Religious people more likely to give?

Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
Religious people more likely to give?

With all the stat topics recently, I decided to do some digging and found a poll about charity in Canada, US, and the UK.

 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/102961/charitable-giving-differs-canada-uk-us.aspx

 

Quote:

In Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, those who say religion is an important part of their daily lives are more likely than those who don't to say they have donated money and volunteered time. In both cases, the differences are most pronounced in the United States. Seventy-one percent of U.S. respondents who say religion is important in their lives also say they donated money to charity in the last month, while 50% of those who say religion is not important say they donated. The gap is somewhat smaller in regard to volunteering time. Fifty percent of U.S. respondents who say religion is important say they volunteered time, compared with 34% among respondents who say religion is not important.

 

The importance of religion does not appear to be a factor in Canadians' or Americans' likelihood to report being a good Samaritan. Respondents in Canada and the United States who say religion is an important part of their daily lives are no more likely than those who say it is not to say they had helped a stranger in need in the last month. However, in the United Kingdom, those who say religion is an important part of their daily lives are more likely by -- 17 percentage points -- to say they had helped a stranger.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:o

 

Quote:

In Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, those who say religion is an important part of their daily lives are more likely than those who don't to say they have donated money and volunteered time. In both cases, the differences are most pronounced in the United States. Seventy-one percent of U.S. respondents who say religion is important in their lives also say they donated money to charity in the last month

 

They say it. That doesn't mean they do it.

 

There are huge disconnects here. Most christians say that they go to church regularly, when they don't. I'm sure you have seen that poll too there.

 

Just because more of them make a claim, doesn't mean it is true. Also, what is "charity" exactly? If it is going to church infrastructure via collection plate, I'm willing to bet they still call it charity giving. If they help with a church activity, is that volunteered time too?

 

Asking someone what they do is never going to get any kind of accurate answer, especially if it is a choice that involves how they think people perceive them.

 

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
"3

I honestly don't see why you would post this. There are..so many problems with trying to base anything off this poll.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


cervello_marcio
Superfan
cervello_marcio's picture
Posts: 210
Joined: 2009-05-19
User is offlineOffline
My parents call donating

My parents call donating money to the ABC for mission work charity donation. Only problem is, the ABC was skimming money off the top and now they're just taking it all for themselves. I'm not entirely convinced by these stats for the same reasons as ClockCat.

 

"Do not, as some ungracious pastors do, show me the steep and thorny way to heaven. Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine, himself the primrose path of dalliance treads. And recks not his own rede."


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

My parents call giving money to open a new church charity, or paying the minister's payroll charity too.

 

Oh, and buying 500000 little bibles is charity, and standing in public places forcing them on people is volunteering time.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

I'm sure the people shoving pamphlets in my door next to the NO SOLICITING sign are volunteering time too, and the pamphlets had to be paid for with charity.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

Jehovah's Witnesses are full of volunteering their time every saturday morning. Their driving around and the material they hand out is no doubt charitable too!

 

 

 

Oh look, this came from charity and volunteer work too!

 

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is a nonprofit organization with a mission to protect marriage and the faith communities that sustain it. (By removing the right to marry for anyone other than themselves)

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

So I called and asked my mom about this, and she feels like when she buys these videos (left behind and crap) she is making charitable donations too. Because the guy selling it on the christian TV station tells her it is.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


latincanuck
atheist
latincanuck's picture
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2007-06-01
User is offlineOffline
That's the real question,

That's the real question, how do they interpret those questions.

Donated to charity, well according to 3 of my christian friends, they gave to the church, hence they gave to charity (although almost none of that money goes to the poor, but to sustaining the church itself.) Charity on the atheists side they all donated, so 100 percent for each (3 on each side)

Volunteered, for what exactly? Helping the poor, again same three volunteered at the church, my atheists friends volunteered as well helping out at work, and volunteered for their kids clubs/school/sports activity, however in the context of the survey as asked here (from what you posted) none of them volunteered in charitable ways per se.

