Karma...

SHLove
Posts: 9
Joined: 2007-07-16
User is offlineOffline
Karma...

Hello all! 

I hope this is in the right section, I apologize ahead of time if it is not.  Anyway, I was curious if anybody has any links to texts, sites, videos, or audios to debates or debunks on the topic of "karma". 

Thanks!


Cory Duchesne
Cory Duchesne's picture
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-07-13
User is offlineOffline
SHLove wrote:

SHLove wrote:

Hello all!

I hope this is in the right section, I apologize ahead of time if it is not. Anyway, I was curious if anybody has any links to texts, sites, videos, or audios to debates or debunks on the topic of "karma".

Thanks!

What do you think about the idea of Karma personally? Or what is your understanding of the concept?

I'm an atheist, but I think of karma, as it was originally conceived by the Buddha, as a pretty logical and useful conception.

Here is the original words of Gautama Siddhartha, the original Buddha:

Quote:

As there is no self, there is no transmigration of a self;
but there are deeds and the continued effect of deeds.
There is rebirth of karma; there is reincarnation.
This rebirth, this reincarnation, this reappearance of the conformations is continuous and depends on the law of cause and effect.

Just as a seal is impressed upon the wax
reproducing the configurations of its device,
so the thoughts of men, their characters, their aspirations
are impressed upon others in continuous transference
and continue their karma,
and good deeds will continue in blessings
while bad deeds will continue in curses.

There is no entity here that migrates,
no self is transferred from one place to another;
but here is a voice uttered here and the echo of it comes back.
The teacher pronounces a stanza and the disciple
who attentively listens to his teacher's instruction, repeats the stanza.

Thus the stanza is reborn in the mind of the disciple.

The body is a compound of perishable organs.
It is subject to decay;
and we should take care of it as of a wound or a sore;
we should attend to its needs
without being attached to it, or loving it.

The body is like a machine,
and there is no self in it that makes it walk or act,
but the thoughts of it, as the windy elements,
cause the machine to work.

Dismiss the error of the self
and do not cling to possessions which are transient
but perform deeds that are good,
for deeds are enduring
and in deeds your karma continues.


 

There is nothing flakey about the actual teachings of the Buddha. However, most Buddhist monasteries are rife with flakiness, lies, superstition and nonesense. They hide from the actual source texts like a plague, and mindlessly recite the comforting syrup written by the later Buddhist guru's, who obviously didn't have the strength to live with the very stark perspective of life held by Buddha. For them, the idea of Karma had something to do with your soul's afterlife, you may get a new body or your soul may reach the bliss of nirvana. This is not the way the concept of karma was originally conceived.


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
I have a thread in the

I have a thread in the "Irrational Precepts" forum about Karma.


SHLove
Posts: 9
Joined: 2007-07-16
User is offlineOffline
I, honestly do not believe

I, honestly do not believe in karma.  I am open to ideas about it but I think it would be very hard to persuade me.  I want to read about it though because my brother is getting into Buddhism and I would like to atleast see what arguments for and against karma look like and what points are brought up.

 

Thanks.


Susan
Susan's picture
Posts: 3561
Joined: 2006-02-12
User is offlineOffline
Hi SHLove and welcome to

Hi SHLove and welcome to the forums.

When you get a minute, we'd love it if you'd hop over to General Conversation, Introductions and Humor and introduce yourself.

 

Atheist Books, purchases on Amazon support the Rational Response Squad server.


Cory Duchesne
Cory Duchesne's picture
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-07-13
User is offlineOffline
SHLove wrote: I, honestly

SHLove wrote:

I, honestly do not believe in karma.

 Do you understand the concept that you are disbelieving?  What about it do you find hard to believe?

 

 


SHLove
Posts: 9
Joined: 2007-07-16
User is offlineOffline
Well, first off I should

Well, first off I should say I worded that wrong.  I should have said "I don't believe in Karma the way I think or have been taught it is". Anyway, before I entered this thread I was under the impression that Karma did have much to do with afterlife and reincarnation (how you act in this life determines what your next life will be like).  I also thought that it had to do with negative and positive energy in a spiritual way (in this life), such as: you do something to hurt somebody, you will later be hurt (because of something "super natural", not because of coincidence or because of any logically explainable reason).  This I do not believe in.  However, in reading this thread I am hoping to learn more about the truth behind Karma. 

Now to your first post...I am sorry but I don't quite know what to make out of the scripture.  Is he saying that it has nothing to do with the supernatural and afterlife/reincarnation?  Or am I misunderstanding it.  Please pardon my (admitable) ignorance and further elaborate in what the quote means.  Thank you.


CrimsonEdge
CrimsonEdge's picture
Posts: 499
Joined: 2007-01-02
User is offlineOffline
I'll put it like this.

I'll put it like this. Since Karma can not be tested, it all falls on luck. Now, if one says "Karma's a bitch" after he made fun of someone who lost at a game only to lose the very next time, that does not denote a belief of Karma.

