Once they get around to adding "asshat" to the dictionary, they ought to put Wank Falton's picture next to the definition.

I just gave some quotes to the author of this blog, and here is the article he wrote...

 

We just found out today about a glaring hypocrisy in Frank Walton. (not that there was any doubt before as to his twatwadish behavior)

Frank has apparently at one point whined about his personal information being posted and this is what he said:

"Not only that but agnostic Ed Babinski has hounded me for not giving out personal information about myself (where I'm from, what school I go to, my major, etc.). I told him that I didn't want to give out said information because I crave a certain amount of anonymity. It's for my protection from any fundamentalist atheist who may lash out at me or harass me. Guess what? Babinski didn't care. Instead of respecting my privacy, he continued to send me e-mails over and over and over again requesting personal info about myself." - Frank Walton

Here is a link to his whining.

Frank got what he deserves there, and I offer this thread as a place to post all of the personal information you want about Frank Walton. Since Frank found out Brian Sapient's real name, who he knows needs to be protected due to an onslaught of death threats unlike Walton will ever see, Frank Walton has consistently posted Sapient's real name. Frank doesn't care!

Frank Walton consistently posts Sapient's real name and is therefore putting other human life at risk including that of the innocent children in his life. For those that are curious, as anti-theistic as he is Sapient has offered to take his own child to church if he was interested, his child instead chose video games. He has apparently made this offer to his child every year, and seeks to shelter his child from the spectacles that he gets involved in, including requiring cameramen to never shoot his child.

Someone on Frank Waltons piece of shit blog that they hope "nobody harrasses his family because of this exposure." after Frank Walton made the post releasing Sapient's name.

Franks moronic and glaringly immoral excuse was:

"That's what I thought too at first. But I figured since he's encouraging the blasphemy challenge (where people have been stating their full names), why doesn't he just give out his real name instead of a fake one?" - Frank Walton

In other words Frank, since Ed Babinski has asked other people for their private info before, it was perfectly ok that he asked for yours. And since Ed Babinbski has given out some peoples info before it's ok to give out some of yours. Frank Walton you are a fucking immoral hypocritical dumbass.

Frank doesn't value the lives of others, he seems to only value his own, and those of the 3 people in the world who agree with him. This self serving disgustingly hypocritical attitude is what Christianity has to offer. Christians look in the mirror and you will find little dashes of the worlds biggest asshole, Frank Walton embedded in you.

If you have information as to the whereabouts, the address, the job, the school, the anything, about Frank Walton... you are encouraged to use Frank Walton's moronic logic, and post all the info, since he sees nothing wrong with it.

Maybe Sapient can use the info when he sues the shit out of Frank in the future.

 

AFTER THIS WAS POSTED "SNARF" ALSO CALLING HIMSELF THE REAL JOHN DEERING ASKED TO HAVE HIS NAME REMOVED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH FRANK.  Free speech rights grant us the ability to convey stories to others in as factual a manner as one can recall them.  This story is being altered slightly out of respect for "John Deering" so that it may be known that he does not like Frank and as a Christian, doesn't want to be associated with Frank.

Here is the thread on the atheismsucks-SUCKS blog.

An IP address you want to share?

If you have an IP address of Frank Walton or anyone who he claims to be impersonating him, please feel free to post it as a comment to this post with the title or opening phrase "IP address."

This post is a statement of confirmation that the information will not be posted publicly on this site and will only be used to prosecute Frank Walton or whoever the real person is behind him to the fullest extent of the law. We would like to connect more dots to this puzzle. Spread the word to anyone you know that has been attacked by Frank Walton. You have our promise the information will only be used in a court of law.

If you would like to add a disclaimer stating that it is ok to post the IP if we can find confirmation that such action is legal, please add the disclaimer.

If you have been cyber-stalked, lied about, attacked, threatened, or harrassed by any of the following people help us complete the puzzle by posting the comment/IP here and it will wait in moderation for our crack staff. There are many ips known within this puzzle, we're looking to find more conclusive connections here.

