimate pride and awe that America has its progressive elements. Maybe one day we'll have an atheist president. The sad irony, however, is that the very cultural forces responsible for this long waited change are also regurgitating the same xenophobic traits which society has struggled against.
The bottom line is that if you vote Hillary then you come across as a racist or if you vote Obama you're a sexist. The issues each candidate stands for is drowned out by this stupidity. It's as though the traditionally oppressed groups (women, African Americans, Latinos, etc..) have now morphed into tribal collectives squashing all notion of individual thought. The fact that both candidates will likely be far superior to the current president is immaterial. If you don't adopt a specific rigid set of ideological standards then you are some form of heretic and branded as either racist or sexist. It's no longer oppressive groups struggling for the rights of equality but instead a western variant of tribal warfare between Hutus and Tutsis. And the end result is that this gives cannon fodder for the folks who wish to eliminate all freethinking and skepticism ie. the religious, evangelical far right. And that spells trouble for atheists.
I'm ethnically Indian but I certainly did not have an orgasm when the conservative Indo-American Bobby Jindal became govenor of Louisiana. I disagree completely with the so called idiotic Indian political pundits such as Dinesh D'Souza or Ramesh Ponnuru. Am I a racist or a self-loathing Indian if I supported Christopher Hitchens over Dinesh D'Souza during their debate? It is this kind of shit-headed thinking that unfortunately permeates the mindset of the "enlightened" Left (if you would even call them that).
Would I vote for an atheist candidate simply because he/she is atheist? Of course not! Would I vote for a religious candidate who fully endorsed civil liberties, equality under the law, a fair health care system, avoids unnecessary wars and who places science and reason as the greatest of human endeavors? Hell yes!! But I think it's unllikely that such a candidate would ever emerge.
- Login to post comments
"It's no longer oppressive groups struggling for the rights of equality"
Should be "oppressed" instead of "oppressive." Sorry.
Ragdish, while I don't inherently disagree with what you say, I think there's another factor in this. It's true that all the FAUX News and CNN addicts will interpret this as a fight between racism or sexism. It's also true that many of America's 'general public' will see it that way. However, there really is a growing, and substantial group of white males who are in the rather enviable position of not giving a shit.
Many men, like myself, look at it this way. If I vote for Obama, then blacks will either think I'm patronizing them and trying to make up for years of white domination, or they'll think I'm cool. Women are hardly in a position to gripe about it. If they gripe about sexism when a black man gets elected, they'll look terrible.
If I vote for Hillary, blacks will either think I'm being racist or that I'm cool for voting for a woman. The women will love me.
Either way, the only group that has any social capital to spend on griping about any "ism" is blacks. Having grown up in the south, I've learned that no matter what I do as a white man, there will be blacks who don't like it. If I go out of my way to hire blacks, Bill Cosby will be mad at me for perpetuating the cycle of black dependency on white generosity. If I hire only the best qualified applicants, affirmative action advocates will think I'm being a latent racist.
The point is, no matter who I vote for, there will be a few people who will think I'm being some kind of "ist." The net result, then, is that I can vote for whoever the hell I please, and it won't make any difference. I know that I'm not the only white male who feels this way.
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism