Revealing the thread: 'Atheists hit a new low'
For those of you that are interested in the finer points of debating philosophical, political, religious, and various other arguments, it's a good idea to understand the exact nature of the "arguments" you're reading.
Hence, the TRUE REASON for the intent of this thread is about to be revealed!
Assume you're given the following two choices by which to classify the argument I put foward in the OP of my thread "Atheists hit a new low."
Is the argument a simplistic example of:
A) casuistry,
OR
B) sophistry?
Which of the two above choices would most accurately describe the nature of the argument???
Feel free to explain why you would chose A over B, or visa versa.
- Login to post comments
I suppose i should rectify this aswell...
-70% of the global crime rate, and elimination of all wars... can we consider that a "good" thing?
What Would Kharn Do?
Well, would you consider living in continual fear that if you stray from some unknowable secret path decided on by a vengeful yet unnamed god, you will die a good thing?
That actually brings me to one of the nits that I have with death note. Since I am only halfway through the cartoon, I don't know if this is eventually fixed but even so:
Light wants to be worshiped as a god. Yet unless he reveals himself to the world and tells everyone what to do to avoid his wrath, then the most that can come from using the death note is to setup a situation where people are worshiping Kira. What Kira really wants, is any body's guess since nobody really knows what the deal is.
Also, I found L to be more evil than Light. Really, Light had Ryuk messing with his head. If you want to say that Ryuk is evil then the idea is that that evil is slowly infecting Light. If Ryuk is not evil, then what?
However, remember when L first comes into the story. He picked that convict that was going to be killed later on as a fall guy to test a theory that there might be some connection between Kira and the first unexplained death (the street punk outside the store who was messing with Light's friend). If the theory had been wrong, then what? And what is L's excuse for that type of behavior. He certainly did not have a real death god messing with his head. He was fucked up entirely on his own merit.
What about Light's father? He allowed his house to be bugged because L felt a vague unease about some facts that did not add up. Then, later on, the father allowed both of them to spend a few months in solitary confinement, again based on no evidence what so ever.
=
He does in a way, but doesnt show "himself" , and wont, until his all the people trying to dispose of him, were killed
L is a little cold-hearted, and for the most part, purely logical, which is why the story got as far as it did, really... he's not so much as evil, as a bastard.
Lights stay in solitary came from his planned confession, and Lights father willfully went into solitary for mental reasons (if Light turned out to be Kira, he was gonna kill him, and then himself)
What Would Kharn Do?
Bored. Ryuk was bored. He had no malicious intent. He was apathetic towards humans. They were basically a food source for his kind (in that they killed them to extend their own lives). He didn't care what they did to each other so long as they kept him entertained. And Ryuk never messed with Light's head. Aside from providing the Death Note, Ryuk played a very small part in any of Light's plans. Light's actions were his and his alone. Ryuk only provided him the opportunity to fulfill that potential.
And so was Light. In fact, I would argue that the two men were reflections of each other. If L had been the one to find the Death Note, he may well have been Kira with Light (if he'd been given the opportunity) hunting him. I saw them as basically the same character, the only thing seperating them was their situation.
Rill
Noooooooo! Thomathy! Not anime!
It's like I don't even know you!
...
Oh, wait ...
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
BigUniverse wrote,
"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."
Since we seem to be going for the most epic derail of all time ... did that meet in Toronto ever pan out?
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
Not as such. Plus, I'm leaving soon for a vaca. I'd like for those here to do a get together, so we'll see how it works out in time.
BigUniverse wrote,
"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."
ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY PANDA!
Epic derail continues...
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
The Cosmic Moose is Supreme! The Panda is a chump!
(high five for entering record-breaking epic derail territory)
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
*Whispers*
Ok, remember to put your claws out for that high 5, that wuss won't know what hit him!
*Smiles, goes for it*
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Did you just pull the wus card? A moose is a gigantic, woodsy, rough-and-rugged tower supported by rock-hard hooves and topped by pointy, hard cartilage. It would impale you without a second thought.
Pandas are cranky balls of fluff that are too weak to move very fast because their food source (bamboo) has no nutritional value. I could probably put a tu-tu on a panda without injury. Try that shit on a moose.
Moose 1, Panda 0
Suck on that, panda-lover.
I can't even believe a Canadian is opting for panda over moose. It's practically treason.
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
One swipe, and the Moose is drinking through a straw for eternity. One more, and there's a head on the ground. All the Moose could do is a head butt. But bear skull = moose skull, so that goes nowhere. Claws ftw!
And I had already established that the Beaver is the Son of the Panda. The Beaver was thereafter adopted as the national animal of Canada, which also happens to have more Bears than any other nation on Earth.
Whereas the moose is.... just a moose.
Who's the traitor again?
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
So let's see here, Pandas eat leaves and shoots. Moose eat leaves and twigs.
Cats eat herbiviorous animals.
Um, yah...
=
So let's see here, Pandas eat leaves and shoots. Moose eat leaves and twigs.
Cats eat herbiviorous animals.
Um, yah...
=
Pandamnit! The Cat is supposed to be kept quiet to those who haven't paid their joining fee of $10,000. Are you trying to bankrupt us?! Fucking hell.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.