If you doubt the legitimacy of this site please view the footer of the highest ranked atheist website in the world to see that they have our "blessing." http://www.rationalresponders.com

These are the names we believe the Christian who calls himself Frank Walton goes by:Abnoxio, Alan Baxter, HGissufficient, Mark Cote, MrBright, Rich Voss, S_Allegory, stanlee, Terry Pritchard(fully confirmed), John G. Deering(reduced to: possible), Scary Jesus (extremely likely)

UPDATE: Due to the fact that we're not idiots and are able to piece a puzzle together, we must add that Corey Washington is (highly likely) also Frank Walton. Further we are elevating the possibility that Scary Jesus is actually Frank Walton.

Frank, you think we are stupid? You think we're gonna take your threats?


If you feel insecure posting the ip info here you can send the info to anyone you trust within the RRS and they will add it to our findings and help prepare the info for the courts and the feds.


P.S. There are too many very obvious signs that they are all one and the same, we will piece some of it together as we can, however we want this post to be front and center for another day or so. We'll likely just add to this post. Let this be a lesson to atheists out there, don't you dare back down to dishonest pieces of shit, ever! Stand your ground when you hold the moral high ground.

Frank Walton is his own stalker!!!

Frank Walton the dishonest Christian blogger is own stalker(s)!!! We have IP proof and are looking into the legalies of exposing this sick fuck online. More coming soon. When we say he is his own stalker, we mean that he purposefully creates sites that hate on himself and then he attacks himself. He's gone so far as to whine about how someone wants him dead... that someone is himself pretending to be an atheist stalker!!!

Furthermore there are two blogs created by John Deering, one of which claims to be all about reposting everything Frank Walton says and allowing free speech on the site. In other words since the blog at atheismsucks censors almost all comments that disagree with this sick fucking freak, supposedly "John Deering" created a blog to allow any comments to be made. This sat odd with us that Frank Walton (the sick fuck hopefully soon to get the padded cell and straight jacket that he needs) would allow someone to abuse his copyright. So a bunch of people spent the day posting this comment on his site (a comment that any true Walton hater would love):

Best we can tell Frank is an insane man not just because of his religion, but due to actual issues. Here is a post that describes the deceit of Frank Walton Also the only legitimate site we know of that exposes Frank, in a sometimes satirical manner is this site all about Frank Walton and his atheism sucks friends.

Now John Deering, the free speech king who wants you to believe he hates Frank Walton is censoring the best exposes on that fucking asshole who has illegally defamed the character of almost every important atheist in the world. Including defaming the character and lying incessantly about the Rational Response Squad and specifically Brian Sapient.

What's really fucked up about this twatbag is that he's actually managed to convince a few atheists of his stories. Proving of course that atheists can act with poor logic as well.

If you are an atheist blogger, to protect the safety of others you should remove all comments from anyone who seems to support this fuckface.
Do not trust: Terry Pritchard, Ted Bell, Frank Walton, we currently believe that we have a strong case to prove that all of these men are the same people. Stalking each other. Is it split personality, or simply conning for Jesus? Honestly we don't care, we look forward to letting the cybercrimes unit figure it out.

If you are an FBI agent interested in this story, or a lawyer and would like to fight a case against one of the biggest frauds to attack atheists online in the last 5 years, please post a comment anywhere on this site and we will find it.

Also, if you can show us proof that posting IP addresses is not illegal, our crack staff is researching it now, please inform us by posting a comment.

Frank Walton banned by very pleasant atheist

 

ONE CASE OF CHRISTIAN DECEIT PICKED APART

Many people know the Uncredible Hallq as a very pleasant person who values rational and critical inquiry over rash judgment, which is why Frank Walton being banned from his blog speaks quite a bit about Frank, the internet scumbag of the 21st century.

Here is what he posted when he banned Frank, and some extra commentary added by our crack staff.

