I usually like South Park but...

mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
I usually like South Park but...

I Usually like South Park but watching the episode where they imply cartman is crazy because he has a conspiracy theory about the Sept 11th events.  then i think Kyle and Stan go off on Cartman saying that "there was no conspiracy". What a complete let down. The terrorist conspired! They said "There was not a conspiracy, there was a plot"... OMFG! those terms are synonymous.  Sure Cartmans guess was wrong but there was a conspiracy. Maybe they listen to to much right wing radio where the words meaning has been changed to mean crazy plot idea.

 


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
Hmm.. I got something a

Hmm.. I got something a little different from that episode, but it's hard to say for sure what those South Park boys meant.  I felt like they were basically saying, "Look, you dunderheaded conspiracy nuts... you don't know jack shit about this.  You talk so much talk about the government being powerful enough to pull off huge conspiracies, and it doesn't even occur to you that if the government is actually that powerful, they could feed you all the information necessary for you to form the wrong conspiracy theory so that you would play right into their hands."

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
 i just watched again and

 i just watched again and kyle says verbatim "because anyone who thinks 911 was a conspiracy is a retard" well it was, a group of terrorist conspired it. so while i agree there are nutty conspiracy theories out there, one cant imply that they all are. and when they say "anyone who thinks 911 was a conspiracy is a retard" they seem a bit daft to me. 

 


phooney
phooney's picture
Posts: 385
Joined: 2007-02-07
User is offlineOffline
I had no problem with this,

I had no problem with this, because I thought it was reasonably clear they were talking about an intentional friendly-fire conspiracy.


Nikolaj
Superfan
Nikolaj's picture
Posts: 503
Joined: 2008-04-27
User is offlineOffline
Yearh, I gotta agree with

Yearh, I gotta agree with Phooney. You are just splitting words here. Splitting words is a pretty weak objection to anything. Words only mean something in context, and clearly, the episode is dealing with the "The American Government did it"-conspiracy.

It's like if I said: "I feel like it's my right to say what I want"

and you said:

"I agree that you deserve free speech, we are completely on the same page, but you are very daft in saying: you feel it is your right. Clearly you can't apply your sense of touch to your right to free speech. It's daft to say that you can"

Splitting words get's you nowhere. Context mate, it's what language is made of.

Well I was born an original sinner
I was spawned from original sin
And if I had a dollar bill for all the things I've done
There'd be a mountain of money piled up to my chin


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
 Well context does matter

 Well context does matter but in this episode it is blurred when they say near the end that "911 wasnt a conspiracy, it was a plot". clearly it was both. And when someone like my daughter hears this and doesn't know what conspiracy means it teaches her the wrong meaning. Which might be why when some  hear "conspiracy theory" they immediately discredit the theory. so yeah context matters but that sentence by itself is nonsense and doesn't help coherency thus it fucks up the joke for me lol.

 

 

 

P.S is it really that hard to say "the real conspiracy was X"?


Kavis
atheist
Kavis's picture
Posts: 191
Joined: 2008-04-17
User is offlineOffline
South Park should not be

South Park should not be educational material for anyone.  If your daughter is learning things from that show, I'm a little alarmed.

Religion is a virus.
Fight the infection.


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
everyone learns language

everyone learns language this way. You start learning language this way long before school. another quote from the episode... "Butters, do you think 911 was just a plot by some angry terrorist or do you think there was some kind of cover up?" over and over its as if they don't know the meaning of the word.  

can you show me quotes from the episode that clearly show the opposite of what quotes i have shown? i just want some evidence.

 

P.S it is obvious they are mainly trying to imply that the nuts like cartman are wrong, but! You one could still misunderstand the word (conspiracy) and make the case they are making using their context and exact words. so you would need a sentence from that episode that clearly shows they know the meaning of the word.


Nikolaj
Superfan
Nikolaj's picture
Posts: 503
Joined: 2008-04-27
User is offlineOffline
mohammed wrote: Well context

mohammed wrote:
Well context does matter but in this episode it is blurred when they say near the end that "911 wasnt a conspiracy, it was a plot". clearly it was both. And when someone like my daughter hears this and doesn't know what conspiracy means it teaches her the wrong meaning. Which might be why when some  hear "conspiracy theory" they immediately discredit the theory. so yeah context matters but that sentence by itself is nonsense and doesn't help coherency thus it fucks up the joke for me lol.

