Personality by State??

Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
Personality by State??

From the Wall Street Journal:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122211987961064719.html?mod=yhoofront

Quote:

Certain regional stereotypes have long since become cliches: The stressed-out New Yorker. The laid-back Californian.

But the conscientious Floridian? The neurotic Kentuckian?

You bet -- at least, according to new research on the geography of personality. Based on more than 600,000 questionnaires and published in the journal Perspectives on Psychological Science, the study maps regional clusters of personality traits, then overlays state-by-state data on crime, health and economic development in search of correlations.

Bear in mind, this is only a newspaper article.  I am just seeing this for the first time, and have not read the study itself.  However, it's an interesting idea, and worth conversation, I think.   There are a ton of chicken-egg issues with this idea.  However, for many people's purposes, correlation may be enough without understanding causation.  Want to live in a conscientious state?  Try Florida.  Like the Type-A existence?  Try New York.

Interesting stuff.

 

 


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13254
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
It seems logical to a

It seems logical to a certain extent. With certain areas having reputations for certain activities or attitudes, people who hear of them and agree with them but are surrounded by people who disagree would be inclined to relocate, creating a self fulfilling prophecy. Something I'd not considered before.

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
I certainly know my share of

I certainly know my share of gays who have moved to San Francisco, even if only for a summer or two.  I imagine that if this could ever be reduced to cause/effect, it would be pretty complicated, though.  I'm not going to hold my breath.

In fact, there are times when I look at science journals, particularly social science ones, and think, "Thank you very much, Captain Obvious."  You know, it's one of the only annoying things about science.  Even if something is patently obvious, you need to make absolutely certain that it is what it appears to be.  So, you sometimes have to do studies that seem pretty trivial, or even wasteful.

I remember reading an abstract that amounted to this:  Babies born to women who lived in highly polluted areas during gestation are less healthy than those born to women who lived in largely unpolluted areas during gestation.

No shit.

The thing is, though, this kind of study can still give us useful information if we do manage to learn something about the underlying causes.  For instance, isolating a particular illness because of studying pollution in fetuses might lead to a discovery about a particular gene that expresses because of pollution, which might lead to something monumental in genetics.  You never know.

 

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


TheHermit
TheHermit's picture
Posts: 32
Joined: 2008-01-22
User is offlineOffline
Why is it that I'm not

Why is it that I'm not surprised my home state of NH scores dead last on extravertedness?

We have a saying around these parts: "If someone's knocking on your door and you didn't invite them, they want something from you."