I was tolerating him for awhile, but from this point onward Frank Walton is banned from this blog. Frank, if you post here, even in response to this thread, your comment will be deleted. Then I will turn on comment moderation and not let any of your comments through, even though this will be a pain to everyone else.

This ban was prompted by a comment made by Walton in which he claimed that the members of the Rational Response Squad advocate shooting Christians. I followed the posted link, and found that the main basis for this claim was not not anything said by the actual members of the RRS, but a guest (one time, as far as I can tell). The comment was not even made on their show.

That's right Uncredible, actually I think that comment was made by Mr. Gawn. Mr Gawn is a rap artist, and he created a song including some words about burning christians if they don't convert, however us sane individuals recognize this as merely art. Best we can tell Frank never posted any portion of the truth from the story. We've all heard rappers and musicians say things in their music that they'd never do. It's art and we accept it as art. What Frank and his cronies do and did was slanderous.
Here are the facts:

• Mr. Gawn has never physically hurt another Christian.
• Mr Gawn wrote and recorded his song before he ever had a conversation with any RRS founding member.
  
• Mr Gawn was a fan of the RRS, and they weren't familiar with him until the song was sent by Gawn to their email.
  
• Brian Sapient said on RRS radio "this is definitely not our message" directly to Mr. Gawns face.
• Frank Walton has misled his readers by pretending as if this message was condoned by RRS and that RRS would actually condone violence.
• The RRS is mostly comprised of pacifists who pride themselves on a non-violent message.
• Frank Walton has lied to discredit the work of the RRS by instilling fear in you.
  
• Such action is illegal, and subject to heavy fines.
  

If Frank Walton has told this lie on your blog, feel free to post the link to it on this blog so that we can make it easier for the RRS to find it and include it in any future lawsuit.

We asked Sapient to provide the audio to show 43. The recording happened on the first day that RRS met Mr. Gawn. Here is the proof that Sapient and RRS do not condone the violence that Frank Walton disgustingly has tried to brainwash you into believing (includes entire song). You sick dishonest fuck, Frank Walton. You're a disgrace to humankind.

His other basis was a comment made by Rook Hawkins about getting rid of people like Walton. This comment said nothing about actual violence, and occured in the context of Hawkins calling Walton on another bogus charge, in this case a charge of plagarism. It was the equivalent of saying "we should get rid of politicians who lie their way into office"--not in any way applying they should be killed.

The Rational Response Squad and Rook Hawkins refer to theism as a concept that should be gone from this planet. They often say it should be "eradicated." For emphasis and umph, sometimes they say we need to rid the world of "theists." What they mean when they say this, is that we need to remove the conditions from society that cause theism, by doing so there would be no theists. They would never condone harming another person simply for believing in a god, in fact everything they do is for the betterment of humanity. They believe that only through the removal of religion can we start making major progress towards world peace. Mr. Gawn himself believes this. Have you ever heard Eminem talk about puking when he thinks about Kim Mathers? Or have you heard him talk about killing Kim Mathers and stuffing her in a trunk? It's art! They are the things we think but don't do. Is Frank too stupid to get this? Or is he a delusional fraud? Or is he simply a conman? Whatever he is, he's a shining example that theism is a delusion that needs to be eradicated.

Those familiar with Walton will know that this is part of a long pattern with him. I know Daniel Morgan consulted with a lawyer who said that if Walton's targets wanted to prosecute, they would have a strong libel case. I assume the RRS is fully aware of Walton's claims and has their reasons for not prosecuting.

The RRS has every intention of suing Frank Walton, as well as preparing his criminal activities on a silver platter for the feds. As I understand it, they have not done so due to the lack of an inexpensive lawyer and due to lack of time. They've also talked about the fact that anybody that believes the crap coming out of Frank Walton is too stupid to be part of their team. With more important projects that they could pro-actively engage in, they simply haven't had the ability to take the time to compile the thousands upon thousands of instances of defamation of character committed by Frank Walton.