Because that's what "Conspiracy Theory" means: it is a derogatory term that describes a theory based on no good evidence, but rather on paranoia, and delusions of grandour on the part of the person proposing the theory. And so, it should be discredited.

It doesn't matter that the two words "conspiracy" and "theory" doesn't have any derogatory connotations, this is just what the expression "Conspiracy Theory" have come to mean in modern English.

I don't think you'll find many people who believe a spacecraft landed at Roswell, that describe their own beliefs as a "Conspiracy Theory", because they know, like all other speakers of modern English, what the negative connotations of that expression is. They may call it a rational and reasonable theory, that deals with conspiracy, but not a "Conspiracy Theory"

It's like the word "Homophobia". Homophobia means a dislike of homosexual people, even though the suffix "Phobia" actually means fear, not dislike, and homo means "same". But the word has entered the English language meaning "dislike of gays", not "fear of sameness", and everyone knows what a person means when they refer to "homophobia".

Did you know that the historical origin of the words "Lord" and "Lady" comes from old English words that means: "He who bakes the bread", and "She who shapes the dough into bread"?

This is because way back in bronze-age or iron age times, the owner of a farmstead was responsible for baking the bread (or being in charge of the people who did if it was a large farm), and his wife was in charge of preparing the dough for baking (or being in charge of the ones who did).

As farmsteads grew larger and larger, into estates and even counties, the "Lord" and the "Lady" no longer actually did any of the hands-on work, but they were still the people in charge, so the titles remained the same (Or rather, the words have been warped over time, but they come from rootwords that meant "Baker" and "bread-shaper" )

Interestingly, since bread meant the difference between life and death in early agricultural societies, meat, while ofcourse a more prestigious thing to eat, was still secondary in importance to bread, so the Lord's right hand man was in charge of tending to the meat, not the lord himself. And so...

The word Steward, a title of immense importance in medieval times, basically the Minister of Finance, the person that was in charge of the King's treasury, "actually" means, "The boy who tends to the pig sty (the Sty Warden)".

or rather, it would have meant that, if the meaning of words was written in stone. But they are not. If you said "The King's Steward" to someone in medieval England, they would think of one of the few people in the world who never had to go near a pig, and also one of the few who actually got to eat one from time to time.

So words mean what society agrees that they mean. Words are given meaning by the way they are heard and understood, not by how they are said. So... Context.

And since you said that you understood what the South Park boys meant in the context of the episode, I can't understand your objection. They communicated exactly what they wanted.

 

P.S: Sorry, I'm a huge geek for linguistics. It's my favorite subject. That's why I write so much for such a short point.

 

Well I was born an original sinner
I was spawned from original sin
And if I had a dollar bill for all the things I've done
There'd be a mountain of money piled up to my chin


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
yes 911 was a conspiracy but

yes 911 was a conspiracy but not a conspiracy theory. it is accepted as fact by rational people radical Muslims did it. there is plenty of evidence to support it.

from 0-51 seconds when cartman first brings it up and kyle says"911 wasnt a conspiracy" it just hits me that way. and a few of my friends as we watch it (and laugh because SP is funny as hell) check it out http://allsp.com/l.php?id=e148

 

 

Anyway you are probably right and they did mean it in that way. Next time someone comes up to you and says "911 was a conspiracy" will you say yes the terrorist did conspire the attack?

 

 


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Kavis wrote:South Park

Kavis wrote:

South Park should not be educational material for anyone.  If your daughter is learning things from that show, I'm a little alarmed.

... hey thats no fair, i totally didnt know what a quiff was until i watched south park

What Would Kharn Do?


Nordmann
atheist
Nordmann's picture
Posts: 904
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
mohammed, the whole

mohammed, the whole programme satirises how conspiracy theories gain currency and how paranoid fantasy, for a lot of people, is more important than credibility - let alone proof. It does this by hypothesising humorously on the implications of those conspiracy theories which do exist actually being true.