The whole idea is ran around luck and basic Buddhist teachings. What goes around comes around to put it plainly. 


Cory Duchesne
Cory Duchesne's picture
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-07-13
User is offlineOffline
SHLove wrote: Well, first

SHLove wrote:

Well, first off I should say I worded that wrong. I should have said "I don't believe in Karma the way I think or have been taught it is". Anyway, before I entered this thread I was under the impression that Karma did have much to do with afterlife and reincarnation (how you act in this life determines what your next life will be like).

Yes, Karma, as it was originally conceived, does talk about how past living determines the shape of present living, and how present living determines the shape of future living. But it says nothing about your personal ego-consciousness reincarnating after your death. On the contrary, it explicitly states otherwise: As there is no self, there is no transmigration of a self; but there are deeds and the continued effect of deeds. For example, the sort of resentment for America harbored by various groups of people in the middle east is the effect of past deeds, and it's an effect that could take over a hundred or so years to completely where off, that's assuming things will change. If there is a great deal of abuse in a particular family, the effects of that abuse will echo on for many generations. Events that happen to us determine our character to varying degrees. So if your mother was abused to some degree in her childhood, there's a high chance that her mental wounds will cause her to abuse you in some way. In that sense, her life is your past life. And your present life is part of the past life of your children and the entire future of humanity. So take care! Be good karma.

Quote:

I also thought that it had to do with negative and positive energy in a spiritual way (in this life), such as: you do something to hurt somebody, you will later be hurt (because of something "super natural", not because of coincidence or because of any logically explainable reason).

Yes, many people take a very supernatural view of this, but I don't think that was the intention of the original concept. You do something to hurt somebody, and that somebody will likely hurt somebody else, and so on and so on. Not to mention, the mentality of a person who hurts others almost always ends up being very anti-social and isolated, and so they often feel punished for their cruelty toward others. Their bad behavior of course has causes, as they may have been abused by another person, who was abused by a family member, and so on. They may also have a genetic inheritance of certain traits that are bad, that have managed to survive over many generations. So in a sense, the thought that they have bad karma is true, but it's not in the way that they fancy it to be true. What they fancy to be true is 'literal' immortality. And this is quite a problem. Our past lives are millions of ordinary people, some downtrodden in sin, others ordinary, some exalted like Einstein, Hitler, Helen Keller, Marilyn Monroe. We inherit the fruit of the actions and achievements of our past lives (e.g., everyone buried in the cemeteries) Sometimes we are hindered by our collective past, sometimes we are benefited by it.

Quote:

Now to your first post...I am sorry but I don't quite know what to make out of the scripture. Is he saying that it has nothing to do with the supernatural and afterlife/reincarnation?

Precisely. Perhaps you might give it another close read.

And you are right to be concerned about your brother. But I think you should encourage your brothers interest in spirituality, because if you try and discredit his interest altogether, he might just get angry. He likely has a genuine need to find a sense of meaning beyond the more worldly sorts of things like hierarchical position, career, and getting the right women - he feels the pressure of being somebody and it's probably causing him a lot of stress. Try to encourage his interest with an interpretation of spirituality that isn't superstitious, but scientific. I can't think of a better place to start then the original concept of Karma - not to mention the Buddha's teachings in general. Taoism is good too.

 

Here are some great links to look over:

One of the best compilations of Buddhist Wisdom to be found on the net

 


SHLove
Posts: 9
Joined: 2007-07-16
User is offlineOffline
I can't thank you

I can't thank you enough...that's actually pretty cool.    I have talked with him in the past about it, never quite understanding why he believes what he "thinks" he believes now.  He is 36 and has been an atheist and skeptic his whole life, and even though he still does not believe in God, his sudden views (started maybe in the past year) of reincarnation and nirvana were worrying me for a while.  I am all for him believing what he wants to...but theres a fine line between being spiritual and selling everything you own to live in a temple somewhere in Asia (which he is thinking about doing)....


Cory Duchesne
Cory Duchesne's picture
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-07-13
User is offlineOffline
SHLove wrote: I can't thank

SHLove wrote:
I can't thank you enough...that's actually pretty cool. I have talked with him in the past about it, never quite understanding why he believes what he "thinks" he believes now. He is 36 and has been an atheist and skeptic his whole life, and even though he still does not believe in God, his sudden views (started maybe in the past year) of reincarnation and nirvana were worrying me for a while.

Well, yeah, your right, it's pretty worrisome when a family member suddenly changes radically, especially when it involves religion. The best you can do is articulate to him the way you see it, and if he disagrees and carries on in a direction you don't like, well then, you might learn to appreciate buddhism a bit more yourself! As it's message of course is that much of the pain to be felt in life is involuntary and is out of our control, and that the best way of dealing with this fact is to work on not being too attached to people and things, to not resist and work with lifes changes wisely, rather than fight against them in vain.

Good luck, and take care.