In any case, this blog will not be a venue for libel. I have no intention of rescinding this ban at any point in the future--I once started deleting his comments before but let him back, and after a second offense I see no reason to be so forgiving.

We urge and suggest that anyone who has ever had a comment posted on their site by Frank Walton should remove it from their blog immediately. Frank seems to be trying to get members of the Rational Response Squad murdered with his rhetoric, and how ironic is that? Don't allow yourself to be a pawn in Frank Walton's sick game, remove his content immediately.

If you see Frank Walton committing illegal acts for Jesus, please feel free to post them all over this site.

Well I'll give you this.... your IP address is a full 30.7 miles and 38 minutes away from the college IP address of Frank Walton/Terry Pritchard! What are the chances? (that's rhetorical)

 

This part is not rhetorical: mods... watch everything he says. Don't delete anything, if you want to delete it, take a print screen. When the shit hits the fan on this, tons of evidence will be needed. And if at anypoint you feel our safety is at risk, please IP ban and block account... but make sure to post about it in the mod forum immediately.

 

And the name of that Sattellite ISP provider that sends your signal through a computer 37 minutes north of Frank Walton/Terry Prichard issssssssss???????

 

(and obviously you know already Frank/John/Terry/Ted that the location you're claiming is like 1000 miles from where you actually are)

[MOD EDIT: Now it is formatted correctly.] My ISP is Hughes Network Systems.

[Mod Edit: Now with less fat!]

{MOD EDIT: Don't post his prsonal information, bub.}

So you intend to harass me because I rather politely chimed in? I don't know the history of what's going on here.

I sure hope you don't end up calling me.  I'm not very receptive to harassment. 

[Another mod edit]

More of the same. 

It's a little late for that I don't really have the time.  So far he's seemed to do everything that Frank Walton would do while having a nervous meltdown that someone would figure his multiple personalities/accounts/blogs out. 

Had John Deering/Snarf recognized from the start that we're skeptics, and dealing with a wacked out individual (WankFalton) we're likely to have some skeptical doubts.  With that said, I don't know of anyone who said they believe with proof and conclusively that Frank Walton and John Deering are the same person. 

However, Frank Walton is one of those rare people that happens to be able to twist reality upside down.  Just like John did here.  John/Snarf is whining and crying like an infant, while presenting an exagerrated view of the circumstance with an overly hostile tone... Frank Walton trademarks.

With that said, it seems Frank may have up to ten online personas, and some of them can really run the gamet.  From hard core liar for Jesus to something that almost looks intellectual in a debate.  As of right now, there isn't enough evidence either way.  For all we know, Frank Waltons real name is John Deering, and that's how you've got the mail.  Or the mail could be forged, or you could be Frank Walton living in John Deerings house, while the real John Deering sits shackled in the basement for Frank to return for another rape session.

Had "John Deering" been cool from the start, maybe he'd have had a chance.  John Deerings every move has had audiences in stiches over just how strikingly similar they are to Franks.

Frank, you're lucky we actually wait to have proof for our claims.  Or we'd be calling this one right now. 

 

What if it's his mommy calling to apologize for his behavior?

I’m disappointed in you xxxxxxx. I thought you might be the grownup here? Since you won’t take responsibility for a forum you moderate for, that’s obviously not true.

 

[MOD EDIT: Is likely Frank Walton split personality]

Bastrop number, Cedar Creek address...

 

 

I'm drinking beer and reading the Times. xx might have a chance if I start playing online poker and have a good session...

[mod edit:  Never fold on a full house.]

My phone isn’t ringing yet...

Ironically that's all stuff Frank would say, and the reason you claimed to be against him when you launched your blog against him. Your blog instantly had all the hallmarks of Frank Walton and started hating on the RRS instead of Frank (yes you softball Frank, you pussy/Frank) as soon as anyone even hinted at the chance of you two being one and the same.

Stop threatening our users. And stop being a bitch.