 

It is a surreal context (the words "terrorism" and "terrorist" aren't even mentioned) and by definition a very limited one. Conspiracy theorism in reality is exactly the same (so spot-on satire again from SP) - for the "theory" to sound plausible the audience has to be hoodwinked or encouraged to completely disregard all input which will puncture the hypothesis. When necessary it uses popular semantic short-cuts to obfuscate fact and steer the audience into agreement.

 

Though the line does not appear in the episode as you quote it above, the notion that "9/11 was not a conspiracy, it was a plot", which is implied, is therefore perfect satire in itself and completely in the context of the general satirical point being made.

 

But well done for spotting a pivotal concept on which the whole satire was based, even if you did wrongly identify it as a flaw. You may be surprised to learn as well therefore that one person cannot repeatedly die, that the top half of one's head does not dislocate completely when one talks, and homosexual teachers who educate classes via glove puppets do not exist (at least outside of Maine).

I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
Nordmann wrote:mohammed, the

Nordmann wrote:

mohammed, the whole programme satirises how conspiracy theories gain currency and how paranoid fantasy, for a lot of people, is more important than credibility - let alone proof. It does this by hypothesising humorously on the implications of those conspiracy theories which do exist actually being true.

 

come on man no shit... it obvious i knew what the main joke was.. i think the delivery of the "conspiracy definition joke"was ambiguous as did 3 other friends when we watched. its OK, Matt and trey are not perfect. They have even defended big tobacco. So they can be downright stupid sometimes. none of us are always right. even South Park.

 

Quote:

You may be surprised to learn as well therefore that one person cannot repeatedly die, that the top half of one's head does not dislocate completely when one talks, and homosexual teachers who educate classes via glove puppets do not exist (at least outside of Maine).

are you trying to be an asshole here? i mean Kenny, the floppy separated heads of the Canadians and Mr. Garrison are pretty bad analogies when compared to the word "conspiracy" which is used in the wrong way almost every single day on conservative talk radio in real life. 

 

Quote:

Though the line does not appear in the episode as you quote it above, the notion that "9/11 was not a conspiracy, it was a plot", which is implied, is therefore perfect satire in itself and completely in the context of the general satirical point being made.

 

As i said in my previous post i believe that the misrepresentation is satire. It sure didn't come across that way as clearly as it should have IMO.

So yes i made the mistake and took the satire wrong. i assumed that the characters (Stan and Kyle) were being presented as completely knowledgeable as they sometimes are. This time they were not. 


Nordmann
atheist
Nordmann's picture
Posts: 904
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
Quote:are you trying to be

Quote:

are you trying to be an asshole here?

 

No I am not. "Conspiracy" is used the wrong way by right wing TV commentators only because the context in which it is said and meant to be understood is limited, and purposefully so. Within the terms of reference it is therefore admissable and understandable, but only if the context is understood. Agreeing or not with that context is immaterial.

 

For example in the limited context of SP, resurrectional children and Mr. Garrison make sense since the delivery of the satirical point has been made contingent on a certain level of surreality designed by the show's creators and which the audience must at least temporarily buy into in order to appreciate that point.

 

I do however cede completely the point about the dislocating top halves of heads. This is not surreal at all. Right wing TV commentators often dislocate their brains from their mouths when speaking too.

 

We all need to get out more.

 

I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
Nordmann wrote:I do however

Nordmann wrote:

I do however cede completely the point about the dislocating top halves of heads. This is not surreal at all. Right wing TV commentators often dislocate their brains from their mouths when speaking too.

 

 Radio too.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


Nordmann
atheist
Nordmann's picture
Posts: 904
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
Quite correct, Matt. But

Quite correct, Matt.

 

But the visual effect of the gag is muted somewhat.


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
Some of them have their

Some of them have their brain separated from their fingers too - ie Anne Coulter and Michelle Malkin. I suspect they write their articles/books in crayon with lots of mispellings before they are typed.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


Nordmann
atheist
Nordmann's picture
Posts: 904
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
A bit like some contributors

A bit like some contributors here sometimes.

 

Some faults are happily secular.