Navigation

The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us.

Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple

Brian Sapient on Twitter

Celebrity Atheists

List of atheist sites

Ask the atheist

Antiques and Art

What is a 'Consistent Atheist', Jean?

Posted on: March 22, 2011 - 8:54pm

Sandycane

Sandycane's picture

Posts: 970

Joined: 2010-10-16

Offline

What is a 'Consistent Atheist', Jean?

Borrowed from another thread:

Hi Sandy,

I understand your position since you are an atheist. But I've been arguing this since I got here. A consistent atheist is a screw up. They have no morals.

Dan Barker from FFRF says he BORROWS the morals from Christianity (more like steals). Which demonstates that atheism is an empty void of nothing. It's like Nietche nihilism.

Now, I speak of consistent atheists. This actually makes me sad. But it is my argument and Jimmy is the 2nd example on here to demonstate my point.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

Okay, Jean, I'll bite.

1) What's the difference between a 'consistent atheist' and an atheist?

2) What makes you think that atheists borrow their morals from christianity?

'Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.' A. Einstein

Login to post comments

Posted on: March 29, 2011 - 8:41pm #101

redneF

redneF's picture

Posts: 1970

Joined: 2011-01-04

Offline

Jean Chauvin wrote:Um, wow,

Jean Chauvin wrote:

Um, wow, what honesty. I say this all the time and I get resistence. You do not know, you are guess or "think what's happening."

You do know, this was not your position when I first met you.

He's not changed his position at all.

You simply interpret his comments, inappropriately.

Jean Chauvin wrote:

So then, if you agree with my position regarding your atheism in regards to empiricism, then by default, empiricism and all other forms of secular attempts at knowing are nil.

If he agreed with you, he'd articulate that clearly.

No need for you to intervene and 'project'.

Jean Chauvin wrote:

You agree.

No, he hasn't.

Jean Chauvin wrote:

So you contradicted yoruself

False.

You 'projected' your incorrect interpretations.

I keep asking myself " Are they just playin' stupid, or are they just plain stupid?..."

"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy" : David Brooks

" Only on the subject of God can smart people still imagine that they reap the fruits of human intelligence even as they plow them under." : Sam Harris

Login to post comments