took the test, looks like i'am going to hell

Since souls don't exist the possibility of an afterlife is impossible therefore rendering the entire issue moot doesn't it?  The dualistic nature of the brain/soul has been debunked (otherwise how else would people hallucinate on LSD and shrooms if the 'soul' wasn't physical).  "After death" experiences can be recreated in a lab by depriving the brain of oxygen at high G forces.

 Then there's the issue of the absolute statement that everything needs a builder.  A builder is a thing therefore the builder needs a builder and you have infinite regression.  So it's an illogical argument.  Since one of the laws of thermodynamics states that matter and energy is neither created or destroyed the theist is arguing against the laws of thermodynamics, but they never presented anything why it's wrong other than wishful thinking.

Therefore there's really nothing to respond to unless the theist cares to actually present an argument rather than unsupported assertions. 

'Evidence'?? What evidence????

Then we get "everything needs a maker", but of course except God, so its that old explicit logical contradiction right there.... no point going any further.

Looks like you just answered your own question.

Is this some kind of "I know you are but what am I?" ploy?  Because it's not working.

If there was evidence to examine than this would be true.

If everything needs a creator, than who created the creator?  What about the creator's creator?  Or the creator's creator's creator?  As soon as you say something cannot exist unless an intelligent force put it there, than you are opening the question of what intelligent force created the intelligent force that created us. 

The bible has negative things to say about athiests?!  Well shit, that's a new one to me.

Eww.  Please keep your bodily fluids away from us.

......And the bible says we should believe in god?!  Wow, the plot thickens.

This isn't a Chic Tract.  Quoting the bible isn't going to convert anyone.  Hell, the bible is the cause of much athiesm here.

Is it ignorant to deny something that has no evidence to support it?  I think it's clear who is sleeping here.

A coffin.

Here's something you need to get used to hearing:  You cannot prove a negative.  The burden of proof lies on the shoulders of theists.

Hey, this test was a blast.  Funny shit, seriously.  I failed at not needing god.  Was this suppose to scare me or something?

that quiz is hilarious. I decided that I would answer all the questions as a 'christian' should and see what it said...

One of them is 'have you broken the 1st commandment'
(the no other gods one) and I said no..
According to them, if you answered no you were lying because psalm 14(verses 2-3) says so. and therefore were breaking the 9th commandment by lying.
  uhhh okay? 

Hey gents... extracts from this test of faith...

Believe me, however experienced I am at debating the Bible, I've not known this until now. Shouldn't this all mighty God know that I didn't know there was no possibility to fulfill the 10th commandment? I am not lying, I just didn't know. That doesn't matter, according to the Psalms, however.

Nevermind. OK now... going forth:

And we thus conclude:

- we are obliged to keep all 10 commandments, otherwise we will burn in hell

- it is impossible to keep the first commandment

- if we consider to have kept the first commandment, we have automatically broken the ninth commandment

- the penalty of lying is burning in hell

Therefore: we will all burn in hell.

Furthermore, we are being told what will happen:

We furthermore have an adequate description of Hell:

OK, clear steps until now. We repent our sins, and we might be saved. Slim chance, but might.

Now, here it gets tricky. We are told:

Obet what we read. Note that it doesn't say "interpret, then obey at will", but "obey". Let me paste something that I read:

- "So they are no longer two but one flesh.  What therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder" - about marriage... no divorce.

- "Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?" - Corinthians, 1, 11:14... well, so much for our Jeezus with long hair...

- "If any man come to me, and not hate his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sister, yet, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple" - Luke 14:26

- "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven" - Metthew 23:9 - "Forgive me, FATHER, for I have sinned..."

- "...that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in seemly apparel, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly attire" - Timothy 2:9 - This should be pretty obvious...

... and the rest of the Deuteronomy (and for those who think the Deuteronomy is no longer active, read Luke 16:17 & Matthew 5:18-19)

Quite a bit hard, isn't it ?

I anticipate a Christian telling me that these are so interpretable, that surely their meaning isn't literal. But...

"Know this first of all, that there is no prophecy of scripture that is a matter of personal interpretation, for no prophecy ever came through human will; but rather human beings moved by the holy Spirit spoke under the influence of God" - Peter 2, 1:20,21.

 

So much for your religiosity test...

The fool says in his heart, "there is no FSM"
This is more reasonable: "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." 
-Paul of Tarsus I Corinthians 13.11 (KJV)
Use your reason, don't turn it on its head.

Well, loved that quiz.  I especially loved the bit at the end when I said I wasn't that concerned about hell.