Helping a stranger: Theists again, donated to the church therefore helped a stranger, yet the atheists well they didn't help a stranger directly but all donated to good will, and gave money for homeless sheltering in toronto. The problem is the questions are vague or at least how they are showed in the polls you posted, therefore I really can't say yeah that's a detailed thing. Next would be HOW much did each side donate really to charity. To helping the poor etc, etc, etc.


pauljohntheskeptic
atheistSilver Member
pauljohntheskeptic's picture
Posts: 2517
Joined: 2008-02-26
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:My parents

ClockCat wrote:

My parents call giving money to open a new church charity, or paying the minister's payroll charity too.

 

Oh, and buying 500000 little bibles is charity, and standing in public places forcing them on people is volunteering time.

 

I'd agree with you here. In the US, giving money to a Church is considered giving to a charity so I see this poll as meaningless. The question should have been presented as other than giving money to a church or a religious group do you give money to charity. I think this would completely alter the results.

As to volunteering time, the 7th Day Adventists, Mormons, and the Jehovah Witnesses' do much volunteering ringing my doorbell and leaving trash to be disposed of. Again, the question should have been, other than religious and church activities do you volunteer your time. 

 

 

____________________________________________________________
"I guess it's time to ask if you live under high voltage power transmission lines which have been shown to cause stimulation of the fantasy centers of the brain due to electromagnetic waves?" - Me

"God is omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, - it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these divine attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks please. Cash and in small bills." - Robert A Heinlein.


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
Dude, you've made like 6

Dude, you've made like 6 posts in half an hour, take a breath and unbunch your panties.

 

 

Let's give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that all American donated to charities like NOM. So what about Canada and the UK? The ones you listed were American Charities.

 

Oh and I'll try to find it, but I think 56% of gave to religious organizations such as churches or whatever and 75% of people gave to other such as MS foundation for example.

 

 

 


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
 http://www.gallup.com/poll/

Ciarin
Theist
Ciarin's picture
Posts: 778
Joined: 2008-09-08
User is offlineOffline
I donate to heifer

I donate to heifer international through my religious organization. It's a good charity, check it out:

 

http://www.heifer.org/


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/113497/despite-economy-charitable-donors-volunteers-keep-giving.aspx

 

 

 

 

It was 59%, not 56%

 

 

For Volunteer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So lets stay with the same year as the other figures.

 

Then subtract atheists from the "other charitable cause", which likely only donate and volunteer to non-religious things.

 

And....what are you left with? At the very best, you can hope 50% of the religious people's money/volunteer went to religion.

 

Yeah. And this is still just a poll, asking them what they "think" they do.

 

Also, how many people did one one or the other, rather than neither or both?

 

 

There are so many gaps here.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Tapey
atheist
Tapey's picture
Posts: 1478
Joined: 2009-01-23
User is offlineOffline
Is it just me or do those

Is it just me or do those results seem far to high. I cannot imagen 71% of any group of people giving money to charity. I would imagen its about 5% here as i don't know a single person who gives to charity or donates it to any cause really (if you exclude churches). Maybe its just the gap between america and south Africa. But either way the results don't suprise me( besides the high percentages on both sides). Giving to a church is giving to charity atleast here I assume its the same in ohter places as churches here do donate food to desperatre families and do charity events.

Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
No animal shall wear clothes.
No animal shall sleep in a bed.
No animal shall drink alcohol.
No animal shall kill any other animal.
All animals are equal.


latincanuck
atheist
latincanuck's picture
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2007-06-01
User is offlineOffline
it's all good

In the end it's charity, I get to fall under both the non-religious and religious charities (work with helping kids get out of gangs, with a local church and a city program) So I am rare non-theists that gets to add religious charity to that table.


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
 I think this is a good

 I think this is a good demonstration of the psychological tendency of people to view themselves as more altruistic than they are.  I can't remember where I saw it (I'll post it if I can recall) but I remember reading that slightly less than one in five people regularly give to charities.  That's in the U.S. only, IIRC.

Taking myself as an example, if you asked me if I had given to charity this year, I'd probably have said yes initially, but I took the time to actually check my records, and it's been over two years since I made a personal donation to charity.  My business does, but only when it receives credit for doing so publicly, so that's really advertising.

Also, many people pledge money to charities but then don't follow through.

