Based on what?

Is it my fault I didn't understand {BALDERDASH} of what he said?

{EDIT: HD: This is KeWK.  None of the seven deadly words according to the gospel of Carlin.  Thank you.}

I gather you're asking the following:

Has it always been wrong for pedophiles to have sex with children, or is this just a passing trend in an ever-changing current of subjective morality?

If that's the question, then it's a poorly formed question that can't really be answered as asked.  There are several issues here.  First, when we ask if it's always been wrong for pedophiles to have sex with children, we could be asking two things:

1) Has it always been damaging to children to be prematurely forced into sexual relations with adults?

Yes.  It always has been damaging to children.  Our brains have not evolved significantly in recorded human history, so it's safe to assume that children would always be confused and traumatized by such actions.  Since it has always been damaging, and since children, almost by definition, have never had control over the situation, the act of pedophilia has always been inherently unfair.  Since human moral instincts are based largely on fairness, (more specifically, the golden rule) we can say that pedophilia has always been wrong, and those societies that practiced it were doing wrong.

2) Has it always been believed that pedophilia was wrong?

Clearly no.  Within the context of this question, we can say that intent is crucial to morality.  That is, if people genuinely believe they are doing good, or at the least that they are doing no harm, it is hard to hold them personally accountable for acts that are demonstrably wrong.  One can only hope that someone with more knowledge of the real consequences can convince people of the error of their beliefs.

So, the most accurate answer to the first part of your question is this:

Pedophilia has always been harmful to children, and when it has been practiced, it has been morally wrong in the objective sense that it is inherently unfair and harmful to children.  Nevertheless, it has not always been realized that it is inherently unfair and harmful, and so has not always been perceived as wrong.

On to the second part of your question.  I suppose you're asking if it will ever be perceived as morally ok again.  I have no idea.  I can't predict what will happen to human civilization in the next hundred or thousand years.  I suppose it's possible that we could lose most of our collected knowledge in some kind of cataclysm, and enter another kind of Dark Age.  It wouldn't be inconceivable for certain cultures to adopt pedophilia again and justify it in some way or another.  Hell, there are parts of Southeast Asia where you can buy a twelve year old hooker for fifty bucks or so for a night, and the government basically looks the other way.  

I gather that the intent of  your query is to establish that without some kind of guiding moral rulebook, humanity will inevitably cycle through morality as it does fashion, and that any old thing will fly if only it is sold in pretty enough packaging.  To a certain extent, that is what happens.  You may not like it, but I'm sorry kiddo.  Your desire for a perfect world won't create one.  Humans are easily swayed with regard to morality, and drastic changes in our environment cause changes in our perception of morality.  If you'd have asked me in the late 1970s if the United States could ever be the culprit in a large-scale systematic torture ring, I'd have said no.  Turns out, when one of our big buildings gets blasted, a good number of us change our tune about whether or not it's ok to torture people.  

Luckily, all of morality is not this fluid, and for the most part, most people are good to most other people most of the time.  That's the evolutionarily stable strategy for human behavior, and there's not a thing we humans can do to alter the math.  Every culture has its moral failings, for that is also part of the ESS.  All cultures desire to be more moral, but there is no such thing as "completely" or "perfectly" moral, so there will always be problems.  For some cultures, it's pedophilia.  For others, it's torture of enemies.  For others, it's equality for women.  That's just the way the cookie crumbles.

Basically, codifying this is next to impossible in my opinion. The basis of the laws are pulling on heartstrings, claiming "lack of maturity" but that argument is flawed in that maturity isn't something age dictates. If it was, I wouldn't feel an urge to stab people in the eye who are in their 30s that try to force religious pamphlets on me and completely ignore me as a person, simply as a target to be saved. They obviously are too underdeveloped mentally to have consideration to other people's private lives, or to consider that they and what they believe are not to the center of the universe.

There isn't really an easy way to measure maturity.

Looks like y'all either didn't read what your own Kelly said, or y'all didn't think much of it. Anyway, here's what she said, and y'all can ask her what she meant. By the way, 'ol Tomcat himself was in bigtime on the thread where she she said all this. Funny how he didn't recognize it. Course he didn't have nuthin to say about it back then, either.

No wonder other atheists think you guys are embarrassments.

Here's the thread

Normal
0
21

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Tabla normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}

http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/sapient/kill_em_with_kindness/10614

and here's what Kelly said:

Normal
0
21

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Tabla normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}

Kelly:

You may be shocked to know that sex between older men and much younger men, often students, has only relatively recently fallen out of fashion. That is why it is a "norm"--it is relevant to cultures and therefore also time periods.

Quote from the guy that started the thread:

Whether [Kelly] is right or not [about pedophilia being something we oughta be preventing] is immaterial to the points on which I will ask [RRS members] to clarify their positions. What is important is that [Kelly], and [RRS members] in general, maintain that they are right.

Kelly’s response: Because I am. Prove me wrong.