now good try hovind! how many peope you just lie too?? well i guess when you got partners like tbn that dont mind as long as it fits their truth right? refer to this website and look at its 5 points area http://www.sullivan-county.com/news/. 

here is a website article  http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/offSiteArchive/www.sfgate.com/index.html

on what Adolf Hitler did do and had Ken Hovind got past his belief and looked at facts he would of noticed this. but i am betting hovind said i can use nature selection and hitler which is a cheap shot because people hear name hitler and they will asscoiate evil with whatever he is compared with. even though they like to be silent that hitler believed in christianity. although they dont mind making the allegation to attack athiests that both hitler and stalin were atheists which aint no surprise because they seem to forget their 10 commandments where it says they shall not lie and also thou shall not bear false witness. but i bet they will claim all to fast they not perfect and noones perfect. and think its all good but if you use same defense they still want to let you know about it. so ken hovind stop lieing you know its wrong and even your religion told you this by god. hey ken do 5 minutes research on what you are going to say to destroy the opposing view because it makes you look bad here is another website ken should check out

http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler-myths.htm. thanks for making a lie up and trying to take blame away from eugenics that hitler actually used. Kent Hovind, aka Prince of Morons we need to add Prince of Lies since the bible gave satan father of lies. and also I Can't Stand Idiots (C.S.I. i will use next time for an idiot like this)

the first reason it can't be true is the fact god did not write the bible and it said he inspired through everyones favorite holy spirit the scriptures to be written which paul stated but i forgot where. now throughout history of this belief when has man done excalty what he was told to do?? i dont think man has ever follow excatly what god told them to do in this belief system history. so i am suppose to say it could happen even though 0 percent chance it has happened so far so not likely they did not give their opinions or stretch a story to make it believable.

2 lets assume actual events are right we know that exoudus was at very least overexugurated by egypt history speciallists. so what makes me believe these authors if did one time would not do it again (blind faith?).

3. a parble is not a true place in time it is made up to teach with and Jesus used these often. now maybe it is because the writers of the gospels wanted to paint the picture that he was like Socrates. or using these teaching to aullude back to King Solomon and his wisdom. but either way they are not true events. so if these four authors stated that jesus used prables to teach then why should i not think that this was used throughout the bible(Blind faith?)

4. i got a question for the phrophsy of john hagee and others like him saying Israel becoming a nation again is a sign of god. can you please explain since not all 12 tribes were reunited like it said. and 10 tribes have not been know about since Asyria conquered them. so basically restoring Israel has not happened because it would have to be all like god promised. so can that rapture false theory again and even the bible doesnt back this false theory.

to conclude this only goes to show if you believe only evidence for what you believe you will do anything to back it and try to destroy opposing views. in only taking in account what your belief agrees with then you will always be at a loss of knowing actually what is true. so Kent Hovind, aka Prince of Morons good job on showing me that Don't Trust Anybody is a good rule to follow and remember.

General