Fox Riley is hollywood, entertainment. The FCC, a branch of the rich, is the enemy. The TV is basically a private monopoly money machine. It needs to be changed asap. EAT THE RICH, enemy number one.

I love to watch this guy. You know why? He's the voice of people that just won't say this kind of stuff to your face.  Granted, it's probably for ratings, but he's tapped into something and exploiting it big time. You should be looking at him as an opportunity to learn how and what some people really think but are probably too fearful to say.  I guess he's a little intolerant, but in the grand scheme of things, aren't we all in a way? Isn't it good to be intolerant of a child molester or Christian/Muslim terrorists?  It's a matter of degrees. I am intolerant to some types of intolerance and tolerant of some other types. It all depends on what it is. Does that make me intolerant?  I lied to my mom yesterday, does that make me a liar? I stole Trident bubble gum from K-Mart when I was 9 does that make me a thief? I laid with a man a few weeks ago, does that make me a homosexual? OK.. well, maybe that one does but you get the point I'm trying to make....  

Bill O'Reilly is the typical right wing asshat.

Rich or NOT our enemy is class warfare!

If you want a mansion and want to work 90 hours a week, I wont judge you for that. But to say that those who have more than us in all cases dispise us is the same as lumping all atheists into the same label.

I agree that the gap between the richest of the rich and the poorest of the poor is lopsided. I agree that business can be carneverious. But I don't believe that we as a species have to disown all who have more or less than we do.

I work for an owner's son whom everyone despises because he thinks by throwing a paycheck at us, that will make us respect him. I can tell you right now that I am more respected at my job than he is.

BUT, that doesn't mean he owes me anything because he has more money.

Your job title and your clothing or if you have to wear a name tag or not does not make you good or bad, your paycheck does not make you good or bad. It is how you treat people and how you want to be treated.

Not all rich people are assholes. I do think on a national economic scale middle and poor class have to compete to put them in their place. But that does not entitle us who have less to lump every rich person in with all rich people.

I'm not going to lump a rich person who gives in with a rich person who says, "Let them eat cake".

 You're right Nordmann, I lay with a man a few weeks ago.... This english language is pretty difficult for a native Urdu speaker...

Shit! I was going to order some of your eggs. The battery hen crap that's sold in the supermarkets here are bland little things which would collapse on the plate if they didn't have a hash brownie to lean against.

Ah well, ek zabān kabhī bhī ziyādah nahīn hotī, as they say. Good luck with the practise of tongues ...

No to Dynasties. The super rich are not friends to "we the people" .... I want fair law.

  Cool, darth returns ....  

Yeah, haters really suck.

What sucks even more is when I'M the one doing the hating. I never learned that whole "let it go" thing. I don't get it when theist crazies say it and I don't get it when atheists say it. The concept just bounces right off of my skull.

When I get aggitated I often times resort to attacking a persons entire community. Telling them that they suck is rarely enough, I have to convince them that everyone they KNOW sucks!

Which is really bad and awesome at the same time

When people attack the groups that I am a part of I usually get mad because they have A) missed the mark entirely or B) hit the mark right on the head.

edit: oops double post

As the great philosopher Karl Popper wrote in 'The Open Society and Its Enemies': "If we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." This refers directly to the intolerance inherent in monotheism, be it Christian, Judaism, or Islam. Just because a Christian, Jewish or Islamic fascist, bigot and racist hides behind the Bible, Torah, or Koran doesn't mean he's not a fascist, a bigot or a racist.

In a genuine quest for equality and freedom for all, religious and otherwise, too many are ignoring a most dangerous and primary characteristic of religion. Religious adherents or faith-based believers are inherently intolerant. Those who hide behind the myth of neutrality in tolerance are too often afraid of intellectual engagement that itself tolerates the intolerant. To tolerate any of the primary monotheistic religions, regardless if Judaism, Christianity or Islam, is to tolerate the intolerant and the most singularly destructive force in the history of civilization.

Understand intolerance in its many degrees and forms. To argue that some views are false, immoral, or just plain silly does not violate any meaningful standard of tolerance as the faithful want you to believe. An unwillingness to recognize and respect differences in opinions or beliefs is intolerance. There’s degrees and types of intolerant extremes ranging from mild prejudice, discrimination, dogmatism, bigotry, fanaticism, and zealotry that so often lead to hate crimes, violence and of course murder.

There’s intolerance of views or ideas and intolerance of actions or behavior. An intolerance of views and ideas ends up a collective morality legislated into law dictating what is ‘right and wrong’ for everyone based on the religious dogma of the majority. Today in America, the most religous country in the western world, the Christian intolerance of anything not Christian (that conflicts with their faith) is legislated into laws that are intolerant of non-Christian social behavior. The Radically Wrong Religious Right controlling America is vastly limiting freedom by legislating a host of harmless social behaviors as unacceptable and illegal. This problem is endemic not just in America, but all deeply religious societies.

There’s an intellectual cowardice about the very nature of religion itself . All too many ignore the rational reality of not just devout Judeo-Christian western societies, but Islamic ones as well. Religion depends on and demands intolerance. It is a requirement for obstinate and unreasoning attachment to any religious faith-based beliefs unfounded in fact. Intolerance is needed for indoctrination and continued adherence to religious dogma. If believers are not intolerant of other religious beliefs or non belief, these faith-based adherents do not remain devout members of their religion.

Tolerance is a trait that the devout monotheistic adherent cannot possibly possess. 'I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt have no other gods before me', saith Jehovah. Which means in plain English that whatever any given god and his clergy believe must be absolutely, positively true; and whatever any other person or group believes must be absolutely, positive false. Religion depends on and demands intolerance.

Intolerance is a requirement for the obstinate and unreasoning attachment to all religious faith-based beliefs unfounded in fact and based in myth [fiction]. Intolerance is needed for indoctrination and continued adherence to religious dogma. If believers are not intolerant of other religious beliefs, or non belief, these faith-based adherents do not remain devout members of their religion. The more devout the religious adherent, the more intolerant they become.

Religion, with such black and white absolutes from fictional god-given standards created by religious leaders, must make the adherent self-deprecating and dehumanized when the err; and must lead them to despise and dehumanize others in an intolerant and bigoted fashion when they act badly. This kind of absolutist, perfectionist, bi dimensional thinking results in the two most corroding human emotions: anxiety and hostility.

The trait of flexibility and tolerance, which are so essential to proper emotional functioning, is blocked and sabotaged by religious belief. For the person who dogmatically believes in god, and who sustains their faith based beliefs unfounded in fact, which they must to continue their faith, clearly is not open to change and is necessarily intolerant to the extreme....

Tolerance of religion is fine in a genuinely free society or a democracy. Sadly at the turn of the 21st Century, Democracy ended in America when Bush ‘took’ office bringing with him his born again Christian zealotry. Given the political Christian zealotry of God's Own Party repeatedly proven to have conspired to overthrow 2 presidential elections in the 21st century it would be very difficult to argue this is still a democracy, even if it could be argued the US ever was a democracy.