  Perhaps you feel safe because you don't believe in Hell. This can be likened to standing in the middle of a busy highway and shouting, "I don't believe in trucks!" Your belief or disbelief in trucks will not change reality.

Well, certainly if I stood in the middle of a highway and did that, I would be crazy.  My own eyes can see the bloody things.  I can hear them as they woosh past and feel the wind as they pass (or the short sensation of 2 tones or more of metal as they hit me).  I have evidence for the trucks before I even get near the highway, and ample data to confirm that getting near the highway would endanger me.  However, I haven't seen any hell fire, demons, or evidence of hell... so I don't really see how the two are the same.  Maybe this guy can tell me how this analogy works. 

I've heard this analogy a lot when I was a christian, and even then I thought it was the dumbest thing.

I think they use it because they they that we don't want to believe. They think we're guilty of wishful thinking. They think that we want to be free to have lots of sex and drugs, turn kids gay, save the whales, and cause the downfall of society all without having to be judged by God at the end of the world.

How can you ask people to deny a God that you believe does not exist? In reality, Atheists do not exist.

 

That doesn't make any sense. Care to elaborate?

If you would take the time to examine the evidence, there can be no doubt that God exists.

I am a scientist. I have examined more evidence than you can possibly imagine. The explanation for life arising without a designer is completely sound.

Every building has a builder. Everything made has a
maker. The existence of the Creator is axiomatic (self-evident).

The only thing that Aquinas' cosmological argument proves is that there was a first cause. It does not prove an anthropomorphic, supernatural, male, deity. The idea of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic God, or any other man-made deity, has absolutely no basis in reality whatsoever. The first cause is a question for theoretical physic, not some idiot theists spouting arguments from seven centuries ago. And obviously a more powerful designer would have had to design the first designer, which is impossible by your idiotic logic because God is supposedly completely transcendant, which means that you believe that He appeared spontaneously, which means your argument is totally invalid.

A professing atheist denies the common sense given to him by God.

Common sense comes from electroneurochemistry and cognitive neuroevolution. This is fact which has been proven by the neurology branch. Care to present with some real evidence that your claims are not just idiotic assertions.

Right now I am praying that the blood of JESUS CHRIST be poured over your website and I rebuke this website in the name of the Father, the Son and the HOLY SPIRIT!

Typical Christian response. I wonder if Jesus would appreciate his blood being poured over our website (Oh wait, he's dead, his blood has long since coagulated and dissolved, so good luck with that)

Remember, as it says in the Bible, "For it is written,
As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God."

I would rather trust a drunker crack addict who sold his mother than the Bible. It is a document that took fourteen centuries to collate properly with various random documents from random scholars still unknown to us and many known to each other. It is a story book, and one with great literary tradition, not a text of truth. The bible says some completely ridiculous things that have been totally disproven, like the Earth was created 6000 years ago in six days, Abraham lived for nine centuries, adam and eve for two, Jesus was born out of immaculate conception (Explain to me exactly: At what stage of embryogenesis does a haploid start self-assembling?)

Romans 14:11 One day you will meet this God who
you so ignorantly deny. I pray that you wake up before it is to late.
Where are you going to spend eternity after you die? We all are going to die. Prove to me that there is no Heaven or no Hell.

When I die, I shall be as I was in the time of the unborn. The fact that life only comes once is what makes me appreciate it every day. You want me to prove there is no heaven and hell? No problem: It is a concept we pulled out of thin air. Every truthful statement must have an observation to back it up. Where have we observed heaven and hell? The same goes for the God hypothesis. For instance, if somebody claimed that fluffy pink unicorns were floating around in the sky, I would be very suprised if a tough scientific and philisophical panel were appointed to rigorously debate and evaluate the possibility of fluffy pink unicorns in the sky. The God Hypothesis, is just that: FAILED. Science works like this. You make an observation, hypothesize, test, evaluate. The God Hypothesis looks like this.

Observation: The universe and life in particular is beautiful, complex, and elegant.

Hypothesis: the universe was brought about by a transcendant, omnipotent intelligent designer.

Experiment: We never bothered with this stage, and that is why the idea of God is just as fallacious as the idea of fluffy pink unicorns in the sky.

May God have mercy
on your souls! Take this following test:

Unsuprisingly, I took the test and it told me I was going to hell. I'll see you there.

-Future generations will smile amusedly at a religion, a force that came and went, comforting as we stared ignorantly at the cosmos, fuelling our primal instinct when we killed each other over our Gods, and then, as scientific reason strangled it, vanished from the face of the earth