If I had to make a guess, I'd guess that religious and non-religious people are approximately equal in charitable giving.  That is... real giving, not to churches or other non-charities as discussed above.  If anyone can find real numbers, I'd like to know if I'm right.

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
 Here's a start:

 Here's a start:

Pie chart of 2008 contributions by charitable cause

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
 and:     11 percent of

 and:

 

 

  • 11 percent of households contributed to religious causes only.
  • 21 percent contributed to only secular causes.
  • 34 percent contributed to both religious and secular causes.
  • Arts donors' contributed on average 2.1 percent of their income to secular causes, one of the highest shares of income for secular giving. The average amount contributed to the arts by donors was $215.
  • Education donors supported, on average, 2.7 other secular causes averaging 1.5 percent of their income. The average amount contributed to education by these donors was $416.
  • Donors to health-related causes support, on average, 2.4 other secular causes. Health donors give amounts to secular causes that average 1.2 percent of their income. The average amount contributed to health organizations by donors is $298.
  •  
  •  

    Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

    http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
    Books about atheism


    Hambydammit
    High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
    Hambydammit's picture
    Posts: 8657
    Joined: 2006-10-22
    User is offlineOffline
     If I'm reading that last

     If I'm reading that last one right, then taking religious donations out of the equation, 21% of nonreligious people donated and 23% of religious.  Of course, there's a problem with doing that because the Salvation Army is a genuine charity and does charitable work and is religious.  So... we can't really figure out from this how many people are just throwing their money at religious "charities" that just promote religion, etc.

     

     

    Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

    http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
    Books about atheism


    Cpt_pineapple
    atheist
    Posts: 5492
    Joined: 2007-04-12
    User is offlineOffline
    Hamby, do you have a link to

    Hamby, do you have a link to where you're getting these numbers?

     

     

    Oh and BTW, it would be 34% religious and 21% non-religious.

     

    I think you got the 23% religious by subtracting the 11% religious only, from the 34% both.

     

     

    However, the 34% was to BOTH religious and non-religious, so even if you take away the religious charities, you still get 34%, and as you mentioned organizations such as the Salvation Army and the YMCA etc.....are religious.

     

    So contrary to Clockcat's little rant, there are worthwhile religious charities.

     

     

     


    Hambydammit
    High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
    Hambydammit's picture
    Posts: 8657
    Joined: 2006-10-22
    User is offlineOffline
     http://www.nps.gov/partners

     http://www.nps.gov/partnerships/fundraising_individuals_statistics.htm

    Yeah, you're right... I screwed up the math.  I think if anything, this thread has proven that neither of us can do simple math

     

    Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

    http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
    Books about atheism


    ClockCat
    ClockCat's picture
    Posts: 2265
    Joined: 2009-03-26
    User is offlineOffline
    :3

    Cpt_pineapple wrote:

    So contrary to Clockcat's little rant, there are worthwhile religious charities.

     

     

    I in no way said there were not religious charities that actually did help people. If you lump them all together though under "charities", I am very skeptical. I don't consider buying "left behind" tapes as charity, nor do I consider pledges to the 700 club, or money donated to churches that goes to infrastructure. (Paying the salary of a minister is not my idea of a worthwhile charity)

     

     

    So when you ask people if they "give to charity" vaguely, that kind of makes the poll useless for much. Not only because you are just asking them, but also because people define charity differently...and many religious people consider the donation plate on sunday as charity. Even if none of it goes to helping anyone.

     

    The church I went to last has millions they are sitting on, and don't put it anywhere but "missions", or building new churches to collect more money to build new churches to collect more money....

     

     

    You get the idea.

    Theism is why we can't have nice things.


    ClockCat
    ClockCat's picture
    Posts: 2265
    Joined: 2009-03-26
    User is offlineOffline
    :o

    In addition, the amounts given are largely going to differ as well, and from what groups. There is no breakdown of this information. We have whether or not people think they gave, and we have total amounts given.
     

    Not to mention that many people are giving to charity simply as a tax-writeoff, because they would rather choose where to send it.

     

    My "rant" as you call it, is simply pointing out that using these polls to base any kind of conclusion isn't a good idea.

    Theism is why we can't have nice things.