Theist says all events in bible proved with science!

Ni9htmar3r
Posts: 17
Joined: 2007-06-29
User is offlineOffline
Theist says all events in bible proved with science!

Saw this message on the tagboard of a theist's blog. I can't stop laughing. ROFLMAO!!

 

"Yup. Though I am unable to confirm if Adam and Eve have been dug up, I can confirm that all that the events described in the Bible has been proven logically with Science. "

 

I haven't rebutted him yet but anyone has any suggestions how to do that with maximum pwnage and humiliation? Cool


Hambydammit
High Level DonorModeratorRRS Core Member
Hambydammit's picture
Posts: 8657
Joined: 2006-10-22
User is offlineOffline
Geez, there's almost

Geez, there's almost nothing to refute!

Is he mentally handicapped, intentionally ignorant, or just so sheltered that he's never read a single science textbook?

How about this:  We have existing, chronological human records that predate the supposed beginning of the earth in the bible?  (Theists often forget about that other place... you know, where the people speak Chinese...)

But, honestly, that claim is so ridiculous, all you can do is say, "Ok.  Prove it, or stop claiming it."

 

Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin

http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism


Brian37
atheistSuperfan
Brian37's picture
Posts: 16463
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Nothing new here. This kind

Nothing new here. This kind of hokie crap has been going on since the age of enlightenment.

Christians falsely think they have cornered the market on backpeddling to fit a squar peg into a round hole.

I once debated a Muslim who quoted a quran verse that talked about "mountains moving" so therefor the quran demonstrated plate tectonics. IM NOT KIDDING!

The other religions are playing catch up such as Jewish Kaballah and Scientology. But crap is crap with or without corn. 

 

"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
Exactly, they'll find some

Exactly, they'll find some sort of mental gymanastics to justify their bullshit.


Bigg
Bigg's picture
Posts: 130
Joined: 2007-06-10
User is offlineOffline
Im trying,and trying

Im trying,and trying hard,but creationists have only proven ONE thing,and nothing scientifically,its that they know nothing of science,gullible,and a majority are ignorant know nothings who couldnt possibly form a rebuttal to anything because goddidit is their perfect answer.

I dont like religion in general,but to each his own,but learn the facts(or theories as they say) before you run your mouth about something you dont know a thing about.

 

Brought to you by a semi drunken rant,but not drunk enough to flame retards. 

"Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions."--Frater Ravus


Ni9htmar3r
Posts: 17
Joined: 2007-06-29
User is offlineOffline
Oh I see. Sorry but I live

Oh I see. Sorry but I live in singapore where school education is compulsory. As in 'If you don't send your kid to school, you go to jail!'

So for me, coming across someone THAT dumb is pretty rare here (The theist also lives there). But it seems you guys are used to it 


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
We also don't torture people

We also don't torture people here (ie caning)


Susan
Susan's picture
Posts: 3561
Joined: 2006-02-12
User is offlineOffline
Ni9htmar3r wrote: "Yup.

Ni9htmar3r wrote:


"Yup. Though I am unable to confirm if Adam and Eve have been dug up, I can confirm that all that the events described in the Bible has been proven logically with Science. "

First, I should hope this person would be pwned by the grammar nazi. It should read "have been proven" not "has been proven".

This person can confirm all events have been proven?  Was he there for each and every scientific test?  How the heck can he confirm that any event has been proven? 

Is it "logially proven" or "scientifically proven"?  Those aren't the same things.

I have the sickening feeling that this person is going to whip out Kirk Cameron's Crock-o-duck picture, thinking he has made a point.

Atheist Books, purchases on Amazon support the Rational Response Squad server.


Ni9htmar3r
Posts: 17
Joined: 2007-06-29
User is offlineOffline
MattShizzle wrote: We also

MattShizzle wrote:
We also don't torture people here (ie caning)

 

Yeah I hate the caning thing too! 

 

Anyway I've rebutted his 'facts' and now he thinks I've got something against him personally. I guess that's expected right? 


Roisin Dubh
Roisin Dubh's picture
Posts: 428
Joined: 2007-02-11
User is offlineOffline
Ni9htmar3r wrote: Saw this

Ni9htmar3r wrote:

Saw this message on the tagboard of a theist's blog. I can't stop laughing. ROFLMAO!!

 

"Yup. Though I am unable to confirm if Adam and Eve have been dug up, I can confirm that all that the events described in the Bible has been proven logically with Science. "

 

I haven't rebutted him yet but anyone has any suggestions how to do that with maximum pwnage and humiliation? Cool

 

Well, since this guy's theist, he probably means the Ray Comfort definition of science, which is, "referencing the bible and preaching."

If we assume this, then the guy is probably correct.

"The powerful have always created false images of the weak."


Ni9htmar3r
Posts: 17
Joined: 2007-06-29
User is offlineOffline
Another update. Here's what

Another update. Here's what he has to say...

 

Well, the outcome of the debate is pretty obvious. Without a god, there is no need for morality. Even in the evolution model, nature is a concept of a god, which governs the survival of species. Every set of behaviour emerging out from the society can be traced back to nature.

So what does nature says about survival? Survival of the fittest. Now if there is no such rule/law, is there a need to be moral? That is, "don't steal", "don't rape", "don't kill", etc... If nature has selected these behaviours that allow the survival of humans, doesn't this show that there can be no morality without god?

Of course, I do not recognise nature is my god. My faith will still be the same. I didn't come to this faith by chance, by my parents, by a preacher. I came by studying the bible.

I used to be an evolutionist. I truely believed my ancestors were monkeys. I believed the bible was a book of nonsense, with no scientific support. So I never touch the bible for a very very long time.

However, through my course of studying, I realised evolution is filled with too many flaws. Of course I can understand one or two mistakes, after all, we are gaining more knowledge every day on specific fields of science to correct any errors. But the flaws are way too serious for me to overlook.

I thought to myself, why didn't anybody show me the flaws? To me, it seems evolution is trying to perpetuate something. Well, since I got to know the flaws of evolution, I could make a clear judgement.

That's when I started to break away from it and moved on to other faiths. Christianity was definitely not my first choice, but I move into it anyway. Through my study, I was definitely given the "good stuffs". But I searched for the "bad stuffs" too, such as the contradictions of the bible, the lack of scientific support, etc...

After my study, I have came to realise that every question has an answer. I won't move into the details but I found every single answer I wanted to know. That's when I started to move on to this new faith.

I'm proud to say, I'm still here. I would never want to believe in a lie again.

In my perspective, it takes more faith to believe in evolution. The incredible impossibilities in the theories takes great faith. Added that some of the theories are too far-fetched without sufficient scientific support. Majority of these theories are speculations.


qbg
Posts: 298
Joined: 2006-11-22
User is offlineOffline
Ni9htmar3r wrote: Another

Ni9htmar3r wrote:

Another update. Here's what he has to say....


Sigh, I am quite sure that he suffers from some mixture of confusion, misunderstanding, and ignorance.

"What right have you to condemn a murderer if you assume him necessary to "God's plan"? What logic can command the return of stolen property, or the branding of a thief, if the Almighty decreed it?"
-- The Economic Tendency of Freethought