Where is Capt. Pineapple with the Wahhmbulance?

 

I’m not making threats kid.  I have time, and money, and experience in the courts.  You get that over time if you’re as big a bastard as I am.  You don’t have users, you have Mods.  That makes them liable.  My hatred of Walton has been switched over to you.  I like it because it gives me something to rant about besides Christians who wouldn’t know the teachings of Yeshua if I rammed them up their asses.

 

You’d better get my name off your site and call me you little shit.  I’m not going anywhere until you do and I get the very public apologies that I’m demanding.  If you want Walton then you want me out of the way.  I’m not him but he is your enemy and so am I so right now, so if he wanted my help to take you down, I’d pile on.  That’s human nature buddy boy.  You want me to back off?  Then do the right thing and own up to the fact that you have screwed up in a very serious way.  Once that’s done maybe you can get back to fighting with Frank.  Until that happens, I will make him look like the pussy we all know he is…

You know I don't take well to legal threats. Traditionally speaking I'm the guy that fights back at those and exposes the person clogging the courts as the bad guy.

 

A very christian morality game you play. Believe this, do what I say, or burn in hell bitches!

 

Do us a favor, subpoena Frank Walton as well, I'd love to see you and him in the same room together. Afterall, he'll likely be crucial to the case.

 

I'll tell ya what... you post a link to a specific place when someone has out and out stated in a factual manner that Frank Walton is conclusively John Deering, and I will see to it being removed. However if you are asking to remove any conversation of anyone theorizing that you and Frank may be one and the same, or anyone proposing that it is likely that you are one and the same, then you might as well stop posting the threats.

Around here we value our right to free speech, over embracing a terroristic message anyday. That's right, you're a terrorist. And that comment will be staying.

 

 

I'm in Texas too, brother.  Pretty close to Cedar Creek too.  I'm "involving myself into some BS"?  Why?  I haven't done anything to you.  I have no idea what to think.  You may be telling the truth.  I have never said you didn't.  I'm doing something illegal by simply investigating what is going on?  Has Bush really screwed up our laws that bad?

 

You need my name?  Ok.  **** *******.  There you go.  I'm perfectly reasonable.  Why are you so angry at anyone that posts at all?  Why are you acting so aggressive towards me?  Calm down.  Exactly what have I done that's illegal? 

Give me the exact charge, I'll call my brother(he's a member of the Texas Bar Association and has a law degree from UT in Austin).  If he says you have a case against me personally, then I will publically apologize and "cease and desist" whatever I have done.  Is that rational enough for you?

 

I'm not really concerned yet.  I'm watching for real evidence that you have a case.  Not being a dick here (like you are acting, no offense) but I think it's slightly amusing that you think you can cyber bully me into being afraid of legal entanglement in all of this.

I'll be surprised if they chase me accross the border for the bold deed of claiming ignorance and suggesting that you calm down to get more effective results.

But hey, what do i know about your legal system? not enough.

If the site was unmonitored the Mods would be immune? 

They have moderators on unmonitored sites? 

What do they do?

I don't think you need a strong case to bring forward a lawsuit.  I think you need a legitimate reason.  Again, I have done nothing to you.

 

Snarf wrote:

By being a Mod and posting on this thread, you are now a party to whatever I bring.  Whether it's fair or valid doesn’t really matter.  What matters is that I include you, and Chris Roy, and all the rest of the Mods, and I will.  That would matter to you I think.  Maybe you can explain that to Brian and get him to do the right thing.  It's worth a try.  Believe me, it really is no matter how bullheaded he's being.  I'm worse than he can imagine.  It's just my nature to fight losing battles and take down others with me.  I’ve done it all my life.  That’s why I have a lawyer…

 

Sure.  How can you and I come to an arrangement that you are who you say you are?  Let's figure out a way for you to prove to me that who you are and where you are is indeed fact and I will pass on that info to everyone else.  Does this meet your satisfaction?